President Bush yesterday set a goal to curb growth in US carbon emissions over the next twenty years, but earned further condemnation from environmentalists for failing to provide sufficient details on how this target would be attained.
In a heavily trailed speech, Bush set a goal of 2025 for slowing carbon emissions growth in the US to zero, arguing for declining emissions after that. However, the targets were predicated on other countries matching that commitment, he said.
He outlined a plan for aggregating incentives for different energy types, including nuclear power, into a single programme, which would then weight incentives according to their emissions.
Bush emphasised his support for a voluntary incentive-based scheme rather than regulatory measures. He also took a thinly veiled swipe at the proposed Lieberman-Warner Act, which aims to tackle climate change through binding emission targets and comprehensive cap-and-trade systems, warning Congress against over-regulating industry.
"Bad legislation would impose tremendous costs on our economy and on American families without accomplishing the important climate change goals we share," he said. "The wrong way is to raise taxes, duplicate mandates, or demand sudden and drastic emissions cuts that have no chance of being realised and every chance of hurting our economy."
Last October, the Climate Security Act 2007 was introduced by Senators Joe Lieberman and John Warner, demanding a freeze on emissions growth by 2012 and a 62 per cent reduction by 2050.
Greenpeace US executive director John Passacant argued that other regions have already exceeded the goals Bush stated yesterday. "Stopping growth in US emissions by 2025 is completely inconsistent with what scientists say is necessary to stop catastrophic global warming," he said. "In fact, Europe has agreed to reduce its emissions 20 per cent and pledged to cut 30 per cent by 2020 if the US makes a comparable commitment. The time has come to look beyond President Bush and towards the next occupant of the White House for leadership and vision on global warming."
Bush will likely take the broad plan to a G8 meeting in July, where leaders will discuss a framework for curbing carbon emissions following Kyoto's expiration in 2012.
Lieberman-Warner blocked in Senate, but with Presidential candidates signalling support for bill green groups insist cap-and-trade legislation could be passed next year 09 Jun 2008
In a last-ditch attempt to save his environmental legacy, the US president is today expected to set out new goals for cutting carbon emissions 16 Apr 2008Bill proposing binding carbon cuts and extensive emissions trading scheme passes key first vote 02 Nov 2007
US cap-and-trade scheme all but inevitable as all three runners in presidential race endorse trading mechanism 13 May 2008
Study from Environmental Defense Fund claims Lieberman-Warner bill would cost average US household less than a penny on the dollar 23 Apr 2008
Intelligent Energy ramps up funding for R&D and partnerships 04 Jul 2008
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
More news
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
