The Executive Board of the UN's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has this week agreed to strengthen many of the standards and procedures that govern the controversial carbon offset scheme in an attempt to better ensure that only credible emission reduction projects are allowed to take part.
Following a scandal late last year that saw the CDM's top project verifier, Det Norske Veritas (DNV), suspended from checking emission reduction initiatives after it uncovered flaws in its auditing processes that saw one individual approve projects they had not inspected, the CDM has announced strengthened standards and streamlined procedures for accreditation of the third-party certifiers that vet CDM project activities.
Under the changes, verifiers or designated operational entities (DOEs) – as they are officially referred to – will be subject to random spot checks from the board rather than scheduled inspections.
A spokesman for the CDM Executive Board said that the move would not only make the scheme more robust, it would also speed up the accreditation of certifiers helping to tackle the backlog of CDM projects awaiting third-party approval.
"The quality of the projects is key and the emission reductions have to be real, measurable, verifiable and additional," he said. "These changes are part of an ongoing process to improve the robustness and efficiency of the scheme."
In addition to the new random testing of verifiers, the board has agreed to adopt new rules on the requirements that must be met before industrial gas facilities can qualify as CDM projects.
The qualification of large-scale industrial plants such as refineries or power plants that use more efficient technologies as emission reduction projects has been one of the most controversial components of the CDM, with critics claiming funds that should support green projects is being diverted to fossil fuel industries in the developing world.
However, the CDM is now looking to address concerns that such projects fail to deliver significant emission reductions through a new baseline and monitoring methodology designed to help ensure emission reductions are genuine.
The board also discussed the need to develop procedures for addressing situations where projects that have been approved by the CDM then differ from the original description that gained them entry to the scheme. It agreed to consider proposals for tackling the issue at its next meeting.
Second suspension of official emission project verifier within a year highlights flaws in UN's flagship offsetting scheme 14 Sep 2009
But expert warns UN offset market could still be heading for investment crisis 23 Dec 2009
Negotiations back underway as Danish hosts signal that talks should proceed based on UN draft texts 17 Dec 2009
Report argues carbon offset mechanisms are beyond reform and should be scrapped 02 Jun 2009From flaws with the CDM to fears over Copenhagen, we run down the week's top stories 18 Sep 2009
Cameron presents pre-election energy policy, promising greater investment certainty for low-carbon projects, green loans for households, and streamlining of planning system 19 Mar 2010Joint statement from carbon exchange and Hungarian government aims to restore confidence in CER market 19 Mar 2010
Pilot project aims to establish the provenance of tin and other metals exported from the war-torn Democratic Republic of Congo 19 Mar 2010
More news
As a journalist, I spend a fair amount of time defending the much maligned media industry to friends and family.... 18 Mar 2010
Andrew Williams casts his eye over some of the most popular green driving aids on the market 16 Mar 2010
From hydropower hot spots to record-breaking Texan winds, we run down the top stories from the past week 12 Mar 2010 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
