• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  •  
    Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  •  
    Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  •  
    Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  •  
    Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  •  
    Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Jobs
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Sign in
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
     
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • Hot topics
  • COP25
  • General Election 2019
  • Green Radicals
  • SDG12
Business Green
  • Biodiversity

Does nature conservation deserve a slice of the aid budget?

  • Matthew Spencer, Oxfam GB
  • 19 June 2018
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

Oxfam GB's Matthew Spencer asks if earmarking a chunk of the aid budget for conservation projects can really help drive sustainable development

It's a good time to be revisiting the case for integrating poverty reduction and environmental sustainability. Growing economic inequality in fast-growing developing economies is exacerbating threats to biodiversity, as poor farmers are pushed further into frontier wilderness. A combination of climate change and conflict mean that global hunger levels are growing for the first time in many years.

Combining efforts to tackle our biggest environmental challenges with poverty reduction should produce win-wins, but progress has been elusive. There has been some momentum in climate policy, particularly in climate finance which is belatedly addressing the climate adaptation needs of the poorest farmers, but nature conservation and poverty reduction have been uncomfortable bedfellows. Put at its simplest, many nature reserves in the Southern world are threatened by people seeking land to farm. Many reserves block legitimate harvesting rights by poor communities seeking food or fuel to augment their meagre livelihoods.

Into this neglected terrain today lands a new report Saving Global Nature, greening UK Overseas Development Assistance by the Conservative Environment Network and the centre-right think tank Bright Blue. It makes the case that £1bn of overseas aid should be spent by Defra on a range of eye catching nature conservation initiatives such as 'iconic' animal corridors in the southern world. These could protect the flight paths of African-British migrants like the nightingale, and the range lands of the East African elephant. The authors also make the sensible case for DFID to ensure that none of its aid causes harm to biodiversity, and call for greater use of bilateral aid over dominant multilateral institutions.

It is the proposals for spending aid on iconic wildlife which will lower its standing in development circles. It conveys a rather two-dimensional approach to sustainable development led by charismatic species, not by the needs of the poorest people who share the same space. This is reinforced by the report's focus on how the UK's aid programme should align with nature conservation priorities with no discussion about how UK global conservation efforts could alleviate poverty.

As someone who makes an annual foray into the British countryside to hear nightingales I would back better protection for their flight path. I would love to see a jaguar migration path established in the cloud forests of Latin America where I first worked as an ecologist. But they deserve funding on their own merits. They should not be funded by overseas aid, where less than two pence in the pound of public spending is set aside to help the millions of women and men living in poverty escape it.

There is a case for spending more of the UK aid budget on pro-poor sustainable development, and increasing Dfid's capacity to do so. The good news is that poverty reduction can be green. Brazil has reduced poverty and deforestation by giving small farmers a better deal. But doing it well requires a much greater focus on what's critical to good development - namely empowered citizens and effective, accountable local institutions. Unfortunately it can't be built around the migration routes of the Nightingale, the African Elephant or the Jaguar.   

Matthew Spencer is director of policy at Oxfam GB and a former director of Green Alliance

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Biodiversity
  • Policy
  • Sustainable Development Goals
  • oxfam
  • Bright Blue
  • DFID
  • sustainable development
  • In-depth

More news

CDP: Corporate supply chains could deliver a gigaton of carbon savings

Investor research group urges more corporates to push suppliers to deliver cost effective emissions reduction

  • Energy
  • 09 December 2019
Report: Climate adaptation policies in place in over 170 countries

Adaptation is growing in importance as impacts of climate emergency grow, researchers warn

  • Risk
  • 09 December 2019
'Win-win-win': Heat pumps under parks could warm five million homes

Analysis suggests approach could cut more than two per cent of the UK's emissions, while improving air quality and providing an income for councils

  • Energy
  • 09 December 2019
Andy Martin
Why green buildings make for better investments

Investing in greener buildings and offices delivers significant financial, environmental and wellbeing returns, argues BNP Paribas Real Estate UK CEO Andy Martin

  • Buildings
  • 09 December 2019
Back to Top

Most read

Climate change
'They know exactly how this ends': Top UK banks slammed for £25bn coal funding since 2015
Scottish Power to team wind with solar and batteries
'New normal': Energy giants step up pursuit of cleaner fuels
'Win-win-win': Heat pumps under parks could warm five million homes
SmartestEnergy acquires Dual Energy in smart meter push
Tidal Lagoon Power launches fund-raising bid to tackle project's planning 'cliff edge'
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017