11 Feb 2010
An influential group of peers yesterday called on politicians, businesses and the media to take a more dispassionate stance on the so-called "climategate" controversy, warning that exaggerated concerns over the accuracy of climate science were in danger of delaying action to address climate change risks.
Writing in a letter published in the Daily Telegraph, the group of 15 Lords urged “the media, the public, policy makers and the scientific community to calm their nerves and take a proportionate look at the evidence as a whole".
It added that "the overwhelming body of peer-reviewed scientific evidence shows… climate change is happening and is very likely to be caused by human activity".
The group includes some of the UK's most influential climate policy experts, such as Lord Stern, head of the Climate Change Committee Lord Turner, chairman of the Environment Agency Lord Smith, former BP chief executive Lord Browne, and CBI boss Richard Lambert.
The letter argues that policy makers and business leaders must accept that climate science is inherently uncertain and as a result should be assessed based on the balance of risk attached to scientists' predictions.
"Yes, there is uncertainty in the science, and there probably always will be, " it says. "But the uncertainties are not primarily about whether or not climate change is happening, but about how fast change will come and how bad it will be. The challenge is one of the management of risk, and none of the evidence implies that we can be confident that the risks are small. On the contrary, taken together, the evidence strongly suggests that the risks are major and delay in action is dangerous."
It accepts that political and business leaders should not “gloss over" the inaccuracies and breaches of protocol that have emerged at the IPCC and the University of East Anglia respectively, but urges them to "maintain our resolve to focus on the real issues".
"What matters is how we get global emissions to peak and start to decline in not much more than a decade; reduce UK greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80 per cent by 2050; how we shift to a low carbon economy; how we will adapt our communities and infrastructure to more extreme events, such as flooding, drought and sea level rise; and how we will change behaviours and values so that we can all live in a cleaner, more sustainable world," the letter states.
The letter comes as Republicans this week launched a co-ordinated attack on both climate science and the US administration's attempts to pass climate change legislation based largely on the fact that the East Coast of America is currently enduring an unseasonable cold snap.
The family of renowned climate sceptic, Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, built an igloo on Capitol Hill with a sign reading "Al Gore's New Home", while the Senator himself emailed the New York Times stating that the cold weather reinforced doubts that global warming was "unequivocal".
Meanwhile, right wing bloggers and talk show hosts cited the cold weather as evidence climate change is not happening and the Virginia Republican Party launched an online ad titled "12 inches of global warming" and criticising two Democrat representatives for backing the proposed climate change bill.
The attacks were immediately condemned by climate scientists, who pointed out that there is a difference between climate and weather, and that an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events is entirely consistent with rising average global temperatures.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT POLITICS
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The best green companies in the UK should be preparing their entries for annual BusinessGreen Leaders Awards
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Media Pleading the 5th
The national media?s continued silence on ClimateGate and increasing revelations of outright fraud and wrongdoing at all levels of government, academia and the media itself, tells the truth of the tail. That truth is there's a lot more to this ClimateGate story than what little is being reported. The small (2 to 3 dozen) international cabal of climate scientists could not have possibly gotten to this point without extraordinary funding, political support at virtually all levels of government, especially at the national level and unparalleled cooperation from the national and world media. This wide-spread networked support continues even as we-the-people puzzle over what this is all about. I ask you, "What are you seeing and hearing from our national media on the subject?" Anything? What are you seeing and hearing from all levels of our government, local and regional newspapers and media outlets? Anything of substance? At all of these levels the chatter has remained remarkably quite on the subject, wouldn't you say? Why? What points and positions are you beginning to hear on the radio and see on the television? This cabal of scientists has an unprecedented level of support given the revelations contained in the emails, documented in the computer software code and elaborated in the associated programmer remarks (REM) within the code. And ---- this has gone on for years, AND continues even in the presence of the most damning evidence one could imagine, or even hope for. Watergate pales in comparison, given the trillions of dollars in carbon offset taxes, cap & trade fees hanging in the balance and the unimaginable political control over people?s lives this all implies. The mainstream media's conspiracy of silence proves the point. Their continued cover-up is as much a part of this crime as the actual scientific fraud. ABC, CBS and NBC are simply co-conspirators exercising their 5th Amendment rights.
Posted by John A. Jauregui, 12 Feb 2010
You have proved -nothing-
Not even skeptics deny that the climate is changing. You continue to cling to the notion that man's activities are to blame. This is the crux of the problem -- the science that predicts the future path of climate and blames man nearly 100% for a changing climate is completely tainted. They have falsified critical data. They have attempted to silence scientific dissent. They grossly exaggerated various highlighted "catastrophes" as science instead of political activism. These kinds of articles trumpeting that "some scientists were bad, but the science is good" are doing more harm than good to those who love mother earth. The only rational choice is to revisit all of the data and more importantly the computer models that attempt to predict the path of climate over the next few centuries. You may want to base the world economy on "science" that has been driven primarily by political expediency, I don't. I'm all for electrifying our automobiles, going to non-fossil energy and things that are inherently good for our environment. I'm not for this high-and-mighty liberal ego trip of telling the rest of us that "were all bad" because we use energy. Your cause just shot itself badly. Perhaps the next round we can get to real science. You want to see the world change, understand that your torch bearers have betrayed your trust. call them on it, then ask for the science to be done right this time. Right now the climate models are no better than the theory of "intelligent design."
Posted by Phil, 11 Feb 2010