04 Nov 2011
Greenhouse gases have leapt to their highest level ever, breaching a worst-case scenario outlined by climate experts four years ago, and heaping pressure on businesses and governments to get to grips with runaway emissions.
Figures from the US Department of Energy show that world output of CO2 rose six per cent – or 512 million metric tonnes – from 2009 to 2010, which represents a total only slightly lower than the individual emissions of China, India or the US.
Gregg Marland, a professor of geology at Appalachian State University, told Associated Press (AP) that almost half of the "monster" rise could be attributed to extra emissions in China and the US.
People were travelling more in 2010, and there was a ramping up of manufacturing, he said.
"It's a big jump," Tom Boden, director of the energy department's Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center at Oak Ridge National Lab, told AP. "From an emissions standpoint, the global financial crisis seems to be over."
He added that the figures put global emissions higher than the worst case projections made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007, which forecast that global temperatures would increase between 2.4ºC and 6.4ºC by the end of the century, with 4ºC being the best estimate.
Perhaps the one consolation from the data was that those countries that signed up to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol have reduced their overall emissions from about 60 per cent of the world total to 50 per cent and met the goal of cutting emissions to about eight per cent below 1990 levels.
The figures are a stark reminder to countries attending the Durban Climate Summit later this month of the importance of tying the US, China and India into a new international treaty.
"We really need to get the developing world, because if we don't the problem is going to be running away from us," University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver said. "And the problem is pretty close to running away from us."
This week China has taken another step towards tackling emissions by banning imports and sales of incandescent lightbulbs of 100W or higher from October next year as part of a five-year plan to phase out the technology.
The ban will extend to 60W bulbs from October 2014, and 15W bulbs from 2016, subject to a review closer to the time.
China's main planning agency said the move would save 48 billion kilowatt hours of power per year and reduce CO2 emissions by 48 million tonnes annually once the bulbs are phased out.
The impact is likely to spread abroad, too: while China produced 3.85 billion incandescent lightbulbs last year, only 1.07 billion were sold domestically.
The US will ban the making and sale of incandescent lightbulbs beginning in 2012, while the EU agreed in 2008 to phase out the bulbs by 2012.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Market has failed to provide sufficient new capacity to deal with increase in demand, energy minister warns
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
Service provider builds a compact, energy-efficient and scalable IT infrastructure
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Are you sure of your figures?
I am confused by these figures. 512 MT is not surely not 6% of 2009 emissions. That would make global emissions just 8.5GT, while they are nearly 50GT for all GHG. Not only that but 512MT is WAY lower than the individual emissions of the USA or China (it is about the same as Iran)... Am I missing something?
Posted by TheMushyPea, 04 Nov 2011