22 Apr 2009
Tom Delay, chief executive, The Carbon Trust
"This budget is good news for carbon reduction. The Government announcement today to provide the Carbon Trust with an extra £165 million of interest free loans to be made available to business and the public sector to expand existing energy efficiency programmes is most welcome... [It] represents a four-fold increase in our current loans programme for the public and private sector. Overall it will cut £40 million from the UK's annual energy bill and deliver a quarter of a million tonnes of additional carbon dioxide savings a year."
Stephen Hale, director, Green Alliance
"This is only a small step for mankind, but it is a big leap for HM Treasury. This Budget contained much more than an abysmal Pre-Budget report. But there's a very long way to go. There are a daunting backlog of issues that need resolution now in order to sustain the government's claim that it is finally delivering on their rhetorical commitment to the low-carbon economy. Other countries, notably the US, have done more in recent months."
Lisa Harker, Co-Director, Institute of Public Policy Research
"In terms of the environmental measures, the Government’s commitment to support up to four Carbon Capture and Storage projects is a big step forward: it now needs to set out rapidly how these projects will be funded and delivered. The Government has also signed up to an ambitious emissions reduction target for 2020 and has made a welcome commitment to being a world leader in low carbon technologies. However, this scale of ambition is not matched by the level of new investment in low carbon development that will result from this budget – particularly in relation to what other leading countries are doing."
Jeremy Leggett, Executive Chairman, Solarcentury
"This budget gets us on the road with a green new deal in the UK. In the context of significant tightening elsewhere in the budget, the sums made available for subsidies, loans, investment funds and capital allowances in energy efficiency and renewables can make a difference, and create many jobs. Industry and government now needs to pull together to execute. We have some catching up to do."
Philip Wolfe, Director General of the REA
"The economic storm clouds are clearly thundering through this budget, but at least they have a green lining. We are glad the government has sought to respond to areas we identified as critical and these measures should help prevent contraction in the renewables industry."
David Symons, Director at WSP
"This first carbon budget – covering the period 2008 to 2012 - has limited ambition and is set at a level that the UK should already be able to meet with ease. This means that long term carbon targets continue to be aspirational, and the really tough decisions on moving to a low carbon economy continue to be put off to the future. The first carbon budget commits the UK to emit no more than 3,018 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent gases over the five years between 2008 and 2012. This equates to around 600 million tonnes CO2e for each of the five years. The UK emitted 637million tonnes of CO2e gases in 2007 – a 1.7 per cent reduction on 2006. The 2008-2012 budget will be met if the UK continues this 1.7% per year carbon reduction – a reduction achieved in a growing economy and before the major stimulus of today's budget have been announced."
Ben Warren, head of renewable energy at Ernst & Young
"The Chancellor's announcement to provide additional incentives to support the development of offshore wind farms in the UK will be welcomed by industry. But the government has placed a big bet on an industry that is still in the early stages of development. And the stakes are high, not only does offshore have a large role to play in the UK meeting its renewable energy targets, but it also has the potential to provide long term sustainable employment in terms of marine construction and maintenance services. Whether the level of support is enough and the money will filter through to benefit UK plc is as yet uncertain, however after many months of positive sounds emanating from Whitehall, firm action is welcome."
National Grid, Chief Executive, Steve Holliday
"CCS has the potential to bring about a massive reduction in the UK’s carbon dioxide emissions, and at the same time play a big part in keeping our energy supplies secure...The next step for Government is to focus on how the carbon dioxide will get from the power stations to the offshore storage fields. CCS clusters – power stations in the same area sharing a pipeline network – make simple common sense compared to the wasteful alternative of each power station building their own separate pipeline. National Grid is keen to deploy its gas pipeline expertise in this area, but it needs the right regulatory framework."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT LEGISLATION
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Solar sector warns proposed cuts to feed-in tariffs would make it impossible for them to deliver promised rates of return
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Green folly fuel poverty and black outs
This excellent article gives us a measure of the green folly that will drive Britons into fuel poverty and black outs, and the economy into depression : http://tinyurl.com/ycqx64l Sunday Telegraph 10 Jan 2010 'Climate change: the true price of the warmists' folly is becoming clear' From the Met Office's mistakes to Gordon Brown's wind farms, the cost of 'green' policies is growing, warns Christopher Booker.
Posted by Barbara Durkin, 11 Jan 2010
Delivering Environmentally Sustainable IT
With Alastair Darling announcing a renewed focus on green technology in this year?s Budget, as part of the government?s ambition to cut the UK?s carbon emissions by 34% by 2020, there is a realisation that every business needs to consider its carbon footprint. By utilising virtualisation technology across the data centre companies can now dramatically reduce power consumption by reducing the number of physical machines and associated air conditioning. In addition, the latest thin client devices that are used in a virtual desktop environment require at most 30% of the power of the PCs they replace ? and that includes the proportion of server power they require. They are highly recyclable and have a far longer lifespan, reducing the lifetime acquisition and disposal costs. But greener IT is not just about reassessing the IT infrastructure to drive down the carbon impact; it is about working practices. For example, would home or remote working reduce employee travel significantly? Can video conferencing cut down travel to meetings? And can hot-desking significantly reduce the desktop infrastructure? Critically, with the right approach, sustainable business is not just about meeting targets and being seen to be green but actually adopting efficient, well managed processes that deliver quantifiable benefit to the bottom line.
Posted by Chris de Silva, Managing Director, NEC Philips Unified Solutions, 29 Apr 2009
UK Leading the World in Carbon Capture - the other side of the story
Carbon capture is making a very big problem indeed for future generations to come and where these generations will look on these decisions as inept thinking of the highest standing, just as the last 12 years of New Labour. Sudden leaching and escape of vast quantities of carbon dioxide into the sea and atmosphere would be catastrophic for all those countries living near to the leak, and for that matter the whole world. As this carbon would be under significant pressure, there are no guarantees of long-term stability forever. Movements in the sea bed and tectonic plates, which are constantly shifting, could quite easily rupture and shatter a pressure vessel. In this respect, earthquakes have no respect for anything. Fish life would be destroyed on an unimaginable scale, not to say human life. There is also the future possibility of terrorist or aggressive attacks that could hold the country to ransom. A strategic bomb could make release inevitable. Indeed, the release of killer gases to human and living organs based upon nature, would be like creating a world in an instant of immense pollution. In this respect possibly the release of decades of life-killing pollutants within an instant. No one can guarantee anything forever and that is the big hole in this strategy here. Indeed, nothing ever has as the history of the world has shown. Why is it therefore that government always listens to the biggest lobby groups, the rich and powerful who will reap hundreds of billions out of this eventual disastrous state for others to address and solve (if they can) in the future. It is another example that 'New Labour' has rushed out to be seen as saviours but where, par for the course, they will dispatch possibly millions to a devastating state of affairs. When therefore will they learn that when corporates are involved, profits are even above human life itself. New Labour say they are leading the world. But my question is what world. It appears to be one of increasing global problems for the future and not saving humanity now. Dr David Hill World Innovation Foundation Charity United Kingdom P O Box A60, Huddersfield, HD1 1XJ, United Kingdom Switzerland The World Innovation Foundation Charity Advokaturbro Gubler Walther Leuch Marktgasse 38, Postfach, CH-3000 Bern 7, Switzerland Kazakhstan WIF-KZ Office Dyman Hotel, 16th Floor, 2A, Turan Avenue, Astana, 010000, ROK
Posted by dr david hill, 24 Apr 2009