27 Aug 2009
The latest Green Grades report card on paper policies gives FedEx Office and Office Depot high marks for avoiding paper from endangered and controversial sources while Amazon.com, Costco and others get F's.
The Green Grades report, now in its third year, is compiled by ForestEthics and the Dogwood Alliance, and is based on surveys sent to companies and separate research.
The report gives companies high marks if they avoid paper sourced from endangered forests, caribou habitat in the Canadian Boreal Forest, tree plantations in the southern US and companies with negative track records like International Paper and Asia Pulp & Paper.
The groups also give companies low marks if they use Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) certified sources. Although the SFI is one of several sustainable forestry certification programs in existence and has been endorsed by the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification, some do not see it as a positive program because it was founded by forest and paper industry companies and its standards differ from the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification.
The Green Grades report shows more of the companies surveyed rely on or are moving toward FSC sources.
Office retail companies received the highest overall marks. FedEx Office got an A-, Office Depot got a B, Staples got a B-, and OfficeMax received a C.
Each score is based on individual scores based on policies for chain of custody, endangered forests, plantations and controversial sources, responsible forestry and FSC certification, recycling and reduction and other leadership.
FedEx Office hits all the main points, even stocking FSC paper in most of its copy centres, but the report calls out its overall paper policy for not being detailed enough.
Wholesale companies and distributors received a mix of middle and low grades, with Unisource getting a C+, United Stationers receiving a C and Paperlinx/Spicers and Xpedx each getting an F.
But the general retail companies received the lowest overall grades. Target and Walmart/Sam's Club took D+'s, and Amazon.com and Costco got F's.
The companies with the lowest grades mostly either ignored the questionnaire sent out for the report or did not provide substantial information, but research showed they also lack decent paper policies or rely too heavily on paper from endangered or controversial sources.
This article first appeared at GreenBiz.com
LATEST STORIES ABOUT SUPPLY CHAIN
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Solar sector warns proposed cuts to feed-in tariffs would make it impossible for them to deliver promised rates of return
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
recycle
I was just shopping at Costco and they were selling paper towels from recycled paper which I thought was nice.
Posted by gfk, 27 Aug 2009
Giving companies failing ratings based on them not filling out a survey is poor journalism!
If the grades are based on participation of the survey, the survey is flawed. It invalidates itself because it lacks the sufficient data to properly grade a company. The companies with the lowest grades mostly either ignored the questionnaire sent out for the report or did not provide substantial information. So if they can fail the companies for not responding, This article should fail for lack of data and integrity.
Posted by Tim Cynical, 27 Aug 2009