08 Nov 2010
EU officials have confirmed they will move to address controversial carbon credits that "game" the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and undermine the effectiveness of the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS) before the end of the month.
Currently, companies covered by the ETS can use UN-approved carbon offset credits known as Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) to help them cut their emissions.
But a series of investigations have alleged that companies based in China and India and South and Central America are "gaming" the CDM scheme by increasing the production of HCFC-22 and HFC-23, two powerful greenhouse gases, so that they can then earn extra CER credits by destoying the gas.
The resulting CERs have then allegedly been sold into the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, despite the fact that they have not delivered any real net reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
Jos Delbeke, the director general of European Commission's climate team, told Reuters in an interview late last week that the EU was preparing to act to tackle the practice.
"We see there's a gaming of the system, where people are tuning up or down the production of these industrial gases to maximize their credits," he said. " The proposal on reforming these credits will be on the table before the Cancun meeting, and discussions among EU member states are going to start before Cancun."
Delbeke did not mention specific CDM projects, but his comments will further fuel specualtion that the EU is preparing to ban offsets issued by HFC-23, adipic acid and nitrous acid emission reduction projects from 2013.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT CARBON TRADING
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The Labour leader has said little on the topic of climate change or green growth since securing the post
INSIGHT
NEWSLETTER
INSIGHT
This new handbook explores practices that allow organisations to overcome their technological limitations and traditional office-culture challenges - freeing employees to do more with less from wherever they want to.
The centralised printers used in many businesses are wasteful, unreliable and expensive to run - just as their suppliers intend
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment