• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  • Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  • Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  • Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  • Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Events & Awards
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Finance

      This exclusive half day online event will investigate how all businesses can support and accelerate the transition to low and net zero carbon buildings, while maximising the financial and productivity opportunities that will result.

      • Date: 16 Mar 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      Net Zero Festival 2021

      Net Zero Festival is the world's first business festival dedicated to exploring, advancing, and celebrating the global transition to a net zero emission economy. Join us at BusinessGreen's Net Zero Festival – for leaders who won't wait until 2050 to build a better business, and a better world.

      • Date: 27 Sep 2021
      • Worldwide
      View all events
  • SDG Hub
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Hot topics
  • Green recovery
  • Net Zero Now
  • Net Zero Leadership
  • Net Zero Finance
Blog post ribbon image
  • Nuclear

The Hinkley negotiations have gone into injury time, and whatever the outcome the government will end up on the losing side

  • James S Murray
  • James S Murray
  • @James_BG
  • 04 February 2016
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

By purposefully narrowing its clean energy options the government has weakened its negotiating position and increased the risk of the UK missing its climate goals

The UK government's energy strategy is experiencing what the man who made Manchester United the dominant force in European football - kids, ask your parents - once called "squeaky bum time". Injury time has been extended again and again, but the point at which the whistle blows and EDF will be finally forced to make a decision on whether to build the Hinkley Point C nuclear project is looming. The future of the shaky edifice that is the UK's current decarbonisation could yet rest on the result.

Officially, the position remains the same as it has been ever since it was confirmed in October that China General Nuclear Power Corporation would take a stake in the project and stump up a third of the costs. EDF has said it will make a final investment decision once it has secured "finalisation of long form documentation based on Head of Terms agreed today; finalisation by EDF of its financing plan; approval by the boards of EDF and CGN; [and] clearance by merger control and other governmental authorities in China and Europe". All the recent speculation the project is in trouble is just that, speculation - or so the official line goes.

Related articles

  • The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Redux
  • No hugging, no learning
  • 2020: A year of crisis, crossroads, and alternative histories
  • The Energy White Paper and the nuclear stand-off

In reality, the conflicting signals surrounding the project confirm it is anything but a happy ship. EDF may have told contractors on the project to get to work, fuelling hopes a positive decision will come this month. But the public opposition from EDF unions, the departure of Hinkley Point's project director, and the reports of further delays to a decision that has now been delayed more often than a train out of London Bridge, paint a very different picture.

As the Guardian's Nils Pratley observed last week, the likelihood remains the deal will go ahead. The government's energy strategy is hugely dependent on the project going ahead and the loss of face that would result from scrapping it at this late stage would be so all-encompassing that Ministers and executives will strain every sinew to get a positive result. Do not be surprised if the Treasury greases the wheels of the deal still further to secure something it can call a victory.

However, it would take a brave man or woman to put money on the project a) getting a final investment decision and then b) getting built on time and on budget. You would get long odds on that little accumulator, but I'd still advise you to keep your money in your pocket.

What is clear is the government has so badly mishandled both the long-running Hinkley Point negotiations and its wider clean energy reforms that it will end up on the losing side whatever the result. By the end of this month the government will either be undertaking a frenzied re-think of its energy strategy in a desperate attempt to plug a Hinkley-sized gap in the UK's post 2020 clean power supplies or unconvincingly attempting to spin paying over the odds for a new nuclear project as a good piece of business for British billpayers.

As any half decent diplomat will tell you the key to a successful negotiation is having some sort of leverage. The government never had much leverage in the Hinkley deal, so fulsome were successive ministers in their insistence the project was essential to the future of the UK's energy mix. But until the current government torched the previous coalition's energy strategy, taking CCS, onshore wind farms, and widespread efficiency upgrades down with it, there remained the sketched outline of Plan B, a semi-credible route for meeting the UK's emissions targets should the Hinkley deal go south.

The government's chronic short termism has left Plan B in tatters and it is now very difficult to envisage how the UK can meet its medium term legally binding emissions targets without either Hinkley Point or a screeching U-turn on renewable energy, CCS, and energy efficiency policy. Many environmentalists will be hoping for the latter, but it does not take a political anorak to recognise that in the event of EDF walking away from the project the government would face intense pressure from its backbenchers to immediately dilute emissions targets for the 2020s, double down on new gas plants to fill the worsening energy gap, and hope small modular nuclear reactors one day prove more attractive than their big cousins.

EDF knows all this and will be using the government's paucity of credible low carbon options to its advantage as it seeks to secure the final assurances that allow it to go ahead with the project. The company's negotiating hand strengthened significantly on the day last November the government axed its CCS project and cut energy efficiency funding.

As I've argued previously, the last government's clean energy strategy centred on a series of subsidised proof of concept projects for the big three low carbon options - renewables, nuclear, and CCS - followed by intense cost competition between the different technologies through the 2020s in order to deliver the optimal mix. There were inevitable teething issues in the execution of this strategy. The government overpaid for the first wave of large renewables projects; agreed an overly generous deal for Hinkley Point, again because of a lack of competition; failed to move fast enough on CCS; and mismanaged the accompanying capacity market to such an extent that energy saving has been sidelined and dirty diesel generators rewarded. But the over-arching strategy was a good one and, as the last round of clean energy support contract auctions proved, intense competition does bring down the cost of low carbon power.

The tragedy of the government's energy policy blitz - over and above the lost jobs, increased emissions, and investment foregone - is the manner in which the party of business and competition has prematurely narrowed the energy playing field, easing the competitive pressure on the nuclear and unabated gas industries in a way that jeopardises UK energy security and will only push up the long term cost of decarbonisation.

With CCS and onshore wind out the picture, the energy storage market still embryonic, and the government showing zero appetite for a comprehensive energy efficiency programme, the UK's medium term decarbonisation strategy appears to rest on ministers' willingness to make an already generous nuclear deal even more attractive to a company that is having a visible wobble about its appetite for the project. And all without any semblance of the Plan B that would both strengthen its negotiating hand and ultimately reduce the cost of meeting the UK's carbon targets and energy security goals. To paraphrase Sir Alex Ferguson once again, "energy politics, bloody hell".

Further reading

Hinkley Point could put EDF survival at risk, employee shareholders warn
  • Nuclear
  • 13 November 2015
Disarray in EDF board ahead of Hinkley point decision
  • Nuclear
  • 26 January 2016
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Nuclear
  • Policy
  • Politics
  • EDF
  • DECC
  • Electricity Market Reform

More on Nuclear

    • Politics
Allowing climate change progress to stall this year is not an option
    • Politics
    • 18 January 2021
Boris Johnson at the launch of the COP26 Summit at the Science Museum in early 2020
    • Policy
Poll: Two-thirds of adults believe UK government should do more to combat climate change
    • Policy
    • 17 January 2021
The car free city would stretch 100 miles across Saudia Arabia
    • Management
Global Briefing: Saudi Arabia plots car-free city stretching 100 miles
    • Management
    • 15 January 2021
Imported emissions make up 46 per cent of the UK's carbon footprint
    • Carbon Trading
From taxes to targets: How can the UK curb its offshore carbon emissions?
    • Carbon Trading
    • 15 January 2021
China has expanded its coal plant capacity to boost the coronavirus-stricken economy
    • Energy
'Economically feasible': New study maps how China could shift from coal to green energy in the 2020s
    • Energy
    • 15 January 2021
Adapting to increasingly severe climate impacts has fallen is not receiving enough attention from governments, according to UNEP | Credit: South Agency
    • Climate change
Climate adaptation: Could nature based solutions help bridge the gap?
    • Climate change
    • 14 January 2021
Keir Starmer's comments came at a meeting with a host of environmental groups yesterday
    • Politics
Keir Starmer: Climate action must be 'at the heart' of Covid-19 recovery
    • Politics
    • 13 January 2021
    • Science
Is inaction on environmental crises leading humanity into a 'ghastly future of mass extinction'?
    • Science
    • 13 January 2021

More news

The deadline for delivering net zero buildings future is fast approaching
  • Buildings
The deadline for delivering net zero buildings future is fast approaching

Businesses and policymakers must set clear and credible pathways to reach a net zero buildings future as soon as possible, explains AECOM's Robert Spencer

  • 19 January 2021
Solar Trade Association rebrands as Solar Energy UK
  • Solar
Solar Trade Association rebrands as Solar Energy UK

Revamped trade body aims to 'lead the solar and energy storage industries into a brighter subsidy-free era'

  • 19 January 2021
Vauxhall faces mass action lawsuit over alleged emissions test 'cheating'
  • BusinessGreen
Vauxhall faces mass action lawsuit over alleged emissions test 'cheating'

Up to 600,000 cars sold to UK drivers over a 10-year period may have been installed with defeat devices, according to law firm fronting mass claim

  • 19 January 2021
Net Zero Investment: What role do investors play?
  • Investment
Net Zero Investment: What role do investors play?

VIDEO: Catch up on panel discussion with Carbon Tracker's Mark Campanale, Scottish Widows' Shipra Gupta, and Schroders' Hannah Simons - available on demand here

  • 19 January 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Mars and DHL plot £350m UK logistics hubs to slash one million road miles
Mars and DHL plot £350m UK logistics hubs to slash one million road miles
Essar and Progressive Energy plot £750m hydrogen CCS hub in Cheshire
Essar and Progressive Energy plot £750m hydrogen CCS hub in Cheshire
How NatWest Group is measuring its working-from-home emissions
How NatWest Group is measuring its working-from-home emissions
BYD and ADL to expand UK electric bus manufacturing operations
BYD and ADL to expand UK electric bus manufacturing operations
Study: Fleet electrification primed to soar as heavier-duty EVs come online
Study: Fleet electrification primed to soar as heavier-duty EVs come online
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Incisive Footer Logo

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading