23 Jul 2010
The US Senate has abandoned plans to include a carbon cap and a base level for renewable energy generation in the energy bill brought by Democrat senators Joe Lieberman and John Kerry.
Renewable energy groups are up in arms about the failure of these key measures. The development is also seen as a political blow to President Barak Obama.
"A bipartisan bill with a national renewable electricity standard (RES) passed the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee over a year ago. It is beyond comprehension that we are now hearing that the bill may never be brought to the Senate floor,” said Denise Bode, chief executive of the American Wind Energy Association.
“A refusal to pass an RES is an attack on every American worker and consumer,” she added. “Not passing an RES endangers at least 360,000 jobs: 85,000 currently employed in the wind industry and the potential 274,000 additional jobs created by an RES. Workers, families and our country demand a new energy future. That future must emphasize new strategies that embrace clean, renewable sources of energy that reduce costs, create jobs and enhance our national security.”
No Republican senators have backed the bill which they label as an energy tax. The bill requires a 60 per cent majority to pass. The Democrats hold 57 of the 100-seat chamber and can count on two independents. Some Democrat senators have wavered in their support and two in coal-producing Virginia are in open opposition.
Even an effort to reduce the application of the law to electricity utilities only has failed to win further support.
Publicly Lieberman and Kerry remain confident that carbon cap-and-trade legislation will be passed eventually. The bill may be reintroduced in September, after the Senate's August recess, but it is unlikely that Lieberman and Kerry can garner additional support.
The Democrats are expected to lose seats in elections due in November.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT LEGISLATION
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Solar sector warns proposed cuts to feed-in tariffs would make it impossible for them to deliver promised rates of return
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
What and who is "pro business", really?
I believe there's a severe misunderstanding in this country as to what constitutes a "pro business" stance. The way I see it, a public servant is either "pro-business" or "pro-the-business-that-pays-me-the-most-money-or-threatens-me-with-the-most-political-harm". We have far too many of the latter. A genuine proponent of the broader business climate would seek the a legislative result that leads to the success of the most sustainable long-term business models over those short-term models that are neither sustainable nor healthy for the society or the biosphere upon which all life (and therefore all business) is ultimately dependent. For that matter, a genuinely "pro business" strategy would also seriously consider lifting the burden of healthcare from businesses and spreading the cost equitably across the entire population including strong incentives to engage in healthy and preventative behaviors? but that?s another discussion. What we have instead is a situation where money is now increasingly regarded as synonymous with Free Speech - this means that the entrenched businesses with the biggest treasuries get to scream into bullhorns, and innovative entrepreneurs and regular citizens get to whisper through pillows. Here's a little more on the current shape of things in our capital-flooded capitol and statehouses: http://2greenenergy.com/say-adios-to-campaign-finance-reform/2426/ By way of comparison, check out this Forbes article on what it judges to be the happiest countries on earth: http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/14/world-happiest-countries-lifestyle-realestate-gallup.html Then to dog in a little examine each nation on Wikipedia, with particular attention to sections on the environment, government and politics, economy, and education, beginning with #1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark I think you'll find that the priorities are a little different in the power structures of these nations, and there are some valuable lessons to take away from each of them. I love my country and I think America has the greatest potential of any nation on the planet - and I also think she yet has some significant distance to cover to realize that potential. Craig Shields, Editor, 2GreenEnergy.com, and author, Renewable Energy - Facts and Fantasies (2010)
Posted by Craig Shields, 25 Jul 2010
What's the worst that can happen
Every single president in this country since Richard Milhous Nixon has publically recognized the need to break our addiction to foreign oil. With only about a twentieth of the global population, our highly carbon intensive society uses about a fifth of the world's petroleum. Of the top 16 nations combined oil reserves (about 80% of the complete total) we have a mere 2.33% - there's no way we're drilling ourselves out of this addiction problem domestically. The way I see it, peak oil isn't the barrier we'll hit first - with China's and India's 2.45 billion people getting thirstier and thirstier for this black gold, the grains of sand in the hourglass between this moment and a crises between maximum extraction rate and soaring demand are likely to be astonishingly few. So, renewable energy isn't just a tree-hugger's goal - it should also be a national security hawk's goal. Here's a little more discussion of the coming oil scarcity challenges: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2010/04/peak-oil-whats-the-big-deal As far as carbon is concerned, here's an excellent summation of the choices before us and their potential impact: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zORv8wwiadQ It strikes me that the power structures in this fine nation of ours are far too tightly bound to existing infrastructure, and those bonds are largely financial in nature - the weight of cash and convenience counters the weight of wisdom and prudence far too often. Craig Shields, Editor, 2GreenEnergy.com, and author, Renewable Energy - Facts and Fantasies (2010)
Posted by Craig Shields, 25 Jul 2010