• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  • Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  • Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  • Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  • Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Events & Awards
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Finance

      This exclusive half day online event will investigate how all businesses can support and accelerate the transition to low and net zero carbon buildings, while maximising the financial and productivity opportunities that will result.

      • Date: 16 Mar 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      Net Zero Festival 2021

      Net Zero Festival is the world's first business festival dedicated to exploring, advancing, and celebrating the global transition to a net zero emission economy. Join us at BusinessGreen's Net Zero Festival – for leaders who won't wait until 2050 to build a better business, and a better world.

      • Date: 29 Sep 2021
      • Worldwide
      View all events
  • SDG Hub
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Hot topics
  • Carbon offset markets
  • Green aviation
  • Deforestation
  • Net Zero Finance
Blog post ribbon image
  • Policy

Mad Max? David Davis' gaslighting on environmental fears is an insult to his audience, and our intelligence

Credit: Zombieite
Credit: Zombieite
  • James Murray
  • James Murray
  • @James_BG
  • 20 February 2018
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

David Davis is apparently 'irritated' that people fear the UK could water down environmental standards - has he really been paying so little attention?

The term 'gaslighting' has its origins in the 1944 film noir Gaslight, in which a murderous husband attempts to convince his wife she is mistaken when she notices small changes in the home that he has instigated. The term was popularised in dating circles to describe a particularly unpleasant and disorientating form of relationship power struggle where one partner seeks to destabilise the other by denying observable reality. More recently, Donald Trump's cynical and tortuous relationship with the truth saw gaslighting make the leap into the world of politics.

Today, Brexit Secretary David Davis has given less of a masterclass and more of a kindergarten class in how gaslighting works.

Related articles

  • Shambles squared
  • Pricing the priceless
  • Brighter times ahead
  • Presidential possibilities

He told an audience of business leaders that "we will continue our track record of meeting high standards after we leave the European Union", before chastising anyone who, for whatever reason, ever doubted that this was the case. According to The Telegraph he is genuinely irritated the European Commission fears the UK could axe environmental and workers' standards post-Brexit. 

"Now, I know that for one reason or another there are some people who have sought to question that these really are our intentions," he said, presumably while looking around for pearls to clutch. "They fear that Brexit could lead to an Anglo-Saxon race to the bottom. With Britain plunged into a Mad Max-style world borrowed from dystopian fiction. These fears about a race to the bottom are based on nothing, not history, not intention, nor interest."

Leaving aside the already widely pilloried point that the Brexit Secretary now appears to be setting the bar for Brexit success at the subterranean level of 'at least we won't end up with desert warlords clubbing each other to death in pursuit of the last barrel of oil'. Leaving aside the fact that while a no deal scenario where flights are grounded and trucks are stuck for hours outside of Dover is unlikely to result in a full breakdown in law and order it will result in crowds of people who probably feel more of an affinity to Mad Max than Four Weddings and Funeral. Is Davis really suggesting his audience's fears about a concerted post-Brexit weakening of UK environmental and social standards are "based on nothing"? Is he really airily dismissing the source of these fears as "one reason or another"? Really? Is this where we are at? The answer appears to be yes.

Davis' assertion the UK will continue to maintain high standards post Brexit and his insistence this position is supported across government is, of course, hugely welcome. His backing for the Paris Agreement and his recognition that "work to combat climate change... has to be done at an international level" is great to hear.

The more Ministers go on record to make such assurances the better. In the absence of an adequately robust Withdrawal Bill these rhetorical hostages to fortune are the best businesses are going to get as they work on their long term, post-Brexit plans.

But the arrogant attempt to dismiss concerns about a "race to the bottom" as completely unfounded is desperate stuff. This is gaslighting, pure and simple.

There are credible reasons why businesses and NGOs fear well established and broadly popular environmental and social standards could be axed or diluted once the UK is free of Brussels. They are the same reasons why the European Commission is briefing member states on the risk of the UK deregulating post-Brexit and mulling what trade sanctions would be justified if the EU finds itself undercut on standards by a 'Singapore on Thames'. It really doesn't take much research to uncover these reasons, although, as we all know by now Davis is not much a fan of research.

Only last week Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson hinted strongly he would be in favour of a review of environmental impact assessments that asked whether it was absolutely necessary to "monitor two life cycles of the snail or build special swimming pools for newts". If you don't recognise this as dog whistled support for environmental deregulation then you've never studied politics. Then again, if Davis remains as laid-back as his reputation suggests, perhaps he has never studied how a dog whistle speech works (an influential MP once described the Brexit Secretary to me as "so lazy he makes Cameron look hard-working", which you can file under harsh but fair).

Crucially, the Foreign Secretary is not alone in hinting at a desire for deregulation, whatever Davis says to the contrary.

International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox has raised the prospect of a US trade deal that would allow the import of chlorinated chicken and other products that face fierce opposition from environmentalists. Chancellor Philip Hammond has suggested that without a trade deal the UK would have to depart from the EU social model and "become something else". On the backbenches Jacob Rees Mogg, he of the increasingly influential European Research Group, has said post-Brexit the UK slash environmental standards "a very long way", on the grounds that if regulations are "good enough for India" they could be good enough for the UK.

Just to clarify things for the Brexit Secretary, the "one reason or another" that some people doubt the government's commitment to high standards is that your actual colleagues keep actually saying they would be happy with lower standards.

And on the record comments from Ministers and MPs are not even the half of it. A report this weekend from Greenpeace's Unearthed website revealed how a network of transatlantic think tanks with close links to senior ministers is working on proposals for a UK-US trade deal that would see a clear dilution of food and environmental standards.

Meanwhile, Davis' insistence that fears about deregulation are not based in history stretches credulity to breaking point. The UK has often been a positive force calling for more effective regulation in Brussels, as evidenced by its consistent demands for more ambitious emissions goals. But it is also well known that British governments of all stripes have pushed Brussels for more relaxed standards and regulations on numerous fronts. Only last year reports suggested the UK was one of the major forces demanding that several new climate-related goals be made non-binding.

These debates about the future direction of the UK's environmental policy framework has played out against a backdrop where green campaigners remain convinced the safeguards contained in the government's Withdrawal Bill are not robust enough.

Legitimate fears remain that EU environmental principles, such as polluter pays and the precautionary principle, will not help shape future UK policy, just as questions remain over how the UK will police and enforce EU rules. At the same time, anyone with knowledge of how British politics works fears a scenario where even if the UK ascribes to EU standards a massive row could quickly jeopardise everything the first time the UK breaches targets on renewables or air quality and finds itself facing legal action from Brussels. Environment Secretary Michael Gove has thankfully signalled he is keen to address these concerns, but details on how he plans to do so remain opaque and pressure on him from some Vote Leave colleagues to embrace their deregulatory zeal will only increase.

It is encouraging Davis sees no value in a race to the bottom on standards, just as it is encouraging that the EU has said any trade deal is contingent on the UK's continued adherence to environmental standards. It is good to hear him making the economic and business case for a high standards and praising the UK's key role in setting environmental guidelines and rules. But with key cabinet ministers set to gather at Chequers this week the rumour is the Prime Minister is leaning towards an opening gambit that would see the UK commit to close regulatory alignment in some areas while seeking divergence in others. Such an approach would, by definition, raise fresh questions about the long term prospects for a host of environmental regulations.

On balance the likelihood is environmental standards will broadly remain in place and could even strengthen. As polling from IPPR and Opinium confirms today, the public is overwhelmingly in favour of a high standards environment. A Hard Brexiteer government pursuing its deregulatory dream would face significant public and business opposition. But there is no reason to relax, no reason to buy Davis' insouciant insistence all will be fine.

He could have been honest. He could have said "I understand your concerns". He could have said "while we recognise some in our party, including some in government, would like to unleash a deregulatory push I side with the Prime Minister in her insistence that a high standards approach is right for the UK". He could have challenged colleagues to explain how the UK could ever hope to secure a trade deal with its largest market if it set its sights on regulatory divergence. Instead he insulted his audience by insisting there was nothing to see here, that their fears were unfounded.

As is so often the case with Brexit it is hard to tell with this dismissal of reality is a result of cynicism on Davis' part or whether he genuinely believes his own disingenous spin.

Of all the privations of Brexit - the inflation and the weakening of the pound, the division and the coarsening of public debate, the all-consuming uncertainty and the mounting fear that over a decade of public life will be consumed by this inherently high risk project - it is the insulting of our collective intelligence that grates the most.

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Policy
  • Politics
  • David Davis
  • Brexit
  • Green Brexit

More on Policy

    • Supply chain
The steel industry will soon have little use for Cumbrian coal
    • Supply chain
    • 25 February 2021
Homes in some parts of the UK could take 30 years longer to meet energy efficiency goals, according to Kamma
    • Buildings
Report: £43.3bn of investment needed to meet 2030 greener homes goal
    • Buildings
    • 24 February 2021
The government has pledged to pursue a sustainable approach to agriculture policy following Brexit
    • Policy
Autumn pilot scheduled for Sustainable Farming Incentive scheme
    • Policy
    • 24 February 2021
    • Politics
Boris Johnson: 'Climate change is a threat to our collective security'
    • Politics
    • 24 February 2021
    • Investment
Net Zero Finance: Full speaker line-up confirmed
    • Investment
    • 24 February 2021
    • Politics
If the Green Homes Grant fiasco is any indicator of the government's climate action, we are in trouble
    • Politics
    • 24 February 2021
    • Policy
REA: Half of UK electricity generation could be produced by renewables by next year
    • Policy
    • 24 February 2021
Boris Johnson chairing the first ever UN Security Council meeting focused on climate change
    • Politics
Johnson and Attenborough warn of global security threat from climate breakdown
    • Politics
    • 23 February 2021

More news

'Survive and thrive': Over 600 top businesses launch new network in bid to bolster climate resilience
  • BusinessGreen
'Survive and thrive': Over 600 top businesses launch new network in bid to bolster climate resilience

A new group bringing together businesses with revenues totaling over $3tr and around 10 million employees has pledged to work to build resilience to the climate crisis and other potential economic shocks

  • 25 February 2021
Boost for biofuels as E10 petrol given green light across UK
  • Supply chain
Boost for biofuels as E10 petrol given green light across UK

Government claims using higher proportion of bioethanol in petrol can help cut car CO2 while boosting jobs across the biofuel sector

  • 25 February 2021
The steel industry will soon have little use for Cumbrian coal
  • Supply chain
The steel industry will soon have little use for Cumbrian coal

Global market forces and the impending shift towards greener forms of steel manufacturing will likely render plans for a new coal mine in Cumbria redundant, writes Andrew Warren

  • 25 February 2021
Tevva raises $12.5m from investors to accelerate production of e-truck range
  • Haulage
Tevva raises $12.5m from investors to accelerate production of e-truck range

Chelmsford-based firm claims it has developed a technology that allows vehicles to "break the range barrier for electric battery propulsion" in freight vehicles

  • 25 February 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Bulb co-founder steps down to focus on battery storage venture
Bulb co-founder steps down to focus on battery storage venture
Judge overturns approval for 1.8GW Norfolk Vanguard project
Judge overturns approval for 1.8GW Norfolk Vanguard project
HSBC, Barclays, NatWest join Prince of Wales' net zero banking task force
HSBC, Barclays, NatWest join Prince of Wales' net zero banking task force
HSBC hires PwC climate change lead Celine Herweijer as group chief sustainability officer
HSBC hires PwC climate change lead Celine Herweijer as group chief sustainability officer
Labour slams 'shambolic delivery' of Green Homes Grants, as reports suggest scheme could be axed
Labour slams 'shambolic delivery' of Green Homes Grants, as reports suggest scheme could be axed
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Cookie Settings
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Incisive Footer Logo

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading