• Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
    • Wind
    • Marine
    • Solar
    • Biomass
    • Nuclear
    • CCS
    • Infrastructure
  • Policy
    • Politics
    • Legislation
    • Taxation
  • Management
    • Marketing
    • Risk
    • Skills
    • Incentives
    • Carbon Accounting
  • Technology
    • Waste
    • Recycling
    • R&D
    • Efficiency
    • IT
  • Investment
    • Carbon Trading
    • Offsets
    • Venture Capital
  • Net Zero Now
  • Events & Awards
  • SDG Hub
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
      • Newsletters
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
    • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

      If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

      If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

      Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

      Email: [email protected]

      • Sign in
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Events & Awards
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      NZF Pathway - Finance

      This exclusive half day online event will investigate how all businesses can support and accelerate the transition to low and net zero carbon buildings, while maximising the financial and productivity opportunities that will result.

      • Date: 16 Mar 2021
      • Online Event
      event logo
      Net Zero Festival 2021

      Net Zero Festival is the world's first business festival dedicated to exploring, advancing, and celebrating the global transition to a net zero emission economy. Join us at BusinessGreen's Net Zero Festival – for leaders who won't wait until 2050 to build a better business, and a better world.

      • Date: 29 Sep 2021
      • Worldwide
      View all events
  • SDG Hub
Business Green
Business Green
  • Home
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Net Zero Now
 
    • Newsletters
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • You are currently accessing BusinessGreen via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
  • Hot topics
  • Budget 2021
  • Carney row
  • Nature-based solutions
  • Net Zero Finance
Blog post ribbon image
  • Policy

The government can scale back renewables if it wants, but where is its alternative?

  • James S Murray
  • James S Murray
  • @James_BG
  • 27 August 2015
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

The latest attack on the renewables sector in a bid to cut energy bills by £6 is bad enough, the failure to set out an alternative vision is even worst

What will you do with the £6 the government is proposing to save you in 2020 by eviscerating the UK's most popular renewable energy scheme? What about the £1 the proposed reforms will shave off the average household electricity bill next year? What will you do with your 0.2 per cent saving? Don't spend it all at once.

These are, of course, slightly facetious questions. The government does need to take steps to cut spending on renewable energy subsidies given its Levy Control Framework (LCF) spending cap looks set to be breached by a cool £1.5bn by 2020, a scenario that would lead to significantly more upward pressure on bills than the nominal £6 the latest reforms are designed to save. Fuel poverty remains a serious problem and even if bills are falling currently, there is a compelling case for getting spending on green levies on a much tighter rein.

Related articles

  • Shambles squared
  • Pricing the priceless
  • Brighter times ahead
  • Presidential possibilities

However, the point implied by my opening questions stands; we are talking about a vanishingly small amount of money in the grand scheme of things. And it is a sum that the US, China, Germany and many others are more than willing to invest in the pursuit of a modern, sustainable, healthy, and clean energy system. Thousands of jobs are likely to be lost, emissions savings will go begging, an innovative and modern industry that is close to being able to operate without subsidy will be badly damaged, and all for what amounts to a rounding error in both national and household accounts.

It is also worth noting the putative £6 per household saving is based on the government's old trick of comparing the impact of its proposals with a 'do nothing' scenario, when no one in the renewables industry was expecting or advocating for the status quo to continue. Most within the renewables industry accept cuts are needed and justified. The solar sector has set out plans for withdrawing subsidies gradually in a way that allows it to become virtually subsidy free this decade. Set the latest projected savings against a scenario where the government cuts tariffs in a more gradual way and the expected £6 saving delivered by its scorched earth approach would be more modest still.

There are two big over-arching flaws in the government's latest attack on the clean energy sector, one practical, the other structural.

The first is the same problem that has befallen any attempt to reform the feed-in tariff in recent years. The announcement of prospective cuts triggers an inevitable boom and bust cycle where people rush to take advantage of the higher tariffs before they are cut. The fatal flaw in the scheme's design remains as pronounced as ever. Maf Smith of RenewableUK today warned the government risks turning "the British energy market into a wild-west market". No one would be that surprised if the government ends up making good on its thinly veiled threat to effectively close the feed-in tariff next year if a surge in new installations burns through the budget.

The microgeneration market is being made to pay for the previous government's over-generous dishing out of contracts to large clean energy infrastructure projects and previous mismanagement of the feed-in tariff scheme (and the industry has pointed out once again that it as calling on Ministers to tackle the initial solar deployment surge back in 2012 a full six months before they acted in a rushed manner that fell foul of the courts).

As long as the government continues to refuse to make use of the headroom in the LCF spending cap, there is no simple way to resolve this problem. It is an inherent flaw, baked into the feed-in tariff, which means solar firms that have been told repeatedly by Ministers that they are crucial to the UK's decarbonisation efforts and a vital part of a new decentralised energy vision have been condemned to years of boom and bust cycles and policy instability. That being said, it remains as clear as ever that a more measured reduction in tariffs would ease the risk of another sharp contraction in the market while minimising the impact on bills.

The second, and many ways more important, flaw in the government's proposal is the way it fits into a clean energy strategy that looks like it is about to collapse under the weight of its logical inconsistencies.

The feed-in tariff is not universally popular. There are compelling arguments in its favour to be found in the way it has helped trigger a drastic reduction in solar energy costs the pace of which is yet to be emulated by any other clean energy technology, the manner in which it has helped make clean technologies a visible and popular part of everyday life, and its potential for challenging the incumbent power of centralised utilities. You can justify feed-in tariff mechanisms as a means of seeding a market that can relatively quickly start to stand on its own two feet, as appears to be happening in other countries and as the UK industry insists is on the verge of happening here. This justification becomes stronger still if you buy the vision that energy storage and smart grid technologies are poised to make cost effective distributed power a workable reality.

But none of that can take away from the fact feed-in tariffs are expensive - manufacturers' association EEF claimed today it delivered carbon cuts at a rate of £380/tonne last year - and the system of paying for them through a levy on bills is regressive. Moreover, some experts fear that the absence of competitive auctions can result in some companies becoming inefficiently reliant on subsidies.

So, leaving aside the democratically questionable manner in which the Conservatives have once again launched proposals that promise to deal a serious blow to hundreds of green businesses just weeks after they failed to make even a passing appearance in their election manifesto, there is a case for scaling back or even axing the feed-in tariff - a case ministers could have made themselves if they had deigned to accompany this consultation with a statement.

But here is the problem for a government that is supposedly fully committed to the decarbonisation of the British economy, if you kill off the feed-in tariff and risk taking the microgeneration and distributed energy market down with it what do you replace it with?

The government's own impact assessment says its proposed changes will lead to over 6GW of anticipated renewables capacity and 1.59MT of carbon dioxide savings not being realised by 2020/21. Where are these carbon savings and the promised clean power capacity boost now going to come from? The nuclear project that is still waiting for an investment decision and will deliver power at a strike price considerably higher than either onshore wind and solar power? The CCS demonstration project that has been waiting six years for a promised funding award? The national energy efficiency programmes that have just been killed? Will they come from the big clean energy infrastructure projects that the government has just delayed by postponing the next wave of price support contracts? Or perhaps the answer lies in the fracking projects and gas plants that will supposedly push coal off the grid, but which the government can't get through the planning system and which it still needs to subsidise through a capacity mechanism?

The government urgently needs to provide a credible answer to these questions, because without them the prospect of a £6 windfall in return for a neutered renewables industry will look like an even worse deal than it does at the moment.

Further reading

Ten things you need to know about the feed-in tariff review
  • Energy
  • 27 August 2015
Feed-in Tariff cuts: the reaction
  • Policy
  • 27 August 2015
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Policy
  • Solar
  • Wind
  • Solar PV
  • Wind Turbines
  • DECC

More on Policy

The report argues central banks must redesign asset purchase schemes to take account of environment-related risks
    • Investment
UK urged to use presidency of G7 and COP26 to help 'green global finance'
    • Investment
    • 03 March 2021
    • Policy
'Single most important step': Hungary, Uruguay, and Kyoto join Powering Past Coal Alliance
    • Policy
    • 02 March 2021
Climate and environmental issues should be 'integral' to UK trade policy, independent advisors have said
    • Policy
Could a greener post-Brexit trading policy soon take shape?
    • Policy
    • 02 March 2021
Volvo's first all-electric car, the XC40 Recharge | Credit: Volvo
    • Automotive
Volvo U-turns from 'shrinking' fossil fuel car business with pledge to go all-electric by 2030
    • Automotive
    • 02 March 2021
Aberdeen is a major oil and gas hub as the jumping off point for exploration in the North Sea
    • Policy
Budget 2021: Chancellor to announce £27m to support Scotland's clean energy transition
    • Policy
    • 02 March 2021
Sunset over arable farmland in Suffolk | Credit: iStock
    • Politics
Rewriting the green growth rule book: How environmental regulation could help fast track the UK's economic recovery
    • Politics
    • 02 March 2021
The Chancellor Rishi Sunak is set to announced his Budget plans on Wednesday | Credit: HM Treasury/Flickr CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
    • Investment
Budget 2021: Treasury trails green bond launch and £22bn UK Infrastructure Bank plans
    • Investment
    • 01 March 2021
Pembroke gas power station is one of the UK's biggest emitting sites
    • Carbon Trading
UK carbon emissions trading scheme to launch in May
    • Carbon Trading
    • 01 March 2021

More news

UK urged to use presidency of G7 and COP26 to help 'green global finance'
  • Investment
UK urged to use presidency of G7 and COP26 to help 'green global finance'

Policy Exchange report details steps government could take to tackle the environmental and climate risks plaguing the global financial system

  • 03 March 2021
New Citi CEO commits bank to net zero financed emissions target on first day in role
  • Investment
New Citi CEO commits bank to net zero financed emissions target on first day in role

Firm joins Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, and JPMorgan Chase in pledging to reduce its operations and activity in line with global climate goals

  • 03 March 2021
Can the public sector drive business decarbonisation?
  • Infrastructure
Can the public sector drive business decarbonisation?

The buying power of public sector organisations can have a huge influence on the market for green products and services, writes Dr Joanne Wade from the Association for Decentralised Energy (ADE)

  • 03 March 2021
'Single most important step': Hungary, Uruguay, and Kyoto join Powering Past Coal Alliance
  • Policy
'Single most important step': Hungary, Uruguay, and Kyoto join Powering Past Coal Alliance

UK-Canada initiative welcomes 10 new members, as UN chief sets out three point plans for governments and businesses to accelerate coal power phase out

  • 02 March 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Michelin and Bridgestone accelerate green tyre innovations
Michelin and Bridgestone accelerate green tyre innovations
Deforestation for palm oil reduced ten-fold in Southeast Asia, data reveals
Deforestation for palm oil reduced ten-fold in Southeast Asia, data reveals
Plant-based fast food: Beyond Meat inks deals for McDonald's, KFC and Pizza Hut
Plant-based fast food: Beyond Meat inks deals for McDonald's, KFC and Pizza Hut
'More than affordable': Aviation could offset its way to 'carbon neutrality' with minimal impact on profitability
'More than affordable': Aviation could offset its way to 'carbon neutrality' with minimal impact on profitability
Mark Carney responds to mounting criticism of 'net zero' claims
Mark Carney responds to mounting criticism of 'net zero' claims
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Incisive Footer Logo

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading