11 Aug 2009
The latest round of UN climate change talks kicked off in Bonn, Germany today, as UN officials voiced growing pessimism that the negotiations to agree a successor to the Kyoto Treaty at a meeting in Copenhagen later this year are falling dangerously behind schedule.
Speaking at the opening of the five days of informal talks, the UN's top climate official Yvo de Boer told BBC News he was increasingly worried that with many of the major emitters remaining at loggerheads the negotiating process was not moving fast enough.
"We have a 200-plus-page text riddled with square brackets [where issues are unresolved]," he said. "And it worries me to think how on earth we're going to whittle that down to meaningful language with just five weeks of negotiating time left."
There are now 117 days until the start of the Copenhagen conference in December where a successor to Kyoto is expected to be agreed. The latest round of talks involving more than 1,000 delegates from about 180 nations are to focus entirely on the development of a draft text for negotiation at the Copenhagen talks.
But de Boer warned that talks surrounding many of the key issues such as emissions targets and financing for clean technologies in the developing world remain deadlocked. "You're looking at hugely divergent interests, very little time remaining, a complicated document on the table and still a lot of progress to be made on some very important issues such as finance," he told the BBC, adopting a more pessimistic tone than at previous meetings.
His comments came as negotiators from China, India and other developing nations again reiterated that they would not sign up to emission targets unless developed nations agree to cut emissions 40 per cent by 2020 based on 1990 levels and increase the sums on offer to accelerate the rollout of low-carbon technologies in the developing world.
These demands appear increasingly unlikely to be met, with the EU committing to cuts of no more than 30 per cent by 2020, and then only if other developed nations agree to similar targets, and the US climate change bill featuring emission targets that require just a four per cent cut in emissions on 1990 levels by 2020. Moreover, US negotiators said they will not sign up to any deal unless all large emitters, including China and India, are on board.
However, Ambassador Chandrashekhar Dasgupta, the senior Indian negotiator, told the BBC that the country did not accept that it qualified as a large emitter given its low emissions per capita. "[India] is a country where half the rural population does not have a light bulb in its home, or a gas ring," he said. "So to describe this country as a large emitter is absurd – there's no other word for it."
In related news, former UK deputy prime minister John Prescott, who was involved in the negotiation of the original Kyoto deal, warned that the Copenhagen talks would collapse unless rich nations shift their position and show greater support for targets based on per capita emissions.
"For a deal to work, it has to have a formula that has an element of equity and social justice in it that reflects the state of each country's industrial development and its emissions per capita," he told the Guardian.
He also said that the West would have to provide much of the funding required to decarbonise developing economies. "The West is going to come up with big money on how to finance alternative energy in the developing countries, including clean coal," he said. "China and India are going to want to know how many billions the rich countries are going to put aside to help them make their carbon contributions. That will be one of the big tests at Copenhagen. The fact is that the West has poisoned the world and left continents such as Africa in poverty. The West will have up to stump up the cash for clean technology."
His comments come as UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon warned yesterday that the world was risking catastrophe if it failed to deliver a robust deal in Copenhagen.
"If we fail to act, climate change will intensify droughts, floods and other natural disasters," he said at an environmental forum near Seoul, South Korea. "Water shortages will affect hundreds of millions of people. Malnutrition will engulf large parts of the developing world. Tensions will worsen. Social unrest – even violence – could follow."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT LEGISLATION
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
10,000 mirrors to be installed at SolarReserve's 110MW Crescent Dunes project before the end of 2013
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
At last, someone comes up with the "right" asenwr!
At last, someone comes up with the "right" asenwr!
Posted by Kameryn, 27 May 2011
What an embarrassment
Wow, what an embarrassment. I mean Global Warming is a complete and total hoax, yet somehow the goverments of the world have gotten enough people to buy it that they have the greenlight to push their power grabs, market manipulations and usurping of freedoms. And yet they are failing miserably. Against all logic and reason (literally) the governments of the world have had the green carpet rolled out for them and somehow have STILL FAILED. Domestic Climate legislation is failing worldwide, and now, even with all forces united, a global treaty is nowhere near completion, mostly because all parties involved want to take without giving. I used to vehemently oppose any such efforts since, lets face it, Global Warming is a complete ant total hoax and not even a good one. However I should have known the best defense against it would be to put all the ignorants and criminals who believe in it in a room and challenge them with making a decision. Talk about the best roadblock you could ever throw at this issue. I mean its clear to anyone with an IQ ofer 69 that Kyoto actually had negative success, failing to make any significant reduction to greenhouse gases, while the much maligned, non-signing US, ultimately reduced emissions more than any of the signing countries. There will be no global pact. There will be no Copenhagen deal. Just more of the same loud talk/failed action, junkscience and disinformation campaigns that have made this issue the bad joke that it has been for decades. Instead the Greens will continue to be green with envy over the success of capitalism in light of another failed attempt at socialist takeover. Hahahahahahaha!
Posted by Derek D, 13 Aug 2009