• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  • Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  • Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  • Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  • Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Events & Awards
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Finance

      This exclusive half day online event will investigate how all businesses can support and accelerate the transition to low and net zero carbon buildings, while maximising the financial and productivity opportunities that will result.

      • Date: 16 Mar 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      Net Zero Festival 2021

      Net Zero Festival is the world's first business festival dedicated to exploring, advancing, and celebrating the global transition to a net zero emission economy. Join us at BusinessGreen's Net Zero Festival – for leaders who won't wait until 2050 to build a better business, and a better world.

      • Date: 27 Sep 2021
      • Worldwide
      View all events
  • SDG Hub
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Hot topics
  • Green recovery
  • Net Zero Now
  • Net Zero Leadership
  • Net Zero Finance
Blog post ribbon image
  • Politics

Trump's climate scepticism continues to exploit climate hawks' cultural cringe

Trump's climate scepticism continues to exploit climate hawks' cultural cringe
  • James Murray
  • James Murray
  • @James_BG
  • 29 January 2018
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

How much longer can Donald Trump's dangerous environmental philosophy be left unchallenged by media and public alike?

What more is there to say about Donald Trump's reckless, conceited, and scientifically illiterate climate scepticism?

For all Piers Morgan's attempts to spin his self-congratulatory interview with the Commander-in-Chief as a treasure trove of 'exclusive' revelations, Trump's comments on climate change and the Paris Agreement were neither new nor a 'U-turn'.

Related articles

  • The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Redux
  • No hugging, no learning
  • 2020: A year of crisis, crossroads, and alternative histories
  • The Energy White Paper and the nuclear stand-off

The 45 minute love-in gave us confirmation once again that the US would stick with the international accord if the country got a "good deal", albeit without any explanation as to what a "good deal" would entail and with a turn of phrase that suggested the President may not be fully aware that the US currently remains a participant in the Paris Agreement.

It also provided further evidence, as if it were needed, that Trump is fully signed up to a fog of climate-sceptic tropes and talking points, which he is seemingly incapable of stitching together into a coherent narrative. Not for Trump the high risk but vaguely coherent hypothesis proffered by the 'lukewarmist' hypothesis that climate impacts may be manageably small. No, he'd rather stick with an outdated game of climate sceptic message board bingo, parroting self-evident nonsense about global cooling and 'climate change' nomenclature conspiracies and record ice reach and real environmentalism being about the 'clean air [and] crystal clear water' that his administration is still intent on polluting.

But beyond the repetition of these well-established 'facts', there was nothing new to report.

The opportunity to ask the obvious and pertinent question as to what would make the Paris Agreement a "good deal" in his eyes was missed. The chance to quiz the President about what on Earth he is talking about when he suggests the ice caps are "setting records", was squandered as embarrassingly and catastrophically as Morgan's beloved Arsenal throw away of two-goal leads. The hope we could gain an insight into the President's thinking - or more likely expose his ignorance - on this most important of topics was wilfully crushed. The only real news we got was confirmation this was less a genuine journalistic exercise and more an obsequious attempt at ingratiation between two rampaging egomaniacs.

And yet, there was a noteworthy aspect of Trump's comments on climate change.

It's just it was provided not by Trump, but by the reaction to him, first from Morgan, then from the media, and then from us as the wider audience. It was a reaction that reflected well on precisely no one and only served to highlight how badly our collective response to climate change is lagging behind what is so urgently required.

Let's start with Morgan. It may come as a surprise to many given his social media provocateur persona, but the Britain's Got Talent host is something of an eco-warrior.

He has spoken in defence of green policies, he has admitted he disagreed with Trump on climate change, he used his stint at CNN to challenge climate sceptic thinking, and he once cut off an angry interview on the latest floods with the hapless then Environment Secretary Liz Truss with the words:"You can have this bit of advice for nothing - you need to set up a 'department for the unprecedented' within your department, because guess what? With global warming and climate change that's what's going to happen".

Speaking to Talk Radio today he conceded that Trump "certainly doesn't make a lot of sense to people like me, who believe fundamentally in climate change… I thought some of his assessments on ice caps were just plain wrong".

We can therefore say with a high degree of confidence that Morgan is reasonably well-versed on the latest climate science and regards climate impacts as an extremely serious issue. And yet when faced with (apologies to Lord Lawson) the world's most famous climate sceptic spouting verifiably false and dangerous nonsense he offered not so much as a word of pushback, not even the most cursory attempt at correction or clarification. He was absolutely incapable of being consistent and applying his underlying acceptance that climate change is a grave threat to humanity to the situation at hand. He could not bring himself to say 'no Mr President, on this, the most important issue of the age, your claims are false and your arguments are flawed". He just let the misinformation, falsehoods, and hypocrisies of his friend stand unchallenged.

It is to hoped Morgan has enough journalistic integrity left intact to privately regret missing this most glaring of open goals. But then again, perhaps we shouldn't judge him too harshly. After all, as the reporting of Trump's comments confirmed, pretty much every media outlet on the planet made a similar error.   

When Trump was first elected newsrooms around the world debated how to avoid normalising this most abnormal of presidents. But here we are, a year on, with the most powerful man in the world publicly endorsing crank theories that every scientific academy on the planet says could result in catastrophe for human civilisation and there was barely a whisper of consternation nor a slither of useful context in the reporting of his comments.

Many outlets simply quoted Trump verbatim, without any attempt to inform their readers that there is precisely zero evidence to back up the assertion the ice caps are setting new record highs or that the context for Trump's professed love of "clean air" and "crystal clear water" is his axing of clean air and water regulations (kudos to New Republic and Reuters for attempting to correct the record today, not least for the scientist who suggests Trump might have been talking about ice caps on a different planet).

The President of the US confirms he is fully signed up to a school of thought that most media outlets in their wider reporting accept is flawed, reckless, and epoch-shapingly dangerous, and yet many editors seemed incapable of applying what they know about climate change consistently and giving due weight and attention to what Trump was actually saying - which is that he is utterly indifferent to the potential rapid destruction of the climate that enabled the development of human civilisation.

Make no mistake, Trump's climate scepticism is right up there as one of the weirdest and most dangerous things about him. Yes, his unhealthy interest in nuclear weapons is terrifying, but at least he is not firing them off while insouciantly declaring that "some people say they'll cause Armageddon, but other people say they'll actually help crops grow, so I guess we'll see". His misogyny and racism is an abomination, but there has to be reasonable grounds to hope any damage he does will be reversible under his successor. The outcome of the Russia probe could shake geopolitics to its core, but the world would go on.

In contrast, Trump's stance on climate change is to actively pursue a path that the world's best scientists are convinced would lock in risk and suffering for millions, if not billions, of people for generations to come. And yet the reporting of the latest comments were generally framed, with their focus on the prospect of a U-turn on the Paris Agreement, as if this was just another bland policy story.

Then again, perhaps we shouldn't judge the media too harshly. After all, as the business community and the public has confirmed time and again, applying what we know about climate change consistently is staggeringly difficult. It's too big, too complicated, and too scary.

In a typically clear-eyed blog post this week, Vox's David Roberts argues that being a "being a consistent climate hawk, it turns out, is extremely difficult".

"Just about nobody is taking climate change completely seriously at present, because, let's face it, doing so is traumatic," he writes. "To absorb the full implications of climate change is to realize that even a level of action beyond what's reasonable to hope for can at best avert the worst of the damage… To take that seriously is to support massive, immediate carbon reductions, not only at the level of theory, not only in statements and proclamations and pledges, but in the sense of preferring the lower carbon strategy in every local, city, state, or federal decision, whether it's about land, housing, transportation, infrastructure, agriculture, taxes, regulations, or lifestyle habits. It means preferring the lower carbon strategy even if other things you value must be sacrificed, even if the lower carbon strategy is suboptimal in light of your other preferences and priorities."

Business leaders know this better than most. They know it is far easier to launch a new green product or introduce a waste reduction strategy than follow climate change through to its logical conclusion and imagine how a fully decarbonised economy would necessitate a fundamental transformation of their business models. They know it is much easier to sign up to a renewable power pledge than follow climate change through to its logical conclusion and face down shareholders in actively campaigning for higher carbon taxes. They know it is easier to buy a few electric vehicles than follow climate change through to its logical conclusion and lobby against new airport capacity.

Consistency, even amongst those businesses and campaigners who are serious about the threats and opportunities presented by climate change, is almost impossible to achieve.

As Roberts observes: "pure climate hawks are a rare species indeed. None of us can claim purity on that front, so we should show one another compassion. But we should also, at every opportunity, drag our eyes back, unflinching, to the terrible truth."

He is right, of course, the best course of action for any business, policymaker, journalist, or political leader concerned about the climate threat is to strive for a consistent response - a response necessarily based on full spectrum prioritisation - while acknowledging that our response to date has been inadequate and will likely continue to be so for some time to come.

To do so we must shrug off the cultural cringe that makes so many green business leaders and environmental campaigners soft pedal when talking of climate risks. We must reject the fear of being seen as an outsider or a zealot and find a way to honestly express the seriousness of the climate crisis without alienating those who would rather look the other way. And we can start by demanding that media reporting of what all but one government on the planet accepts is an epoch-shaping threat follows its own scientific priors through to their logical conclusion and starts treating a story of planetary importance as if it is a story of planetary importance.  

Most of all though we must have the nerve to point out the "terrible truth" of climate change when faced with anyone who would downplay that reality, even if it is the President of the United States.

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Politics
  • Policy
  • Climate change
  • Risk
  • Donald Trump
  • Paris Agreement
  • In-depth

More on Politics

The car free city would stretch 100 miles across Saudia Arabia
    • Management
Global Briefing: Saudi Arabia plots car-free city stretching 100 miles
    • Management
    • 15 January 2021
Imported emissions make up 46 per cent of the UK's carbon footprint
    • Carbon Trading
From taxes to targets: How can the UK curb its offshore carbon emissions?
    • Carbon Trading
    • 15 January 2021
China has expanded its coal plant capacity to boost the coronavirus-stricken economy
    • Energy
'Economically feasible': New study maps how China could shift from coal to green energy in the 2020s
    • Energy
    • 15 January 2021
Adapting to increasingly severe climate impacts has fallen is not receiving enough attention from governments, according to UNEP | Credit: South Agency
    • Climate change
Climate adaptation: Could nature based solutions help bridge the gap?
    • Climate change
    • 14 January 2021
Keir Starmer's comments came at a meeting with a host of environmental groups yesterday
    • Politics
Keir Starmer: Climate action must be 'at the heart' of Covid-19 recovery
    • Politics
    • 13 January 2021
    • Science
Is inaction on environmental crises leading humanity into a 'ghastly future of mass extinction'?
    • Science
    • 13 January 2021
BlackRock's coal exclusion policy applies to miners that generate 25% of revenue from the fossil fuel
    • Investment
'Climate pariah': Campaigners urge Blackrock to strengthen coal exclusion policy after counting $85bn of coal investments
    • Investment
    • 13 January 2021
Credit: Rich Carey
    • Investment
Can banks become the solution to - rather than a driver of - global deforestation?
    • Investment
    • 13 January 2021

More news

Global Briefing: Saudi Arabia plots car-free city stretching 100 miles
  • Management
Global Briefing: Saudi Arabia plots car-free city stretching 100 miles

Plus Danish diets, China climate policy signals, and all the top green business news from around the world this week

  • 15 January 2021
From taxes to targets: How can the UK curb its offshore carbon emissions?
  • Carbon Trading
From taxes to targets: How can the UK curb its offshore carbon emissions?

Major report makes the case for new carbon tax on imported goods and goods, as the Environment Secretary reveals the UK's climate targets could eventually cover carbon embodied in imported goods

  • 15 January 2021
Scaling up sustainable finance: How can investors accelerate the net zero transition?
  • Investment
Scaling up sustainable finance: How can investors accelerate the net zero transition?

As the sustainable finance sector booms, asset managers and owners are under increasing pressure to use their financial clout to steer a greener future

  • 15 January 2021
What will it take for 2021 to be a groundbreaking year for circular fashion?
  • Supply chain
What will it take for 2021 to be a groundbreaking year for circular fashion?

More than 100 billion garments are produced annually, and many end up in the landfill

  • 15 January 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Mars and DHL plot £350m UK logistics hubs to slash one million road miles
Mars and DHL plot £350m UK logistics hubs to slash one million road miles
Terra Carta: Prince of Wales launches green recovery charter for business
Terra Carta: Prince of Wales launches green recovery charter for business
Unilever and Alibaba launch 'world first' AI-powered closed-loop recycling system
Unilever and Alibaba launch 'world first' AI-powered closed-loop recycling system
'Environmentally regressive': UK government approves use of bee-harming pesticide banned in EU
'Environmentally regressive': UK government approves use of bee-harming pesticide banned in EU
10 green business trends to watch out for in 2021
10 green business trends to watch out for in 2021
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Incisive Footer Logo

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading