20 Jan 2009
The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is not fit for purpose and must be reformed if global emissions reduction targets are to be met, according to senior banking leaders gathered at this week's World Future Energy Summit in Abu Dhabi.
Caio Koch Weser, vice chairman of Deutsche Bank group and a former German minister, led the criticism of the UN-backed carbon trading scheme, which allows businesses and governments in developed countries to invest in emissions reduction schemes in the developing world in return for carbon credits, arguing that the market was proving too inefficient.
"Financing abatement in the developing world is key and the CDM is well established to do that but it is very expensive and inefficient," he said. "One of the key issues at Copenhagen this year will be reforming the CDM into a scaled-up programmatic approach."
This means that instead of a single project-by-project approach to gaining UN accreditation, projects are grouped into programmes of work that could be registered at the same time, streamlining the accreditation process and allowing them to issue and sell UN-approved certified emission reduction (CERs) credits far quicker.
For example, hydroenergy projects currently have to be registered as individual projects and go through a lengthy accreditation process that typically requires a number of different individual project co-ordinators for different regions. A scaled-up programmatic approach would see them all grouped under one application, streamlining the approval process.
Green groups have argued that the UN is already guilty of granting accreditation to projects that fail to deliver promised emission cuts and fear that any attempts to streamline the accreditation process would make it easier for ineffective projects to issue carbon credits.
But those calling for reform counter that there is an urgent need to increase the scale of the CDM market and this can only be done through an improved accreditation process. So far the scheme has generated about 135 million tonnes of CO2 reduction – a figure experts calculate must rise to four gigatonnes if the world is to aim for a 450ppm concentration of CO2.
"The CDM has serious limitations and is very bureaucratic," said Koch Weser. "We need a quantum jump in the way it operates to get to four gigatonnes."
Jean-Eric Molinard, adviser to the World Bank on reducing gas flaring around the world, said reforms to the CDM accreditation process would make it easier for the Bank to invest in emissions reduction projects. "A programmatic approach would work very well for us," he said.
However, Bjorn Stigson, president of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, said that CDM has already become too complex for reform and alternative approaches need to be considered.
"Trying to reform the CDM is like pushing water uphill," he said. "What we need is new mechanisms – it is too complicated to undo what has been done in the CDM."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT CARBON TRADING
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Model X sports Back to the Future-style "falcon doors" and is set to go on sale in 2014
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Criticizing is easy. Proposing something better is not so easy.
What those bankers and businessmen know about CDM? One thing I learned in life is that, in order to criticize something, you must: a) know what you are talking about (I mean, the technical aspects of the mechanism itself); b) have a suggestion to replace what is not working properly according to your opinion. by this article we can see that none of those letters are complied with. How sad for the businessmen...
Posted by Felipe, 21 Jan 2009
CDM Reform & Hidden Agendas
There is one continent that has yet to ?enjoy? the ?benefits? of CDM: Africa. Good to see that Deutsche Bank (DB) mentions this small region. The focus of the EU is CDM reform with the aim of having far more CDM projects in Africa. I would suggest that DB (and its acolytes) have a hidden agenda here ? not using CDM for abatement purposes but expanding it for trading purposes (DB has an active Carbon Trading unit). Furthermore, the move to Africa would make it more difficult to make money from CDM (a key aim for DB ? unless it has reformed itself into a charity?). Taking the example of hydro projects: is DB saying that in a given region all hydro projects are the same? Thought not. Beware of people and companies with hidden agendas.
Posted by Mike Parr, 20 Jan 2009