The meeting of major economies convened in Paris last week ended in deadlock with delegates again split on whether to set a target to halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
The meeting of the world's 17 largest polluters – which formed part of a series of conferences instigated last year by the US to run parallel to UN climate change talks – ended with delegates agreeing on the urgent need for action on climate change, but split on the best policy mechanisms to adopt to curb emissions.
Daniel Price, US deputy national security advisor for international economic affairs, told reporters at the conference that "significant progress" had been made at the talks with delegates largely agreed on the need to share clean technologies and increasingly willing to consider sectoral emission reduction goals for carbon intensive industries such as steel and cement.
However, negotiators were again at loggerheads over proposals for a binding target to cut emissions by 50 per cent by 2050.
The EU, Japan and Canada have all been lobbying hard for such a target to be set, but representatives of developing economies at the talks said they would not sign up to such a goal until they see more action from the US to cut emissions. The US, for its part, has said it is still giving serious consideration to the proposed target, but has repeatedly resisted calls from the international community to set emissions goals.
In an attempt to break the deadlock, delegates agreed to two further meetings ahead of the next scheduled meeting in July, which is to be held alongside the G8 summit in Japan.
The Paris talks closed as the leaders of 18 US states signed an agreement at a meeting at Yale University to step up pressure on the presidential candidates to ensure they are all ready to deliver a significant toughening of US climate policy as soon as the eventual winner of this November's election takes up residence in the White House.
According to the agreement, California, Illinois, Florida, New York and 14 other states will "reach out to major presidential candidates as a means of shaping the first 100 days of the next administration", on climate policy.
Speaking at the conference, California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said that "President McCain, President Obama, President Clinton would all shift this country to a much higher level on climate change," adding that rapid changes in the US position on climate change could be delivered as soon as the first half of next year.
Rich nations need to cut CO2 emissions 90 per cent, says national think-tank 17 Sep 2009
Obama administration moves forward with fuel efficiency rules, as Democrats hint that climate bill vote could be put back to 2010 16 Sep 2009But commitment to cut emissions by 80 per cent is overshadowed by continuing stand-off with emerging powers 09 Jul 2009
Conditional backing for EU funding proposal offered, in return for Chinese concessions on greenhouse gas emissions transparency 17 Dec 2009
Last ditch effort to salvage agreement as Obama meets with Wen Jiabao 18 Dec 2009
Desert tortoise fears allayed? 19 Mar 2010
Cameron presents pre-election energy policy, promising greater investment certainty for low-carbon projects, green loans for households, and streamlining of planning system 19 Mar 2010
Joint statement from carbon exchange and Hungarian government aims to restore confidence in CER market 19 Mar 2010
More news
From climate change contrarians to the "KitKatastrophe" of Nestle's palm oil policy, we look at the best the green web has to offer this week 19 Mar 2010
"It needs the political enthusiasm that was behind the war on terror after 9/11" 19 Mar 2010
From the government's plans for a marine energy revolution to John Lewis' proposals for an off-grid supermarket 19 Mar 2010 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
