06 Jan 2010
The US government is edging towards a final decision on the controversial Cape Wind offshore wind project following a landmark ruling by a federal agency that could render the proposed site unusable.
The Department of the Interior has said it is aiming to reach a resolution over the future of the development by 1 March. The announcement came as the chances of the project getting the go-ahead this week received a further blow when the National Park Service's (NPS) Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places found that the proposed site is eligible to be listed in the National Register of Historic Places.
Cape Wind, slated for development in Nantucket Sound, has been under consideration since 2001. It was originally scheduled to receive a planning decision in mid-2008, and to be up and running by the end of this year.
However, the project, which would represent the first US offshore wind farm, has faced significant opposition from Cape Cod residents, including recently deceased senator Edward Kennedy, who fear that it will damage the beauty of the surrounding coastline.
The project was officially approved by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) last January, but two federally recognised Native American tribes - the Mashpee Wampanoag and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gayhead (Aquinnah) - challenged the decision, arguing that it would impinge upon an historically significant area.
The NPS began a review of the historical status of the site at the request of the Minerals Management Service in November, after the MMS found itself at odds with the native tribes over the proposed site.
However, while the NPS decision that the site is eligible to qualify as a place of historic interest found in the tribes' favour, it is not a binding ruling.
"The keeper is responsible for making this determination of eligibility; however, final decisions with respect to project implementation rest solely with the Federal agency funding, licensing or assisting the project, which in this case is MMS," the ruling stated.
The decision adds to a tough week for US wind projects in general.
The Bureau of Land Management also unveiled guidelines on Monday to protect the threatened sage grouse bird, which could have a major impact on future wind farm developments in the state of Wyoming.
The office of state governor Dave Freudenthal said the guidelines functionally exclude wind projects in 20 per cent of Wyoming. Talking to Reuters, an assistant to the governor said that the guidelines require that the state prevent any net loss in the sage grouse population.
In other news, AMSC Windtec, the wind energy subsidiary of engineering giant American Superconductor, has announced plans to jointly develop a giant 5MW wind turbine with China's third-largest wind turbine manufacturer, Dongfang Steam Turbine Works.
The turbines will hit the market in 2012, following on from a 2.5MW turbine also being developed by the two companies, which ships this year.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT LEGISLATION
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Solar sector warns proposed cuts to feed-in tariffs would make it impossible for them to deliver promised rates of return
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
bad news
Another setback for Cape Wind project, which would utilize only 24 square miles of Nantucket to provide more than 420MW of clean, green power. The NPS ruling will slow a potentially revolutionary project for alternative energy production. If you?re interested in wind energy, check out http://www.greencollareconomy.com. It has hundreds of case studies on emerging green technology and wind farms. It's also the largest b2b green directory on the web.
Posted by Casey Verdant, 07 Jan 2010
SAVE NANTUCKET SOUND, CAPE WIND PROJECT MUST BE RELOCATED FAR OFF-SHORE
As a colonial-rooted Cape Cod native who firmly believes in the sanctity of our maritime heritage, I am writing to ardently express my steadfast support for the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound. Based upon sensible logic, data and reasoning, I am also conversely opposed to the controversial Cape Wind Project which seeks to despoil and rob us of the pristine nautical legacy bestowed by our orefathers. As a result of the likely profound damaging regional financial, ecological and public safety consequences Cape Wind would wrought upon us all, it should not be allowed to proceed forward to fruition. The project poses a cogent danger to essential air and sea navigation. Siting the project in Nantucket Sound is a breach of the public trust. Contrary to their sham claims, the cost of the electricity which the project will produce would not be cheap or competitive. It would be an unbearable fiscal burden hoisted upon us without our sanction or consent. Furthermore, it will represent a deleterious local economic blow by it's absconding of undeserved taxpayer-funded subsidies, forced real estate devaluations, and lost revenues from commercial and tourism activities. The proposed one hundred thirty wind turbines will perpetually cause unsightly visual contamination and istressing noise pollution. Finally, Cape Wind will unnecessarily endanger a critical marine and wildlifehabitat. Off-shore deep water wind has surfaced as a cost-effective and technologically feasible option in lieu of the Nantucket Sound situated Cape Wind Project. Cape Wind has chosen a location which possesses countless expenses as well as hazards to public safety, the marine environment, and the local economy. Deeper-water sites offer more powerful winds and the advantages of clean renewable energy without surrendering the irreplaceable natural beauty of Nantucket Sound. More distantly sited off-shore locations guarantee the advantages of clean wind power without many of the harmful effects of close-shore siting. Furthermore, there would be little harmful impact upon air and marine navigational safety and local tourist-based conomies. In 2007, the U.S. Department of Energy?s National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) estimated a total off-shore wind energy resource of over 1000 GW. The potential for deep water locations greater than 30 m (or 100 feet) is enormous. Approximately ninety percent of the off-shore wind potential in the United States resides in deep water. With the aforesaid thoughtful rationales in mind, along with the inherently unfair and inequitable nature of the proposed Cape Wind Project itself, it must not become a reality which will forever doom our children and grandchildren to a ghastly socially inhumane legacy. Ron Beaty West Barnstable, MA
Posted by RON BEATY, 06 Jan 2010