South Korea's INDC: Reductions on business as usual

clock • 2 min read

Jonathan Grant and Rob Milnes warn countries like South Korea are setting their own baselines to make their climate change pledges look better than they really are

South Korea is the latest G20 country to submit its national target, though it did so shortly after China's announcement, so most of the attention went to its larger neighbour.

South Korea pledged to reduce emissions by 37 per cent below its higher carbon growth scenario by 2030. Its approach of using a scenario for a baseline, rather than absolute emissions in a specific year, is similar to Mexico's. But it does complicate matters.

Since 2000 carbon intensity in South Korea has fallen by 0.9 per cent annually, which is exactly average for G20 countries. It is also roughly what you might expect from typical energy efficiency improvements each year. Continuing this historic trend, in our Low Carbon Economy Index model (which we call 'business as usual' (BAU)), South Korea's carbon intensity will be 371 tCO2/$m in 2030, down from around 430 today. To reach its target, South Korea has to reduce carbon intensity to around 206 tCO2/$m, which is where the EU was in 2014.

Compared with our BAU, South Korea will have to reduce carbon intensity by 4.5 per cent every year to achieve its target, assuming economic growth of 2.9 per cent over the next 15 years. This is a substantial shift from the 0.9 per cent it has been achieving recently.

However, South Korea's baseline, which it also refers to as BAU, is a scenario in which emissions continue to rise out to 2030. In this scenario, South Korea expects its emissions will be lower than in our LCEI business as usual. So perhaps South Korea's target isn't quite as ambitious as it first appears.

All this reinforces the point made by commentators that the INDCs are a mess - using different base years, target years and BAU baselines makes them very difficult to compare. This resulted from the failure in Lima to agree a consistent approach. And it's uncanny how all countries choose baselines that make their targets look good. We have done our best to tidy them up with these charts. 

How ambitious is South Koreas target

Click here for enlarged image

Click here for enlarged image

Jonathan Grant and Rob Milnes work in PwC's sustainability and climate change team. 

This article is part of BusinessGreen's Road to Paris hub, hosted in association with PwC.

More on Policy

'Year-round crisis': Government urged to address 'heat trap' homes in summer and 'unaffordable' energy bills in winter

'Year-round crisis': Government urged to address 'heat trap' homes in summer and 'unaffordable' energy bills in winter

Citizens Advice calls for Warm Homes Plan update after research reveals one-in-six Britons are taking ‘drastic' steps, such as sleeping in kitchens, to survive summer heat

clock 07 August 2026 • 4 min read
'Not an either/or choice': Government criticised over move to prioritise job creation over green targets in public sector contracts

'Not an either/or choice': Government criticised over move to prioritise job creation over green targets in public sector contracts

Green groups claim move by Number 10 to give weight to job creation over green targets when awarding £90bn of public contracts each year is 'simply not the answer' to youth unemployment

Stuart Stone
clock 05 August 2026 • 4 min read
EU carbon market shake-up, green skills reforms, and the sustainability profession in 2026

EU carbon market shake-up, green skills reforms, and the sustainability profession in 2026

BusinessGreen Editor’s Briefing – August

BusinessGreen staff
clock 31 July 2026 • 2 min read