13 Aug 2009
The stand-off over emission reduction targets may remain stuck in deadlock, but UN climate change talks in Bonn this week are delivering progress towards a deal on how best to halt tropical deforestation.
Speaking to BusinessGreen.com, Federica Bietta, deputy director of the Coalition for Rainforest Nations (CfRN), said that talks to condense the 20 pages of draft negotiating text that cover the so-called Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD) programme were proceeding well.
"We should get it down to 10 pages," she said. "We are seeing a lot of areas of agreement that include both developed and developing countries… there is a much stronger consensus in the room on this than there are on some of the other issues."
Bietta said there was widespread support for proposals for the three-phase rollout of REDD through the scaling up of forestry management authorities and measurement mechanisms in rainforest countries, the deployment of demonstration forestry protection projects, and the access to carbon markets to help finance projects.
She added that some contention remained about whether projects should be financed through rainforest funds or the carbon market, with countries such as Brazil sceptical about the role of carbon credits. But she argued that issuing carbon credits through a new REDD scheme would represent the best way of raising the scale of finance that is required to reverse deforestation.
"We know that if we are to have access to carbon market projects, we will have to adhere to higher standards of auditing and management," she said. "But we believe access to the market is the best way to get the financing at the required scale."
CfRN also downplayed fears that a glut of forestry-based carbon credits could distort the global carbon market, insisting that the emergence of REDD projects would be staggered.
"There have been concerns that REDD would create too many credits, but it will take years for all the countries involved to measure deforestation accurately and start introducing projects," Bietta said. "Some countries such as Papua New Guinea and Indonesia have already been working on REDD for a few years and could introduce projects quite quickly, while some other countries could take five years to get their first project up and running."
However, she added that the coalition remained concerned about the progress of the wider negotiations, particularly on the subject of emission targets. " New Zealand has announced a target to cut emissions by 10 per cent by 2020 and the recent targets from Japan are not much better," she said. "We are very concerned about this level of ambition from developed countries."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT CARBON TRADING
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Model X sports Back to the Future-style "falcon doors" and is set to go on sale in 2014
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Don't demonize deforestation!
One must understand deforestation before stating to argue against... http://tinyurl.com/mxaw83 Johan Haderer
Posted by Johan Haderer, 25 Aug 2009
Forest carbon trading will be a disaster
The Coalition for Rainforest Nations' Federica Biette says ""Some countries such as Papua New Guinea and Indonesia have already been working on REDD for a few years and could introduce projects quite quickly, while some other countries could take five years to get their first project up and running." Yes, and look what's happened as a result (see http://tinyurl.com/oobqex ). Allowing forestry credits into the carbon markets would not only drive down the price of carbon and make clean technologies uneconomics, it would also unleash a tidal wave of corruption, graft, land-grabs, bad governance and as Interpol has already warned, organised international criminality. The rich world should pay to help protect the world's remaining rainforests, but carbon trading is not the way to do it.
Posted by Robin Webster, 13 Aug 2009
Misinformation regarding REDD - this arcticle does not reflect reality in Bonn
Dear sirs. The article above does absolutely not reflect the outcomes from UNFCCC Bonn talks. I have been there for the whole week following REDD meetings and there was absolutely not the outcome Mrs. Federica says it had. What happened in Bonn along this week was only the better organisation of the negotiation text (paragraphs 106-128 of the Annex to FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/INF.1). The only additional text in the REDD part o fthe package was the addition of 4 paragraphs, one of those saying: "Considering the serious risk of reversion inherent to REDD actions in developing countriy Parties, such actions should not be linked to quantified emission limitations or reduction objectives (QELROS) of developed country Parties, and should not be addressed under market-oriented approaches which could undermine the environmental integrity of the global GHG emission reduction goal." This is in the negotiation text and reflects exactly the negotiation position of several Parties at the UNFCCC negotiations. Therefore, it is an absolute surprise that Mrs. Federica comes to the public and mentione that there was an agreement on a market oriented approahce for REDD. She was there, she has the text in her hands and she understands that what is quoted in this article in Business Green does not reflect at all the outcomes of Bonn talks. At present stage, a market mechanism seems to be not the preferred solution to reduce defoerstation and the consequent emissions in developing countries.
Posted by Adrian Charlton, 16 Aug 2009