25 Sep 2008
Former US vice president and environmental campaigner Al Gore has claimed that it might be time for young people to take direct action against new coal- fired power stations through acts of civil disobedience.
According to Reuters, Gore made the statement at a meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City and called on action to be taken to stop the construction of coal power stations that do not store carbon.
"If you're a young person looking at the future of this planet and looking at what is being done right now – and not done – I believe we have reached the stage where it is time for civil disobedience to prevent the construction of new coal plants that do not have carbon capture and sequestration," Reuters reported him as saying.
Gore's statement echoes similar claims from MPs in the UK recently. Speaking at the party's conference earlier this month, Liberal Democrat MEP Chris Davis, spokesman for environment and public health, claimed that all politicians should be prepared to take direct action for issues they believe in.
"If we are on the losing side of something we feel passionate about, and we are prepared to take the risk and consequences of a judgment against us then I don't have a problem taking part in an act of non-violent direct action," he said. "If Gordon Brown decides to go ahead with Kingsnorth without carbon capture storage systems, then I will sit down in front of the bulldozers with other protestors and take what comes to me."
Davies made the comments in response to claims made by former director of Friends of the Earth, Jonathon Porritt, that the decision this month to acquit protestors at the Kingsnorth power plant in Kent was a sign that power companies could find themselves eventually viewed in the same way as tobacco companies for damaging public health.
Six Greenpeace activists were charged with causing £30,000 of damage at Kingsnorth last October. But earlier this month the six were acquitted of criminal damage with the jury agreeing by a 10-2 majority that "emergency action " could be used to stop damage to the environment.
Davies is reportedly taking the lead on the development of carbon capture and storage technology in the European Parliament, and is set to meet with the Environment Committee to vote on an amendment which, if successful, he claimed "will save HM Treasury hundreds of millions of pounds necessary to support carbon sequestration projects".
According to a statement from the Liberal Democrats, governments across Europe pledged to support construction of 12 commercial CCS demonstration plants by 2015, but none have yet been named to date.
The UK government is currently seeking bids for a first project but is limiting its promise of financial support to one of 300MW generating capacity, far less than that planned at Kingsnorth, the party claims.
According to figures from the International Energy Agency, worldwide use of the fossil fuel will increase by 70 per cent over the next 20 years.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The best green companies in the UK should be preparing their entries for annual BusinessGreen Leaders Awards
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
direct action against dirty coal plants
Who better than a former US vice president and Nobel Peace Prize winner to chain himself to the railings of a coal fired power station? This would get more publicity than almost any number of young activists. I look forward to seeing Chris Davis, Liberal Democrat MEP, take similar action. Pretty much all the IPCC worse case scenarios are being exceeded and we need drastic action now, no more delaying tactics. If we don't get rid of coal plants, we're completely shafted. Also, there needs to be a fresh look at better designs of nukes. The Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) project is a nuclear power plant design invented in the US 24 years ago but cancelled by Clinton and suppressed since. It has none of the drawbacks of conventional nuclear plants. Advantages include: * It can be fueled entirely with material recovered from today's used nuclear fuel. * It consumes virtually all the long-lived radioactive isotopes that worry people who are concerned about the "nuclear waste problem," reducing the needed isolation time to less than 500 years. * It could provide all the energy needed for centuries, feeding only on the uranium that has already been mined. * It uses uranium resources with 100 times the efficiency of today's reactors. * It does not require enrichment of uranium. * It has less proliferation potential than the reprocessing method now used in several countries. * And, of course, it emits no greenhouse gases. Greenpeace and FOE need to get up to speed on these things rather than performing knee jerks on hearing the word nukes.
Posted by tonyw, 26 Sep 2008