Green groups have criticised a set of measures announced by the White House last week in an attempt to limit the environmental damage caused by mountaintop removal mining.
The Natural Resource Defense Council said that a memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed between a number of government agencies last week does not go far enough to address the environmental risks associated with controversial mountaintop removal mining.
The White House's Council on Environment Quality announced that the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of the Interior, had committed to implementing a range of environmental protection measures by the end of the year, including providing better guidance on how they evaluate the environmental effects of projects, and improving oversight on water pollution permits in areas affected by mining.
However, NRDC senior scientist Dr Allen Hershkowitz warned that "unspecified references to strengthening permit reviews provides no assurance that the administration will end this abhorrent practice soon".
He added that the Army Corps of Engineers is still able to permit the huge stream fills associated with some mountaintop removal projects.
However, in the MoU the Corps promised to issue a proposal within 30 days to modify Nationwide Permit 21, making it impossible to use the permit to grant the discharge of fill materials into streams.
Hershkowitz added that the administration should instead signal its support for legislation designed to effectively ban mountaintop removal mining. "There are bi-partisan bills in Congress right now - the Clean Water Protection Act in the House and the Appalachia Restoration Act in the Senate - that would also help end mountaintop removal, and we look to the administration to push for legislation that ends mountaintop removal," he said.
The issue is particularly contentious at present, given the recent EPA approval of 42 controversial mountaintop removal projects in Appalachia.
Mountaintop removal involves exploding mountain tops to reveal previously inaccessible coal seams. Environmentalists decry the activity because of its tendency to spread pollutants across mountain environments, contaminating drinking water and other resources. They had hoped that the Obama administration would move to limit the practice, but were left disappointed by the decision to approve the new projects.
Green groups furious over administration's failure to block controversial mountaintop mining projects 22 May 2009
Moderate Democrats and Republicans increasingly confident they can secure the 60 votes needed to pass cap-and-trade legislation 14 Dec 2009
But agency signals that it will undertake gradual rollout of new carbon-permitting regulations 24 Feb 2010
Virginia senator tables bill that would stop the EPA regulating power station emissions for two years 05 Mar 2010Landmark ruling strengthens Obama's hand as he tries to force through climate change bill 20 Apr 2009
Desert tortoise fears allayed? 19 Mar 2010Cameron presents pre-election energy policy, promising greater investment certainty for low-carbon projects, green loans for households, and streamlining of planning system 19 Mar 2010
Joint statement from carbon exchange and Hungarian government aims to restore confidence in CER market 19 Mar 2010
More news
From climate change contrarians to the "KitKatastrophe" of Nestle's palm oil policy, we look at the best the green web has to offer this week 19 Mar 2010
"It needs the political enthusiasm that was behind the war on terror after 9/11" 19 Mar 2010
From the government's plans for a marine energy revolution to John Lewis' proposals for an off-grid supermarket 19 Mar 2010 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
