• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  • Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  • Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  • Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  • Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Events & Awards
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Finance

      This exclusive half day online event will investigate how all businesses can support and accelerate the transition to low and net zero carbon buildings, while maximising the financial and productivity opportunities that will result.

      • Date: 16 Mar 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Nature 2021

      Net Zero Nature brings together global experts, business leaders, NGO’s and innovators to explore why protecting and restoring nature is fundamental to global economic prosperity, investigate the transformative changes businesses must make now to avoid extinction, and consider best practices and latest developments. Register now to secure your place for a unique day of learning, leadership and practical insight.

      • Date: 27 May 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      Net Zero Festival 2021

      Net Zero Festival is the world's first business festival dedicated to exploring, advancing, and celebrating the global transition to a net zero emission economy. Join us at BusinessGreen's Net Zero Festival – for leaders who won't wait until 2050 to build a better business, and a better world.

      • Date: 29 Sep 2021
      • Worldwide
      View all events
  • SDG Hub
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Hot topics
  • Budget 2021
  • Carney row
  • Nature-based solutions
  • Net Zero Finance
Blog post ribbon image
  • Solar

What is the real reason behind the government's solar cuts?

  • James S Murray
  • James S Murray
  • @James_BG
  • 03 November 2011
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

The government's argument for such rapid cuts to feed-in tariffs does not stack up, is there another explanation?

The question everyone keeps coming back to is why? Why has the government decided to impose such rapid and deep cuts to the level of incentives available to the fast-expanding solar industry, potentially resulting in millions of pounds of liabilities, tens of thousands of job losses, and countless legal actions?

The reasons put forward by the government for the cuts are well rehearsed and well understood. The scheme is over-heating with a surge of installations threatening to push it over its spending cap, raising the prospect of an unacceptable £26 a year being added to energy bills by 2020; the cost of solar installations has fallen by around 30 per cent, meaning people are getting excessive returns on their investment of between 10 and 15 per cent, a scenario that is "morally wrong" given feed-in tariffs are paid for through a levy on everyone's energy bills; too many solar panels are being fitted on buildings that lack basic energy efficiency measures, meaning emissions savings are not being maximised; and cuts to incentives must come into effect as soon as possible to avoid a gold rush that would again result in higher energy bills.

Related articles

  • A Budget of green miracles and disasters
  • The wrong sort of recovery?
  • Shambles squared
  • Pricing the priceless

But each of these arguments are so easily countered that there must be another reason for the government's desire to push through cuts to incentives that are so deep and (more importantly) so swift that they will force many firms to the wall.

As we've noted previously, no one in the solar industry is arguing with the government over the need to take some heat out of the market and cut the incentives to a more sustainable level. Greg Barker expressed doubts over solar firms' willingness to accept any reduction in tariffs when I chaired a panel discussion with him at a Friends of the Earth conference on councils and climate change this week. But all I can say is he must be speaking to different solar companies than those talking to BusinessGreen. Everyone we have spoken to accepts feed-in tariff cuts are necessary and accepts returns that have been allowed to spiral above the original five to eight per cent target are excessive. Many of them have been calling for reasonable cuts to be imposed for months.

There is also broad acceptance some kind of energy efficiency standard for buildings installing solar panels could prove effective as a means of cutting emissions and driving take up of the Green Deal scheme, as long as it is not so demanding that it presents a major barrier to new installations.

Finally, as we reveal today, far from there being an urgent need to rush through these changes by next month, the government's own impact assessment shows the impact on energy bills of delaying the proposed cuts until April would equate to an increase in annual average energy bills of about £1 a year by 2020 - or to put it another way tuppence a week. Yes, there remains a risk the scheme could exceed its spending cap, and yes, fuel poverty remains so serious an issue that any potential increase in energy bills must be tightly managed. But surely £1 a year is a price worth paying to limit the financial liabilities that are about to be loaded on to solar firms by these rapid changes, reassure green investors that the government does not eviscerate flagship policies without proper warning, and avoid a costly and debilitating legal battle with the renewables industry.

So if the government's argument in favour of such deep and rapid cuts to incentives is so wafer thin, why are they doing it? What is the real reason behind this disruptive and job-killing manoeuvre?

Here is one theory. It is well known that there is a battle going on in the heart of government over the scale and ambition of environmental policies and the cost versus the benefits of taking urgent action to address climate change. However, there is a much less well publicised fight underway between greens within the government over the extent to which our low carbon energy infrastructure should be centralised or decentralised.

In public, lip service is paid to the desire for a balanced energy mix that features both large scale wind farms, marine energy arrays, biomass power plants, CCS facilities, and nuclear reactors, and decentralised solar panels, small scale wind turbines, and onsite renewable heat systems.

But, according to the parliamentary rumour mill, there is an increasingly tense battle behind the scenes between those who think decentralised energy such as solar should play a key role going forward, and those who believe micro-generation will always be too expensive and it is more sensible to focus the UK's efforts on large scale centralised low carbon projects. Unsurprisingly, the Big Six energy companies are lobbying hard in favour of this centralised approach, which would allow them to maintain their dominance over the market and head off the risk of millions of homes installing technologies that could slash demand for energy by anywhere between 30 and 70 per cent.

It is this context that explains why DECC was seriously considering slashing solar tariffs right back to 9p/kWh, a level that would have completely killed the industry, before a series of intense internal rows at DECC led to the more modest, but still significant, cuts now being proposed.

BusinessGreen understands Climate Minister Greg Barker fought for the continuation of a degree of support for the solar sector, while Energy and Climate Change Secretary Chris Huhne is believed to remain unconvinced over the case for more support for the sector. Further evidence for this difference of opinion can be found in Barker's increasingly heartfelt protestations that he does not want to kill the solar industry, and Huhne's admission to a parliamentary committee this week that he did not bother to contact the Treasury to ask if extra money could be found to lift the feed-in tariff spending cap, despite the huge impact on jobs and investment the proposed cuts are already having.

The scale of the cuts, the pace at which they are being imposed, and the dismissive way in which the solar industry is being treated can only be explained if you see it in the context of the government's growing support for the Big Six-endorsed plan for a low carbon energy mix that is primarily reliant on large scale centralised energy projects. A preference that was underlined by the much more modest reductions to subsidies announced last month for large scale on and offshore wind farms, and the increase in support proposed for marine energy projects.

Put simply, there are some within government who are not at all concerned if the solar industry is killed off, hence the apparent reluctance to consider a compromise approach to cutting incentives that would minimise the impact on businesses and investor confidence while having a vanishingly small impact on energy bills.

There is nothing necessarily wrong with being in favour of a centralised energy network. Personally, I think the best route to decarbonising the economy is the balanced mix the government claims to be in favour of, but there is a perfectly legitimate case for arguing that centralised energy offers the best route forward.

However, what is wrong is the unwillingness to come clean on where the current balance of thinking within government lies.

If ministers really believe there is a future for solar in the UK as part of a balanced energy mix then they need to acknowledge the injustices contained in this breakneck review and propose a more measured approach that gives firms time to adapt to the changes and the opportunity to continue to grow at a more modest pace.

If, on the other hand, they do not think solar and decentralised energy is suitable for the UK, then they would be making a grievous error, but they would also need to come out and clearly state their position in order to give green investors the clarity and stability they have once again been denied over this past week.

Instead, what we have currently is a fudged compromise between two factions that just about allows the solar industry to fight on, but only after months of disruption and market contraction. As far as I can see, that is the only plausible explanation for devastating cuts that defy all other reason. Although if anyone has a better explanation, please let me know.

Further reading

Delaying cuts to feed-in tariffs would cost households less than £1 a year
  • Solar
  • 03 November 2011
Ministers are wrong, a compromise on solar incentives has to be possible
  • Solar
  • 01 November 2011
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Solar
  • Incentives
  • Politics
  • Chris Huhne
  • Greg Barker
  • Solar PV

More on Solar

    • Policy
Study shows net zero transition to affect over six million jobs, as criticism grows of Budget's 'climate failure'
    • Policy
    • 05 March 2021
Boris Johnson launching COP26 at the Science Museum in January 2020
    • Politics
'COP26 is a few months away': MPs slam UK government's 'lack of plan' for Climate Summit and net zero transition
    • Politics
    • 05 March 2021
The Budget has received a mixed response from the green economy
    • Politics
Green recovery or bust? Six green things we learnt from the Budget (and a lot of things we didn't)
    • Politics
    • 04 March 2021
    • Policy
Budget 2021: All the green announcements at a glance
    • Policy
    • 03 March 2021
A Budget of green miracles and disasters
    • Editor's Blog
    • 03 March 2021
The Chancellor Rishi Sunak is under pressure to use the Budget to deliver a green recovery from the Covid-19 crisis
    • Politics
'We need a real commitment to green growth': The green economy reacts to the Budget
    • Politics
    • 03 March 2021
Photo: Victoria Jones/PA Wire/PA Images
    • Politics
'Future economy': Sunak pledges to put green investment at heart of economic recovery
    • Politics
    • 03 March 2021
The wrong sort of recovery?
    • Editor's Blog
    • 03 March 2021

More news

Householders must be at the heart of decarbonising heat
  • Infrastructure
Householders must be at the heart of decarbonising heat

Householders must be shown that alternatives to traditional boilers are cleaner, convenient and comfortable, write IMechE's head of policy Matt Rooney

  • 08 March 2021
How borrowing to invest in net zero would unleash a stronger post-Covid recovery
  • Investment
How borrowing to invest in net zero would unleash a stronger post-Covid recovery

A net zero-focused recovery makes for a stronger recovery, while tightening belts would slow the rebound across the G7, leading economists warn

  • 08 March 2021
The 'three Ps' that are crucial for sustainable investing
  • Investment
The 'three Ps' that are crucial for sustainable investing

Schroders' head of European lend Nicholette MacDonald-Brown and fund manager Scott MacLennan explain the three elements at the core of their sustainable investing approach

  • 08 March 2021
'A greener fairer, economy is not an abstract concept': Why diversity will catalyse the net zero transition
  • Net Zero Now
'A greener fairer, economy is not an abstract concept': Why diversity will catalyse the net zero transition

For International Women's Day, BusinessGreen spoke to green economy leaders on the state of diversity in the sector

  • 08 March 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Budget 2021: Treasury trails green bond launch and £22bn UK Infrastructure Bank plans
Budget 2021: Treasury trails green bond launch and £22bn UK Infrastructure Bank plans
Plant-based fast food: Beyond Meat inks deals for McDonald's, KFC and Pizza Hut
Plant-based fast food: Beyond Meat inks deals for McDonald's, KFC and Pizza Hut
Budget 2021: All the green announcements at a glance
Budget 2021: All the green announcements at a glance
Sweet smell of CCS: Coty and LanzaTech announce plan to infuse perfumes with captured carbon
Sweet smell of CCS: Coty and LanzaTech announce plan to infuse perfumes with captured carbon
'Future economy': Sunak pledges to put green investment at heart of economic recovery
'Future economy': Sunak pledges to put green investment at heart of economic recovery
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Incisive Footer Logo

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading