SDG9: Plotting a course towards a sustainable shipping industry

clock • 4 min read

BNP Paribas' Nicolas Parrot warns the global shipping industry has just a few months to comply with new air quality rules - is the sector ready to navigate and finance a more sustainable future?

As the world's climate emergency enters unchartered waters, industries are being forced to adapt quickly. None more so than shipping, where new International Maritime Organisation (IMO) regulations will set sail from January 1 2020, prompting a need for shippers to slash their sulphur emissions by an estimated nine million tons annually.

Put into perspective, the IMO says this move will reduce annual sulphur emissions by 77 per cent and, between 2020 and 2025, help prevent more than 570,000 premature deaths from illnesses like lung cancer, heart disease, asthma, and strokes among people living near ports and coastal regions globally. The majority of this impact will be felt in Asia.

While the benefits are clear, the solutions required to achieve the ambitious targets remain more elusive given clean energy options like wind, solar, and other renewables are not yet viable. Shipping companies whose vessels still consume the current low grade 3.5 per cent sulphur content bunker fuel have only a few months to meet the new IMO standards. So how will industry players navigate a changing shipping industry?

In the absence of a renewable fuel solution, most vessels will continue to use fossil fuels for the foreseeable future. To meet the regulations, they would like face a choice of:

  • Switching to low-sulphur (LS) bunker fuel by modifying the vessel's engine to ensure it can run on LS fuel or by mixing an additive to ensure the LS's viscosity is the same as the old high-sulphur (HS) version.
  • Continuing to use high-sulphur (HS) bunker fuel and fitting a scrubber, a device used to clean exhaust gas - to remove sulphur and other fine particles.
  • Fitting liquefied natural gas (LNG) or methanol-fueled engines.

Each option carries with it unique challenges, complicating the equation for shippers. The most significant is cost: LS bunker fuel is around a third more expensive than HS fuel at the moment, adding around $150 a ton. Scrubbers are not cheap either: at a cost in the range of $2.5m to $5m per vessel, they are easier to justify on a very large crude-carrier than on a small dry-bulk vessel. The payback is typically three to five years, depending on the type of vessel and the spread between the cost of LS and HS bunker fuel.

A second challenge for those using cleaner fuel is that supplies are uncertain. It is up to refiners to provide the less-polluting fuel, and some shippers fear shortfalls, at least in the short term.

And thirdly, many ships are not operated by their owners, but are chartered to third parties that run them for defined periods, e.g. on five-year contracts. In that case, who should pay? The charterer, who funds the operating costs, including the bunker fuel, or the ship owner?

The complexity of the situation has called for lenders to think outside of the box. BNP Paribas has developed a range of new green financing solutions to help shippers meet the challenges and stay afloat. The main options today include green loans and bonds, as well as sustainability-linked loans. The range of expenditures that qualify for green finance has been steadily swelling.

Green bonds and loans are more specific in their requirements around the use of the funds, and usually allocated to eligible capital expenditure, such as ballast water treatment systems, scrubbers or LNG engines retrofits, where the environmental benefits can be quantified.

Yet, even as the industry reduces its environmental impact, challenges remain - not least in the Asia Pacific region, where many smaller firms do not always have sufficiently large green capex projects that would be suited to green bonds markets. Here, sustainability-linked loans are seen as potentially playing a bigger role for smaller companies.

These loans have an added benefit in providing more generic options for the use of proceeds, however they incentivize sustainability standards by being based on specific targets around Environmental, Social and Governance ratings.

The IMO 2020 sulphur-emissions limits are by no means the last wave of change that the world's most important transport sector will need to ride.  Already on the horizon, companies will soon need to comply with the Ballast Water Management Convention and the IMO 2050 CO2 targets. As the industry continues to reduce its environmental impact, it will need greater access to new, efficient sources of finance as shipping firms chart their course in a greener world.

Nicolas Parrot is Head of Transportation Sector, Investment Banking at BNP Paribas

More on Shipping

 Course correction: Shipping sector risks falling short of climate goals, report warns

Course correction: Shipping sector risks falling short of climate goals, report warns

Latest Annual Disclosure Report by Sea Cargo Charter suggests industry is badly off track to meet international climate goals

clock 13 June 2024 • 3 min read
Study: Oil and gas tanker firms could lose $214bn in profits if global climate goals are met

Study: Oil and gas tanker firms could lose $214bn in profits if global climate goals are met

Researchers estimate global oil and gas tanker fleet could see a third of its profits eradicated by 2050 if fossil fuel demand declines in line with limiting temperature increases to 1.5C

clock 05 June 2024 • 3 min read
'Chicken and egg': How policy uncertainty is delaying the advent of cleaner shipping fuels

'Chicken and egg': How policy uncertainty is delaying the advent of cleaner shipping fuels

Just six European clean fuel projects dedicated to decarbonising the maritime sector have been funded to date, according to a new analysis

Cecilia Keating
clock 03 June 2024 • 5 min read