• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  • Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  • Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  • Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  • Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Events & Awards
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Finance

      This exclusive half day online event will investigate how all businesses can support and accelerate the transition to low and net zero carbon buildings, while maximising the financial and productivity opportunities that will result.

      • Date: 16 Mar 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      Net Zero Festival 2021

      Net Zero Festival is the world's first business festival dedicated to exploring, advancing, and celebrating the global transition to a net zero emission economy. Join us at BusinessGreen's Net Zero Festival – for leaders who won't wait until 2050 to build a better business, and a better world.

      • Date: 29 Sep 2021
      • Worldwide
      View all events
  • SDG Hub
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Hot topics
  • Carbon offset markets
  • Green aviation
  • Deforestation
  • Net Zero Finance
Blog post ribbon image
  • Politics

It is Conservative climate policy incoherence that is fueling this Lords stand-off

  • James S Murray
  • James S Murray
  • @James_BG
  • 18 January 2016
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

The House of Lords is threatening to disrupt the government's energy policy proposals, and the Conservatives have only themselves to blame

Every functioning, or indeed half-functioning, democracy needs its checks and balances; its mechanisms for forcing a government to think again when it is pursuing strategies that are incoherent, unmandated, or self-defeating. Consequently, the only surprising thing about the imminent battle between the government and the House of Lords over energy and climate policy is that it has taken this long to emerge.

The news over the weekend that Labour and Lib Dem peers are threatening to derail government plans to bring an early end to onshore wind farm subsidies, just as Labour seeks to force a ministerial rethink on carbon capture and storage (CCS) suggests that after six months when the Conservatives have been given a pretty easy ride the political battle over the UK's decarbonisation strategy could be about to heat up.

Related articles

  • Shambles squared
  • Pricing the priceless
  • Brighter times ahead
  • Presidential possibilities

This latest row is likely to result in yet more policy uncertainty for the wind farm developers and CCS investors affected, but it could also delay or dilute the fallout from policy changes that a study for the Independent today warned will result in UK renewables investment being pushed "off a cliff".

As with the Lords-enforced tax credit u-turn, the government will no doubt be furious about these turbulent peers and their unelected over-reach. Expect Number 10 to use any House of Lords resistance over the Energy Bill as further ammunition for its threatened planned to flood the upper house with Tory peers. But as with the tax credit u-turn, the government only has itself to blame.

The vague and inconsistent nature of the Tory manifesto at the last election not only created massive policy confusion for energy investors, it has also given any peers who wish to tear into the government's energy and climate strategy the opportunity to do so.

Somewhat perversely the initial flashpoint with the Lords will be over one of the few areas where the Conservatives offered a relatively clear signal about their plans: onshore wind farms. The manifesto said the Party would "halt the spread of onshore windfarms" and "end any new public subsidy for them". It may sound clear enough, but in failing to define which subsidies qualify as "new" the government immediately put itself at risk of a challenge when it moved to end existing Renewables Obligation (RO) subsidies for onshore wind farms a year earlier than planned at the start of April 2016.

As a result Labour and Lib Dem peers will feel completely justified in sticking to their guns and voting down the proposals for a second time if the government seeks to put them back in the Energy Bill. Their position is strengthened further by the still remarkable inconsistency the government is showing towards different clean energy sources, which has seen ministers trumpet affordability while blocking the development of the cheapest forms of clean energy. When the government's own impact assessment says the proposed changes to the RO will save consumers 30p a year and logic dictates replacing onshore wind farms with more expensive alternatives will increase the cost of the UK's decarbonisation peers will not only feel they have the right to oppose the government, they will relish doing so. After all, the Conservative manifesto stated clearly that "we will cut emissions as cost-effectively as possible".

With the option of forcing the legislation through by using the Parliament Act not available because the bill started life in the Lords, the government now has to decide whether to seek a compromise or risk seeing its first major piece of energy legislation and a key manifesto pledge thwarted.

Moreover, this could be a sign of things to come. If the Conservative manifesto was too vague on wind energy reforms it was clear on CCS. It praised the previous government's commitment of £1bn of funding and made no mention whatsoever that this investment was at risk. And then the Treasury killed the programme with zero notice.

Consequently, Labour's move to request an National Audit Office investigation into the Treasury's handling of CCS and plan to insert an amendment to the Energy Bill requiring the government to implement a new "comprehensive national strategy for CCS to deliver the emissions reductions required" look like a reasonable set of proposals. The opposition will likely struggle to get the amendment passed in the Commons, but again many peers will feel they have every right to force the government into a rethink on CCS.

There is a clear irony in the way an unelected chamber is called upon to provide a check on an elected chamber. But if the MPs in the elected chamber wish to pursue policies that weren't put before the electorate and which undermine legally-binding commitments, then it is the job of peers to remind the government of its responsibilities.

The government could have avoided these latest challenges if ahead of the election it had defined how it planned to reform onshore wind energy subsidies and argued that while it wanted to cut emissions cost effectively certain technologies would be verboten for reasons of visual impact. It could have spiked the Lords' guns had it made it clear CCS funding was subject to cost considerations, or alternatively had accompanied the news investment was to be halted with a coherent plan for meeting medium and long-term emissions goals without these CCS projects. Instead it has pursued a strategy with holes big enough to drive an electric bus through (at least until the promised new "emissions reduction plan" materialises later this year) - peers cannot be blamed for trying to hold the government to account. 

For various reasons this is likely to be a parliament when the House of Lords flexes its muscles with considerable regularity, and energy, climate and environmental policy are set to be a frequent source of parliamentary contention. As with the tax credits U-turn it may be in the government's own interests to resist the temptation to rage at the upper house and embrace the opportunity to re-think its position and get itself back on the right side of the argument. After all, that is what checks and balances are for.

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Politics
  • Policy
  • Climate Change Act
  • Wind Farms
  • Conservative Party
  • Labour Party
  • Carbon Capture and Storage

More on Politics

    • Climate change
UN: Weak 2030 national climate plans put world 'very far' from meeting Paris goals
    • Climate change
    • 26 February 2021
Mark Carney was last year appointed Boris Johnson's Finance Advisor for COP26 | Credit: Andrew Parsons/Number 10 Downing Street
    • Net Zero Now
'Worrying': Carney and Brookfield row throws spotlight on 'net zero' confusion
    • Net Zero Now
    • 26 February 2021
    • Investment
What does delivering a net zero investment portfolio actually entail?
    • Investment
    • 26 February 2021
Solar capacity in the UK stood at around 14GW in 2020
    • Solar
Government urged to target 40GW solar capacity by 2030
    • Solar
    • 26 February 2021
The government is aiming to shift the car market to pure-electric and zero emission by 2035
    • Automotive
UK has 'long way to go' to build purely electric car market, spending watchdog warns
    • Automotive
    • 26 February 2021
The River Ouse floods the centre of York | Credit: iStock
    • Buildings
Could poor flood provisions cause the next major building regulations scandal?
    • Buildings
    • 26 February 2021
 International shipping accounted for about 2-3 per cent of global greenhouse emissions pre-pandemic
    • Aviation
Government urged to factor aviation and shipping into UK climate goals
    • Aviation
    • 25 February 2021
Homeowners can apply for solar installations and other green tech under the Green Homes Grant
    • Politics
CCC and trade unions urge government to fix embattled Green Homes Grant Scheme
    • Politics
    • 25 February 2021

More news

Mark Carney responds to mounting criticism of 'net zero' claims
  • Investment
Mark Carney responds to mounting criticism of 'net zero' claims

Carney concedes avoided emissions do not count toward science-based net zero targets, despite previously claiming asset manager Brookfield is 'net zero today' due to its investments in renewables

  • 26 February 2021
Global Briefing: Bangladesh drops plans for nine new coal plants
  • Management
Global Briefing: Bangladesh drops plans for nine new coal plants

SEC climate disclosure plans, hydrogen developments, and climate-committed K-Pop are to the fore in this week's Global Briefing

  • 26 February 2021
Digging into the complex, confusing, and contentious world of soil carbon offsets
  • Offsets
Digging into the complex, confusing, and contentious world of soil carbon offsets

Jim Giles explores the deep divisions that are shaping the emerging field of soil-based offsets

  • 26 February 2021
UN: Weak 2030 national climate plans put world 'very far' from meeting Paris goals
  • Climate change
UN: Weak 2030 national climate plans put world 'very far' from meeting Paris goals

UN urges countries to submit tougher climate plans to meet Paris goals and prevent climate catastrophe

  • 26 February 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Michelin and Bridgestone accelerate green tyre innovations
Michelin and Bridgestone accelerate green tyre innovations
Deforestation for palm oil reduced ten-fold in Southeast Asia, data reveals
Deforestation for palm oil reduced ten-fold in Southeast Asia, data reveals
'More than affordable': Aviation could offset its way to 'carbon neutrality' with minimal impact on profitability
'More than affordable': Aviation could offset its way to 'carbon neutrality' with minimal impact on profitability
REA: Half of UK electricity generation could be produced by renewables by next year
REA: Half of UK electricity generation could be produced by renewables by next year
Greggs serves up fresh green energy and food waste goals
Greggs serves up fresh green energy and food waste goals
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Cookie Settings
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Incisive Footer Logo

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading