BP shrugs off anti-tar sands shareholder resolution

Shareholders vote against resolution calling for rethink of tar sands policy, but 15 per cent refuse to back BP's position

By Danny Bradbury

16 Apr 2010

Comments: 1

Tar sands development

Oil giant BP shrugged off a shareholder resolution requiring it to review its Sunrise tar sands project in Alberta at its annual general meeting yesterday – although not without a significant voter swing against its controversial tar sands policy.

Prior to the meeting, the company said that 94 per cent of shareholders voting in advance had rejected the resolution, which was bought by a group of ethical shareholders including the California Public Employees' Retirement System, and Co-operative Investments.

The resolution, filed in January, questioned the financial viability of the project, which involves an carbon and energy-intensive oil extraction process using the bitumen retrieved from tar sands in the Canadian province of Alberta. BP, which also published its Sustainability Review yesterday, has a 50 per cent stake in the Sunrise project, which could produce 200,000 barrels of tar sands oil each day by 2012.

"Financial concerns include questions about whether future oil prices will be high enough to outweigh the high costs of producing tar sands, installing carbon capture and storage and expected carbon emissions costs," said FairPensions, a responsible investment campaign that backed the resolution. "Investors working with FairPensions think that BP and Shell's financial assumptions may be too optimistic," it added.

However, the final outcome after the meeting showed that fewer shareholders had been against the resolution than BP had thought. In total, 622,272,418 voted for the resolution, 9,497,638,714 voted against, and 1,020,301,075 abstained.

"The fact that 15 per cent of the shareholders refused to back the company's position is significant," said Greenpeace climate and energy campaigner Melina Laboucan-Massimo.

"There will be continued pressure on BP for making the decision to get involved in the tar sands, given that it said it was going to be 'beyond petroleum'," she continued, referring to the company's much-criticised branding strategy.

Greenpeace and other environmental groups have organised a concerted protest against BP's tar sands involvement over the past two weeks, culminating in activity taking place in Calgary, Alberta's capital, yesterday. Similar protests occurred in London outside BP's annual general meeting.

Last week, the Duncan First Nation and Horse Lake First Nation Native American communities in Alberta successfully applied to the Supreme Court of Canada to address tar sands activity, claiming that it violates treaties signed with the Canadian government.

Reports that BP had delayed the controversial project in spite of the shareholder vote were erroneous, according to spokespeople at the company's Alberta office.

Activists will now be looking forward to the annual general meeting of Royal Dutch Shell, to be held on May 18. A similar shareholder resolution has been filed for discussion at that event.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment

  

Greg Barker has said that despite cuts to solar incentives the industry will continue to grow this year - is he right?

8%

7%

9%

76%

INSIGHT

Submit your email address and we'll send a link to a personal newsletter control panel


Hardware Engineer / Electroni

10 Feb 2012

Hardware Engineer FPGA,VHDL,Embedded C,PCB Layout,Orcad My client a leading design and manufacturing company is looking for an experienced hardware engineer, electronic engineer. This forward thinking organisation will create ample opportunities for the right Hardware electronics engineer. The Hardware Engineer will design, implement, evaluate and verify complete data acquisition systems and the s

APC

Guidelines for specification of data centre power density

The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres

Quocirca

Powering the data centre

A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres