08 Feb 2010
The melting of ice in the Arctic could result in economic costs of between $2.4 trillion (£1.54tn) and $24 trillion by 2050, according to a major new study that predicts that the loss of "the planet's air conditioner" will accelerate the rate of global warming and lead to an increase in losses associated with heat waves, rising sea levels and other climate change effects.
The study, which was commissioned by the Pew Environment Group, was presented to G7 finance ministers gathering for a two-day meeting on Canada's Baffin Island late last week.
Reviewed by more than a dozen scientists and economists, the study found that average temperatures are rising faster in the Arctic than in any other region. It warned that the resulting loss of Arctic sea ice and the melting of frozen permafrost had the potential to accelerate global warming by reducing the amount of heat reflected by the ice and increasing emissions of methane.
Researchers then calculated how these warming effects equated to carbon emissions and used methodologies for assessing the social cost of carbon to work out the likely economic impact of climate change in the Arctic.
"Putting a dollar figure on the Arctic's climate services allows us to better understand both the region's immense importance and the enormous price we will pay if the ice is lost," said Dr Eban Goodstein, co-author of the report and an economist who directs the Bard Center for Environmental Policy at Bard College in New York. "At the mid-range of our estimates, the cumulative cost of the melting Arctic in the next 40 years is equivalent to the annual gross domestic products of Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom combined."
The report calculates that this year alone, the warming effects of Arctic melting could have an impact equivalent to emitting three billion metric tons of CO2. "That's equal to 40 per cent of all US industrial emissions this year or bringing on line more than 500 large coal-burning power plants," said Dr Eugenie Euskirchen, co-author of the report and a scientist from the University of Alaska at Fairbanks’ Institute of Arctic Biology.
Scott Highleyman, international Arctic director for the Pew Environment Group, called on G7 finance ministers to commission a full economic analysis of the "global climate services" provided by the Arctic.
The report comes as climate scientists continue to face the fallout from the so-called Climategate affair, with a new survey by the BBC showing that the number of people who accept that temperatures are rising primarily as a result of human activity has fallen since emails from the University of East Anglia purportedly showing scientists attempting to resist freedom of information requests were stolen.
The survey of 1,000 people found that a quarter did not believe in global warming - a rise of eight per cent since a similar poll last year. Meanwhile, a third of those who did accept that temperatures are rising felt the pace and scale of climate change was being exaggerated.
Yet despite an unseasonably cold winter in Europe and the US, scientists have found that climate change is impacting the Arctic faster than expected, with a separate study involving more than 370 scientists from 27 countries showing on Friday that sea ice is retreating at a more rapid rate than previous models had predicted.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Ernst & Young report urges electric vehicle manufacturers to tap into power of "cool" to increase sales
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
I hope you're right!
I hope you're right because my Florida garden looks very bad right now because of the severe cold damage it's sustained over the last two winters. A lot of Floridians are questioning the types of plants/palms to be planting now because the climate seems to be COOLING. Why continue to plant tender palms when strong, arctic fronts continue to plow through the "tropical" state?
Posted by Troy, 08 Feb 2010
Bring it home
Gentlemen One Country has ever Lived with it's industry moved off shore. Bring it back! America is strong only if me make what we need! Sincerely Peter B Hickey
Posted by Peter B. Hickey, 09 Feb 2010
Artic Remediation
I would like to share our interest as one of the principals of Royal Wind we have designed an Ocean Temperature Regulatory System using our revolutionary turbines to power cold water pumps. Our system is designed to pump large amounts of cold water to the surface of the ocean to create cold water thermoclines. We believe that widespread use of our system worldwide would result in a much desired global temperature regulation and reduction. The health of our oceans and the increased carbon sequestration are linked to global sustainability. We feel that without intervention the oceans are in danger of collapse. The health of our oceans is crucial to the maintenance of oxygen levels in the atmosphere. If the oceans die, we will struggle to survive. It?s all connected: ocean health, carbon sequestration, and global temperatures. Here?s the plan: To install our ocean-current powered cold water pumps in strategic locations worldwide, creating cold water thermoclines, increasing the sequestration of anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Our system will also be used to build the polar icecap back to a more acceptable year-round base level which will also ensure the continued function of the thermohaline and of the North Atlantic drift. Our system will also be used to create cold water barriers to hurricanes. We can solve the Earth's problems with the right effort. We must if we plan to continue living on this Earth.
Posted by Laura Bailey, 16 Feb 2010