Despite growing calls for the wider adoption of community scale biomass power plants, new research released yesterday suggests that the environmental benefits of smaller scale facilities may have been overstated.
The study from the Tyndall Centre for Climate Research at the University of Manchester assessed the environmental impact of 25 bioelectricity systems in the UK, analysing the full lifecycle impact through crop production, transport and energy generation.
It found that while all the plants studied delivered reductions in carbon emissions compared to grid electricity larger facilities delivered significantly lower levels of emissions per unit of electrical output than smaller scale community projects.
Community scale biomass plants powered by waste material, wood chips or sewage and capable of providing power to a small business or housing estate have been widely touted as a potentially viable source of clean energy. In a report released earlier this week, the Green Building Council argued that community scale renewable energy plants should form a key component of the government's plans to ensure all new homes are "zero carbon" by 2016.
Advocates of the approach argue that such facilities are particularly efficient as the waste biomass provided by the community only has to travel a short distance to the power plant.
However, the University of Manchester study concluded that the energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and environmental pollutants associated with haulage lorries visiting bio-electricity plants is relatively insignificant when compared to the efficiency gains attained by larger plants.
Presenting the research at the UK Energy Research Centre's Sustainable Energy UK conference in Oxford yesterday, report author Dr Patricia Thornley said that while biomass power plants represented a means of delivering substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions those investing in the technology had to remember that it still has an environmental impact.
"It is not emission free and, when account is taken of airborne emissions, ecological and other impacts there is arguably greater potential for direct environmental impact than is the case for most other renewable energy technologies," she said. "These factors make it particularly important to consider the whole system – including crop production and transport – and to choose an appropriate scale, technology and type of biofuel."
New enzyme promises to speed delivery of second-generation biofuels made from waste biomass 18 Oct 2007
Willow and Elephant Grass to provide power for 40,000 homes 19 Mar 2008Space and slurry leave farmers well positioned to exploit renewable energy revolution 21 May 2008
The UK government's chief scientific adviser has joined green lobby groups in asking for ethanol fuel targets to be reconsidered 25 Mar 2008
Intelligent Energy ramps up funding for R&D and partnerships 04 Jul 2008
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
More news
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
