• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  • Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  • Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  • Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  • Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Events & Awards
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Finance

      This exclusive half day online event will investigate how all businesses can support and accelerate the transition to low and net zero carbon buildings, while maximising the financial and productivity opportunities that will result.

      • Date: 16 Mar 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      Net Zero Festival 2021

      Net Zero Festival is the world's first business festival dedicated to exploring, advancing, and celebrating the global transition to a net zero emission economy. Join us at BusinessGreen's Net Zero Festival – for leaders who won't wait until 2050 to build a better business, and a better world.

      • Date: 27 Sep 2021
      • Worldwide
      View all events
  • SDG Hub
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Hot topics
  • Green recovery
  • Net Zero Now
  • Net Zero Leadership
  • Net Zero Finance
 

Sponsor content:

This content has been brought to you in association with our sponsors

  • Nuclear

Nuclear power - tragedy and choice

  • Alan Whitehead MP
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

My heart goes out to the brave technicians battling to prevent meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant complex in Japan. It is a unique concatenation of tragedies for Japan that on top of a devastating earthquake and tsunami, it faces the prospect of the sterilisation of a part of Hachirogata Island as a result of nuclear fallout - if the critical state of the nuclear cores in at least two of the reactors cannot be brought under control.

I thought Chris Huhne, in responding to questions about the disaster in DECC select committee on Tuesday, was measured and prudent. He has commissioned a report into UK nuclear safety from Dr Weightman, the chief nuclear inspector and pointed out that as far as earthquakes are concerned the worst suffered in the UK - off the Dogger Bank - was 130,000 times milder than the quake off Japan last week.

I take the point about the lack of wide parallels between highly exceptional circumstances in Japan and nuclear safety in the UK - and it is certainly true that, with hindsight, building so many reactors in Japan right on a major tectonic fault line made the unforeseen very foreseeable.

But... there are some parallels to the extent that all but one of the present UK reactors are built on sites that may be exposed to flooding in future years, especially if sea levels and anticyclone activities rise in the next decades as predicted. And since all the new sites pre-selected for future nuclear development are adjacent to those present operating plants, then flood defence and back-up systems need to be looked at. It was, after all, flooding that knocked out the back-up systems at Fukushima and prevented early action to shut plants down safely.

These latest events don't sway me from the view I've taken over a long period, which is that proposals to build new nuclear power are a choice, not a necessity. It has never been true, as some new-build zealots allege that the lights will go out if we don't commission a new generation of nuclear power immediately. They won't and the contribution nuclear power makes now or will make in the future to our overall energy requirements - electricity heat and transport - is tiny, and can be sourced for the future by other means.

I doubt Chris Huhne has resiled personally from this view, which I know he shared until the last election. He is, of course in a difficult position as a result of the coalition agreement - but perhaps the longer-term prudent position would be to order a wider review of the need for and the alternatives to, a future UK nuclear programme. That, on any fair-minded approach, would show that we really don't need nuclear in our future energy mix, and that we can do without. It might be wise for the future if we decided on that course.

This post first appeared on Alan's Energy Blog.

Dr Alan Whitehead is the Labour Member of Parliament for Southampton Test. He is a member of the House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Select Committee, as well as the Environmental Audit Select Committee, and has been on the Public Bill Committees for every major piece of UK energy and climate change legislation in recent years, including the Climate Change Act 2008. He is also chairman of a number of cross-party groups on these issues.

 

 

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Nuclear
  • Policy
  • Chris Huhne
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Incisive Footer Logo

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading