17 Aug 2010
Chris Huhne has today hit back at reports suggesting the government is watering down its commitment to phase out the UK's dirtiest power plants, insisting the government remains fully committed to banning new coal-fired power stations built without carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology.
Writing in a letter to the Guardian in response to yesterday's front page story claiming that the UK's dirtiest coal plants have won a government reprieve, the energy and climate change secretary said the "idea that we are watering down our commitment is simply incorrect".
He also pledged that the coalition would not allow any new coal power station to be built without being equipped with CSS technology.
The Guardian report (which was republished on BusinessGreen.com) said government sources had confirmed the coalition would not bring forward legislation in the autumn that would introduce an emissions performance standard requiring all new coal power plants to install CCS technology.
It added that the government would instead launch a consultation on the proposals in the autumn to be followed by a white paper in the new year – a delay that green groups warned raised the possibility of new unabated coal-fired power stations "slipping through the system".
In his letter Huhne said the suggestion that coal plants would be approved without CCS was ludicrous, adding that the new emission performance standard would make it impossible for coal power plants to meet the standard without CCS technology.
He provided no further insight on when the emissions performance standard would be introduced, but insisted it remained a top priority for the government.
"We are moving as quickly as possible and our consultation on a radical reform of the electricity market to deliver secure, affordable and low-carbon energy will be out within six months of the election while a white paper will be published within a year," he said.
However, the proposed new rules continue to face opposition from some in the energy industry who fear that CCS technologies are too immature to be deployed at scale and as such the UK is running the risk of a severe energy shortage in the second half of the decade as old coal and nuclear power plants are phased out.
A number of Conservative backbenchers are also known to be opposed to the proposals, fearing that they could drive up energy bills and tilt the energy market further in favour of renewable energy projects.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT LEGISLATION
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Everyone welcomes Greg Barker’s pledge to grow the solar industry, but with the small print promising to shrink the sector this year firms are divided on how to respond
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
coalportal
The use of sophisticated software systems for coal mining that is mostly burnt for power generation and steel production and adds to the greenhouse effect is valid for western countries who may allocate resources and funds to alternative and more greener sources of power. Some of the alternatives may be "safer" than the traditional mines. Unfortunately, coal statistics show developing economies are more likely to increase their use of thermal coal & metallurgical coal in coming years because of its affordability and to meet increasing demands for electricity and steel. Whether they will embrace and utilise sophisticated software systems that no doubt add to the cost of production is yet to be seen. Cherry of www.coalportal.com
Posted by coalportal, 12 Oct 2011