24 Aug 2009
Countries across the EU will begin to phase out the use of traditional light bulbs from next week, in a move designed to cut CO2 emissions by one million tonnes a year by 2020.
The Eco Design of Energy-using Products Directive was passed last December and will restrict the manufacture and import of frosted incandescent light bulbs over the next three years before imposing a full ban in 2012.
Under the legislation, 100W light bulbs will be banned from 1 September, with lower wattages targeted one by one over the next three years.
Environment minister Dan Norris welcomed the introduction of the ban, predicting that it will help to accelerate the UK's efforts to phase out inefficient light bulbs.
"We are glad the EU has put this measure in place to stop the waste of energy and money from old-fashioned, high-energy bulbs," he said. "The UK has had a successful voluntary initiative in place for a few years, and now the rest of the EU will follow suit on a mandatory basis."
Under a voluntary initiative, retailers in the UK have already begun to remove 150W and 100W bulbs from shelves and plan to remove all old-fashioned bulbs by 2011, a year ahead of the EU schedule.
The ban has attracted criticism from some quarters, with the Daily Mail launching a campaign earlier this year to save traditional light bulbs and some critics raising questions over the safety of the more efficient compact fluourescent lamp (CFL).
However, Defra stressed that nobody would be forced to change the bulbs in their house and that all retailers would be given the chance to sell out existing stocks.
The government also insisted that there were strong environmental and economic reasons for switching to more efficient bulbs, noting that traditional light bulbs waste 95 per cent of their energy as heat and that each CFL delivers annual energy bill savings of between £3 and £6 per lamp.
Concerns over the health risks presented by the mercury present in CFLs were downplayed, with Defra insisting that all local councils already provide recycling facilities for CFLs.
A report from industry body the Lighting Association earlier this month said the EU regulations are likely to lead to wider adoption of innovative low-energy lighting technologies, such as halogen bulbs and LEDs.
"There is a flood of new lamps coming on to the market and new opportunities for luminaire design," the report said.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT LEGISLATION
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Solar sector warns proposed cuts to feed-in tariffs would make it impossible for them to deliver promised rates of return
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Nice thinking but...
Did anyone think about the nordic countries where in the winter there can be daylight for just a couple of hours in the day. The CFS lights fail to work in under -20degrees C. If one gets a CFL to light up, it will take 30 min until the light has heated up enough to actually light its surroundings. LED:s are as good as a candle for outside. I can bet no one came to think of the heating normal bulbs also provide as an indirect source for heating. (For this kind of thinking they should forbid AC in southern europe)..
Posted by Rips, 20 Sep 2011
Nice thinking but...
How about the nordic (read arctic) countries where in the winter there is light about 2hours a day, and CFL:s don't work under -20C? Did anyone count the heating traditional lights contribute in the normal heating? (Should forbid the AC in southern eu for this)...
Posted by Rips, 20 Sep 2011
Tyranny and neglience.
This is a gross insult to freedom and Capitalism, and cruel to the poor, given suitable replacements (area LEDs lights) are not yet available at economic cost, and CFLs are not a safe or economic substitute. The EU supports the sale of CFLs, but should ban them given their toxic content (e.g. Mercury); this negligence could lead to pollution and poisoning suits, and the EU being regarded as a negligent and complicit party, by a class action suit.
Posted by Keythong, 18 Apr 2010
More legislation.
Please, please stop telling us what we can and can't use. Most of us can take a considered view of most things, and make our own minds up.
Posted by Ken Harding, 26 Aug 2009