22 Aug 2008
The government was yesterday accused of failing in its duty to enforce its own eWaste regulations in the wake of fresh reports that large quantities of broken IT equipment are continuing to be dumped illegally in Africa.
More than a year after the introduction of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) directive, experts claim the legislation "lacks teeth" and its enforcement body, the Environment Agency, is badly under funded. These are accusations the Agency has only partially denied.
Under WEEE, IT manufacturers are legally responsible for the safe disposal of their products, and are obliged to ensure all products are disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner themselves or sign up with a government-approved waste-handling firm.
However, a recent investigation from Greenpeace International has revealed that large quantities of broken computers, monitors and TVs from brands including Philips, Canon, Dell Microsoft, Nokia, Siemens and Sony are being illegally shipped to Africa and are continuing to end up in scrap yards in Ghana.
The broken machines are then stripped, crushed and burned by workers, many of whom are children, to remove the valuable components and metals. A process that not only pollutes local water tables, but also exposes workers to potentially toxic dust and fumes, said the Greenpeace report.
Critics claim that the shipment of the broken goods is clearly illegal, but the Environment Agency is shying away from its enforcement role and lacks the resources to adequately police the new rules.
Martin Hojsik, Greenpeace International toxics campaigner and the man behind a lot of the research, said he had found equipment from the NHS, local councils, schools and universities in the dumps.
A spokesman for the Department of Health said it was not directly accountable for the equipment found in Ghana, arguing it was the responsibility of local health trusts to ensure they are WEEE-compliant. However, the uncovering of public sector machines in African scrap yards proves that the rules are being flouted at some point in the waste stream.
A spokesman for the Environment Agency acknowledged that there were funding issues, adding that the complexity of the legislation had made the policing of the legislation difficult.
Tony Roberts, founder and director of development at Computer Aid International, said the agency is too low on resources to adequately enforce WEEE. "The Environment Agency has no staff to oversee those who knowingly flout the WEEE directive, he observed.
Roberts has had lots of experience working the agency in his role at Computer Aid, a charity that distributes refurbished computers for reuse in developing countries. He added, "The problem with the WEEE legislation is it has no teeth".
Critics claim the situation is likely to worsen in the wake of Defra budget cuts earlier this year that saw the Environment Agency slash funding for waste management programmes by 38 per cent – a move that was criticised earlier this week in a House of Lords report that urged the government to reverse budget cuts to green business support agencies.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT WASTE
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The ignominy heaped on Fred Goodwin will be nothing compared to that carbon intensive firms risk facing
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
WEEE Directive - Asset management is key to compliance
It seems that the main reason for organisations not meeting their electronic waste regulations is the cost of complying, resulting in them looking for the easy way out and using African countries such as Ghana as a dumping site. However, unless organisations get their asset registers in order and fulfil the WEEE directive, they will incur significant costs in the long run. Such policies as WEEE assume a level of asset management far beyond that achieved by the majority of UK business. Unless supplying a like for like replacement, suppliers will only remove and dispose of equipment they have delivered initially. How many UK businesses can accurately identify the location of their WEEE equipment within the organisation and confirm when it was purchased and from whom? Without such information, just which company do they expect to handle the free disposal? Organisations need to implement sound asset disposal procedures. Linking the asset register to a document management system will ensure a scanned WEEE certificate is linked to a disposed asset, providing the required audit trail. Each asset can be recorded alongside the supplier?s name and email address, enabling swift supplier contact when disposal is due. UK business is already complaining about excessive red tape, perhaps why the WEEE Directive introduction in July 2007 was so downplayed. But a belief that the onus of WEEE is firmly on equipment suppliers could be an expensive mistake. Karen Conneely Group Commercial Manager Real Asset Management www.realassetmgt.co.uk
Posted by Karen Conneely, 26 Aug 2008