• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  • Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  • Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  • Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  • Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Events & Awards
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Finance

      This exclusive half day online event will investigate how all businesses can support and accelerate the transition to low and net zero carbon buildings, while maximising the financial and productivity opportunities that will result.

      • Date: 16 Mar 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      Net Zero Festival 2021

      Net Zero Festival is the world's first business festival dedicated to exploring, advancing, and celebrating the global transition to a net zero emission economy. Join us at BusinessGreen's Net Zero Festival – for leaders who won't wait until 2050 to build a better business, and a better world.

      • Date: 27 Sep 2021
      • Worldwide
      View all events
  • SDG Hub
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Hot topics
  • Green recovery
  • Net Zero Now
  • Net Zero Leadership
  • Net Zero Finance
Blog post ribbon image
  • Waste

A tale of two policies

A tale of two policies
  • James Murray
  • James Murray
  • @James_BG
  • 19 December 2018
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

From surprisingly popular waste reforms to damaging popular renewables technologies, yesterday was another confusing day in the UK's green policy landscape

Say what you like about this government (and you really should, after all it is not every day that a sitting government earmarks billions of pounds that could be spent on tackling fuel poverty or food poverty or homelessness or providing the UK with 21st century infrastructure and instead uses it to prepare for a full scale, troops-on-standby, civil emergency of its own making), they don't do things the easy way.

The undercard for yesterday's latest round of auto-satirical Brexit news should have been the unveiling of the government's long-awaited and genuinely popular Waste and Resources Strategy. Here was government doing what it is supposed to do: identifying a problem, listening to experts and competing interests, laying the political groundwork, then coming forward with credible proposals.

Related articles

  • The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Redux
  • No hugging, no learning
  • 2020: A year of crisis, crossroads, and alternative histories
  • The Energy White Paper and the nuclear stand-off

It wasn't perfect - nothing is - but Michael Gove's new strategy had plenty to recommend it. There were measures that will prove popular with the public, such as deposit return schemes and food waste bins; a move to tackle the market failure that results in resource inefficiency by pushing more of the cost of waste management onto the packaging producers who cause the waste in the first place; a recognition that approaches to recycling need streamlining and standardising; and a wide range of targeted policies that should help boost recycling rates and encourage circular economy models.

Consequently, the response from businesses and campaigners alike was almost universally positive. "Substantial credit is due," said the Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment. "We welcome a strategic approach," said the British Retail Consortium. "A much needed framework to reboot recycling," said CIWM. "The government appears to be getting serious about tackling England's vast mountains of waste," said Friends of the Earth. When you are getting reviews like that from the industries that are now facing higher costs and considerable disruption as a result of the reforms, as well as the campaign groups whose job it is to be professionally unsatisfied, then you must have done something right.

Inevitably, there are still plenty of reasons to fear the new strategy could end up flattering to deceive. The waste and recycling sector is staring down the barrel of considerable 'no deal' Brexit disruption. There are legitimate questions about the cost implications of new packaging charges for retailers and manufacturers and how they could end up being passed onto consumers. Similarly, it remains to be seen if local authorities, enforcement agencies, and waste management firms will be provided with the necessary financial and political backing to turn these bold reforms into a reality. As such, concerns remain that the most progressive parts of the strategy could be watered down at consultation or diluted by under-funding as the policies are deployed.

Moreover, a cynic would note that so much of this strategy is a pretty damning indictment of the eight years of Conservative-led government that preceded it - a period during which recycling rates in England have largely flat-lined, even while they have continued to make impressive progress in Wales. The 2011 Waste Strategy was an instantly derided dumping ground of warm words and negligible policy. The industry warned it would fail to move recycling rates one iota and, lo and behold, it did not. For years after, Ministers would look at the problem, and then do nothing.

It took Michael Gove to seize the opportunity presented by the combination of the 'Blue Planet effect' and China's decision to ban waste imports, listen to what the industry and the public were saying they wanted to see, and engineer a genuinely ambitious new strategy. Whatever you think of the Environment Secretary's Brexit-related contortions, his tenure at Defra has been a daily rebuke to the cack-handed indifference of too many of his predecessors. It is also proof that departments can, on occasion, prepare for Brexit and make meaningful policy progress on the domestic front.

It should have been a good day for the UK's green economy, defined by encouraging evidence that the government, on the back of unveiling plans for the world's first 'net zero' industrial hub and celebrating the latest record-breaking statistics from the offshore wind industry, is serious when it says it wants to deliver a green, circular, and decarbonised post-Brexit economy.

And then came news the self-same government really was going to axe incentives for new solar installations in a way that means they will have to export power to the grid for free. Yes, you did read that right. Install solar panels from next April and any of the clean power you generate that you can't use on site will flow into the grid for gratis.

"Not right or fair," declared Labour. "Perverse," complained Greenpeace. "Damaging market confidence," warned the solar industry. It is hard to disagree.

The decision is the latest twist in the saga of the Feed-in Tariff, a scheme so serially mismanaged it was basically a Brexit metaphor even before we knew what Brexit was. As in all the previous fumbled reforms to the scheme there is a rationale for what the government is trying to achieve. Solar costs have plummeted meaning there is arguably no longer a need for a subsidy scheme that is ultimately paid for through a levy on all our energy bills. Having a fixed export tariff rate for power provided to the grid does run counter to the government's vision of competitive and flexible energy markets. There is also value in incentivising households and businesses to use as much power as possible onsite by installing storage systems.

And yet, the industry is completely justified in its anger this evening. The vast majority of respondents to the government's consultation highlighted the problems associated with forcing people to give away power for free, both on grounds of basic fairness and the way in which it undermines the transition towards truly smart grid systems where distributed solar and storage systems can provide power back to the grid at peak times. Solar costs have plummeted and the government could have provided a smooth glide path to removing subsidies altogether in a way that allowed for sustained growth. The industry has repeatedly put forward credible and genuinely low cost policy tweaks that would make a big difference to stalled deployment rates and the UK's decarbonisation efforts. Instead Ministers look to have fueled yet another boom and bust cycle (albeit it'll likely be a pretty small boom), and further undermined efforts to ensure distributed clean energy technologies live up to their huge potential.

Worse still, Energy and Clean Growth Minister Claire Perry had hinted pretty strongly that she was not happy with a scenario that would force people to hand over for free. And yet weeks later that is precisely what has been signed off on.

A spokesman this morning indicated that the government was aware there was an issue here, declaring that "we will consult shortly on a future framework for small-scale renewable energy generation". But why shortly? Why not before killing the current framework?

This transition could have been managed in a way that still ended subsidies, provided a new framework that allows people to sell their solar power at a fair price, and encouraged continued investment in emerging storage and smart grid technologies. Instead businesses that invested in supporting the UK's low carbon transition, just as Ministers said they wanted to see, are now left facing yet more policy uncertainty due to what looks like a pretty basic failure to properly consider what will happen when the current policy framework comes to a close. I did say it was basically a working Brexit metaphor.

The net result is yet another day in the UK's continuously disorientating low carbon journey. We've already had net zero industrial hubs sitting alongside aviation expansion plans in the past week, not to mention fracking earthquakes and nuclear set-backs in parallel with record offshore wind installations. And now a government capable of securing positive headlines over waste policy of all things has seemingly taken the most popular form of renewable energy, torched its policy framework, acknowledged a new policy framework is needed, and then told businesses and investors 'we'll get to it eventually, perhaps before your customers have to give their power away, perhaps after'. They really don't do things the easy way, do they?

This post first appeared as part of the BusinessGreen Overnight Briefing

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Waste
  • Recycling
  • Solar
  • Politics
  • Policy
  • BEIS
  • Defra
  • In-depth

More on Waste

Credit: University of Exeter
    • Recycling
New National Circular Economy Hub planned for University of Exeter
    • Recycling
    • 21 January 2021
New paperboard multipack sleeve will be available on Heinz Soups, Beanz and Pasta products. Credit: Heinz
    • Waste
Green beans: Heinz heats up sustainable packaging push
    • Waste
    • 21 January 2021
Joe Biden being sworn in as US President in Washington today | Credit: USA TODAY Network/SIPA USA/PA Images
    • Politics
'A cry for survival comes from the planet itself': Joe Biden sworn in as 46th US President with climate action rallying call
    • Politics
    • 20 January 2021
Extreme weather events and other climate-related threats remain the biggest risks facing the global economy, according to the latest Global Risk Report
    • Policy
Covid and climate: Annual Davos report raises alarm over escalating, intertwined risks facing the global economy
    • Policy
    • 20 January 2021
There are fears the UK will have to accept chlorinated chicken as part of a US trade deal
    • Policy
Trade Bill: MPs vote against greater post-Brexit trade deal scrutiny
    • Policy
    • 20 January 2021
The Aurora wind farm in Chile | Credit: Mainstream Renewable Power
    • Wind
Aker Horizons acquires majority stake in Mainstream Renewable Power in €1bn equity deal
    • Wind
    • 20 January 2021
Pritt stick was first sold in 1969 | Credit: Pritt
    • R&D
Greener glue: Pritt Stick debuts sustainable makeover
    • R&D
    • 19 January 2021
West Cumbria Mining plans to build a new coking coal mine have faced widespread criticism from climate campaigners
    • Politics
'Slight tension': From coal mines to nuclear, new Business Secretary hints at delicate decisions at heart of UK's net zero ambitions
    • Politics
    • 19 January 2021

More news

Electric vehicle sales accelerated through 2020 - but cost remains a roadblock, RAC analysis finds
  • Transport
Electric vehicle sales accelerated through 2020 - but cost remains a roadblock, RAC analysis finds

EV uptake continues to accelerate but price, access to infrastructure and driving range continue to deter many drivers, new analysis from RAC has found

  • 21 January 2021
Data should be a net zero priority
  • Technology
Data should be a net zero priority

Building a reliable and comprehensive data infrastructure is crucial for net zero decision-making and accountability, writes TechUK's Susanne Baker

  • 21 January 2021
New National Circular Economy Hub planned for University of Exeter
  • Recycling
New National Circular Economy Hub planned for University of Exeter

National Interdisciplinary Circular Economy Hub backed by new funding from UK Research and Innovation

  • 21 January 2021
Green beans: Heinz heats up sustainable packaging push
  • Waste
Green beans: Heinz heats up sustainable packaging push

Food giant announces roll out of new recyclable paperboard multipack sleeves as part of £25m investment in sustainable packaging innovations

  • 21 January 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Mars and DHL plot £350m UK logistics hubs to slash one million road miles
Mars and DHL plot £350m UK logistics hubs to slash one million road miles
Octopus Energy launches 'world's first' tariff to get cheaper when its windy
Octopus Energy launches 'world's first' tariff to get cheaper when its windy
UK housebuilders to face 'zero carbon ready' standard from 2025
UK housebuilders to face 'zero carbon ready' standard from 2025
Vauxhall faces mass action lawsuit over alleged emissions test 'cheating'
Vauxhall faces mass action lawsuit over alleged emissions test 'cheating'
Scaling up sustainable finance: How can investors accelerate the net zero transition?
Scaling up sustainable finance: How can investors accelerate the net zero transition?
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Incisive Footer Logo

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading