South Korea's INDC: Reductions on business as usual

clock • 2 min read

Jonathan Grant and Rob Milnes warn countries like South Korea are setting their own baselines to make their climate change pledges look better than they really are

South Korea is the latest G20 country to submit its national target, though it did so shortly after China's announcement, so most of the attention went to its larger neighbour.

South Korea pledged to reduce emissions by 37 per cent below its higher carbon growth scenario by 2030. Its approach of using a scenario for a baseline, rather than absolute emissions in a specific year, is similar to Mexico's. But it does complicate matters.

Since 2000 carbon intensity in South Korea has fallen by 0.9 per cent annually, which is exactly average for G20 countries. It is also roughly what you might expect from typical energy efficiency improvements each year. Continuing this historic trend, in our Low Carbon Economy Index model (which we call 'business as usual' (BAU)), South Korea's carbon intensity will be 371 tCO2/$m in 2030, down from around 430 today. To reach its target, South Korea has to reduce carbon intensity to around 206 tCO2/$m, which is where the EU was in 2014.

Compared with our BAU, South Korea will have to reduce carbon intensity by 4.5 per cent every year to achieve its target, assuming economic growth of 2.9 per cent over the next 15 years. This is a substantial shift from the 0.9 per cent it has been achieving recently.

However, South Korea's baseline, which it also refers to as BAU, is a scenario in which emissions continue to rise out to 2030. In this scenario, South Korea expects its emissions will be lower than in our LCEI business as usual. So perhaps South Korea's target isn't quite as ambitious as it first appears.

All this reinforces the point made by commentators that the INDCs are a mess - using different base years, target years and BAU baselines makes them very difficult to compare. This resulted from the failure in Lima to agree a consistent approach. And it's uncanny how all countries choose baselines that make their targets look good. We have done our best to tidy them up with these charts. 

How ambitious is South Koreas target

Click here for enlarged image

Click here for enlarged image

Jonathan Grant and Rob Milnes work in PwC's sustainability and climate change team. 

This article is part of BusinessGreen's Road to Paris hub, hosted in association with PwC.

More on Policy

Iran War: Report calls for summer of electrification to help tackle fossil fuel shock

Iran War: Report calls for summer of electrification to help tackle fossil fuel shock

As a new analysis suggests 'back-to-back' energy crises have cost households £4,800 since 2021, Nesta urges government to fast-track policies that can curb electricity prices

James Murray
clock 27 April 2026 • 6 min read
Government urged to consider one-off soil improvement scheme to offset Iran war input costs

Government urged to consider one-off soil improvement scheme to offset Iran war input costs

CAAV adviser Jeremy Moody warns arable farmers may decide not to plant crops for harvest 2027

Jane Thynne, Farmers Guardian
clock 24 April 2026 • 2 min read
The government's push to decouple UK electricity and gas prices is long overdue

The government's push to decouple UK electricity and gas prices is long overdue

If Miliband wants to leave an enduring green legacy, lowering essential costs for those most in need must be his primary aim, writes Bright Blue's Cyril Davydenko

Cyril Davydenko, Bright Blue
clock 24 April 2026 • 4 min read