20 Jan 2009
Tensions are rising between environmental groups and California's Governor Schwarzenegger as he seeks to rein in environmental protection measures in an attempt to kickstart the economy.
Schwarzenegger has built himself a reputation as a world leader on tackling climate change and has imposed some of the most stringent green regulations anywhere in the US since he took office.
However, his state's budget crisis is now so severe that some reports claim the government will run out of money next month - a scenario that prompted Schwarzenegger to write to President-Elect Obama earlier this month, asking him to "Waive or greatly streamline National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) requirements consistent with our statutory proposals to modify the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) for transportation projects".
CEQA demands that an environmental review is undertaken before any project requiring Government approval can go ahead.
The move was seized upon by green groups as evidence that the Governor was seeking to roll back important environmental protections in an attempt to accelerate state capital investment projects
"All Californians care about the fiscal health of our state, but relaxing environmental law is not the way to do it," responded Ann Notthoff, California advocacy director at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "California's dedication to our workforce and investment in developing clean energy technology has built our economy into the eighth largest economy in the world. These are tough times, but it's times like these that we need to work toward what's best for California."
Speaking at press conference this week, Schwarzenegger said that the relaxation of the environmental rules was needed to helkp tackle rising unemployment. "It’s about jobs, jobs, jobs," he said. "That's why I've been adamant about easing environmental regulations and other red tape in order to get the infrastructure going, to get infrastructure projects moving as quickly as possible."
The Governor, currently locked in a stalemate with his legislature over his proposed budget, urged Democrat legislators to compromise and approve the budget despite the push to water down environmental rules.
The request for Obama to waive the National Environmental Protection Act is not the first instance of Schwarzenegger seeking to streamline planning rules to water down environmental inspections. At the end of September, he signed bill SB 375, introducing rules to help plan suburban communities that produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions, but also exempting home construction projects from the California Environmental Quality Act.
Schwarzenegger has traditionally been an ally of environmental groups, but his complaints about the economic effect of delays to infrastructural projects have been mounting recently.
Up to 2,000 infrastructure projects are currently in danger of failing, he said, adding that the ability to rely on the government bonds market for extra capital is partly to blame for the financial mess. "The board that controls the state bank account has now pulled the plug on $3.8 billion of infrastructure loans; that means that thousands of infrastructure projects will be cancelled and that will have a devastating effect," he said in December.
California's unemployment rate was at 8.4 per cent in November, and is estimated to reach nine per cent.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT LEGISLATION
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Model X sports Back to the Future-style "falcon doors" and is set to go on sale in 2014
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Finally
About time, Arnold. Way to wait until the last minute before pulling you head out of your arse.
Posted by Balsac T. Bagher, 23 Jan 2009
Obama's Problem Too
So let's step back a little, and look at what is happening here: Arnold wants to create jobs and stimulate the economy through infrastructure and public works projects. However the Environmental Groups he panders to now look to block that from happening because they weren't offered their standard kickback, or the opportunity to submarine these projects completely. Funny that this should happen 2 days after the inauguration of our new exhalted leader who has promised: 1. To stimulate the economy and create jobs through public works projects 2. To expand government pandering to environmental groups and issues. So California is providing a sneak preview of the same issues the entire country is likely going to be facing very soon. As such it will be very interesting to see how Obama responds. Failing to help California would seemingly indicate that he never believed his own campaign promises, and will lock the country in the same EXPENSIVE quandry. However, helping California, would be an effective pre-emptive strike against enviro-groups who threaten his credibility in keeping some of his bigger campaign promises. This could provide him a lot of political capital, as most Americans care more about having a job and food, than they do about quacko enviro-agendas. Your move BHO. Make it a good one.
Posted by Derek D, 22 Jan 2009
hit the road quack
the governor has decided to fast track the development of several highway projects, despite their dubious environmental consequences. http://tinyurl.com/7abh5m
Posted by ty, 22 Jan 2009
Hoist on your own petard, eh? LOL
LOL Arnold you get what you deserve. Global warming is a LIE and you push the lie for poltiical expediency. You should know better.
Posted by disgruntled, 22 Jan 2009
How dare you Arnold!
Putting jobs before the environment? California should continue to set an example for the rest of the nation by doing the following: - Banning any new development on undeveloped land. - A plan to restore 10% of all currently developed land back to its original, undeveloped state. - A requirement that all electricity used in the state come from renewable resources by the end of 2009. - A complete ban on the internal combustion engine by the end of 2009. - A ban on the sale and consumption of meat by the end of 2009. Sure this will destroy California's economy, but it will be good for the environment, so it's worth it, right?
Posted by David, 21 Jan 2009