The debate is over. Evidence abounds that companies can improve their bottom line by looking out for the other two thirds of their triple bottom line. So if sustainability makes so much sense, why isn't everyone doing it?
The hurdle is not the hard facts so much as the soft ones. Companies, like people, have personalities. Some are progressive, but most are conservative. When it comes to sustainability, the progressives get a lot of press, but in reality, they are the exceptions to the rule.
I'm no stranger to working in a conservative culture. Before launching a sustainability consulting practice, I was a management consultant with PricewaterhouseCoopers and IBM, working within industries such as oil and gas and accounting. As a sustainability consultant, my first clients included law firms, also conservative by nature. Ready to barrel down the green superhighway at top speed, I created green plans that would take them from zero to 60, only to find out they were more content to creep along in the slow lane.
The issue was not figuring out what to do. There are a number of well-documented third-party certification programmes that can deliver demonstrable value through cost-savings measures that reduce environmental impact and increase brand awareness. The real challenge in greening a conservative culture lies in bridging the chasm between "progressives" and " conservatives."
Conservatives are cautious; progressives throw caution to the wind. Conservatives are grounded in reality; progressives are planted in possibility. Although these are broad generalisations, in today's highly charged political environment, any issue, particularly a heated one such as energy, is subject to sweeping generalisations and half-truths.
So how do we chart a course for change within a conservative culture without being labeled as progressive – and potentially disregarded as a result? That question was on my mind when I met Dan Northcut.
Dan is the director of environmental studies at St Mark's School of Texas, a private preparatory school for boys founded in Dallas in 1906. Dan has been with the school for more than 20 years. In fact, if you count the six years he spent there as a student, you could say he's been there for nearly 30 years.
During that time Dan has seen a lot. He remembers the late seventies when conserving energy was considered patriotic. To do its part, the school removed every other bulb from the light fixtures in its hallways and classrooms. Then came the 1980s. The solar panels were removed from the White House and the zeal for energy conservation in America was on the wane. Nearly two decades of relatively cheap energy followed.
Fast forward to 2008. Conservation has once again become a hot topic in the national discourse, prompting companies to take a fresh look at conservation practices. But while the words "going green" roll off the tongue with ease, rolling out green initiatives that reduce greenhouse gases is not so simple. Many organisations today pay lip service to sustainability while only a few are making genuine investments to make facilities and operations more efficient.
So what sets St Mark's School of Texas apart? A proactive, comprehensive approach to the 21st century realities of energy insecurity and climate change, driven by broad support from stakeholder groups, a spirit of leadership among its students, and the personal commitment of people such as Dan Northcut, who also serves as the school's environmental director.
During the past two years, St Mark's has implemented a single-stream recycling programme and has switched its power source to a blend of 30 per cent renewable energy, setting a goal to increase that amount by 10 per cent each year. Dan's AP Environmental Science elective course is so popular that the school added a second section. An environmental component is also being integrated into the curriculum of the lower school, giving younger students exposure to sustainability concepts at an early age. Even the teachers' lounge reflects eco-consciousness, now that Styrofoam cups have been replaced with ceramic mugs bearing St Mark's special green branding.
The most significant reflection of St Mark's commitment is the Board of Trustees' approval of LEED certification for the two new buildings undergoing construction. This decision added just two per cent more to the construction cost. St Mark's will recover this within about 10 years – less if the cost of energy rises – with the added benefits of a healthier indoor environment.
The school's eco-improvements, which began two decades ago with Dan, now have the support of teachers, administration, students, parents, and the board. How one person helped drive change at St Mark's presents a plan that any change agent can follow in a conservative culture.
Although Dan has a longer history in his organisation than the typical employee in a company, longevity has less to do with his success than the vital qualities of personal commitment, a penchant for education, a collaborative approach, and sheer enthusiasm. The green programmes that gain traction, when compared with the ones that produce lacklustre results, are created through one person or team exhibiting these traits.
Let's take a closer look at these qualities in terms of Dan's experience:
Personal commitment – As the director of environmental studies, Dan demonstrates knowledge of ecology and conservation on a daily basis. He also demonstrates his commitment by living a green lifestyle. Nobody is suspicious of his motives.
Education – Conservatives don't want to be sold to, but they do want to be informed. What tends to hold people back, even CEOs, from jumping into new territory are concerns that they cannot quite articulate. People need to develop a comfort level with green ideas. For the headmaster, Dan created a "green print" plan, prioritising and budgeting every element of his strategy. Dan engages the students through his environmental science classes, the administration through practical modifications for a greener campus, the parents through newsletters, and the community through free events such as movie festivals featuring eco-oriented documentaries.
Collaboration – Dan is just one person. As with any organisation, there exists at St Mark's a number of spheres of influence: students, parents, administrators, and board members. By working with these groups to address their specific concerns or interests, Dan is not pushing an agenda but providing a service. He is garnering buy-in throughout the process by asking influential people to help support these programmes.
Enthusiasm - Dan has fun. He likes people and seeks to
understand them. Dan's persistence is tempered by his enthusiasm, so that even
when he urges people to make green changes, he does so without annoying them.
Enthusiasm is the antidote to burn-out for anyone steering a green initiative
inside a change-resistant culture.
Having the right people in place is half the battle. The other half involves
strategy. To drive progress in a conservative culture, you must demonstrate that
you have
top-level support. While a progressive culture will take grass roots efforts
seriously, a conservative culture is more likely to follow the direction of
top-level leadership. When the St Mark's Board of Trustees decided that building
its new facilities to LEED standards was the right thing to do, the school's
green programme finally got some teeth. Sustainability went from being "Dan's
project" to becoming a core value of the organisation.
Management-level and administrative support – A major stumbling block in organisations that fulfill the first prerequisite is failure to engage other rungs of employees. Engaging stakeholders requires a sincere statement backed by action on the part of the leader, as well as education and incentives to motivate staff that may be reticent to support "progressive" ideas.
Minimal risk – Any initiative perceived as a risk to the brand will not gain support.
A clear path – Conservative cultures are not innovative by nature. By sharing case studies of similar companies' sustainability initiatives, change agents can offer a concrete path to follow. Reputable third-party certifications such as Energy Star also offer a step-by-step plan as well as promotional materials and opportunities for recognition.
Bottom-line value – The numbers have to demonstrate a relatively short payback period with a clear ROI.
Political awareness – Know the culture. I had to learn this lesson the hard way. Sometimes you can have everything else in place and the plan will still fall flat. Never underestimate the importance of hierarchy in the planning stage. Know your audience. If you don't engage the right people early on, they will not appreciate the value of a sustainability plan that may require funds or behavioral changes, even if the numbers work on paper.
As specialised as the sustainability field is becoming, the gulf between where the experts are heading and where everyone else still remains continues to widen. In trying to solve complex problems, we create solutions that make sustainability ever more confusing for conservative cultures to embrace. Already they must wade through scores of certifications and requirements that can resemble regulations to the less informed. The result is stagnation, frustration, and inertia.
To get green off the ground within a change-resistant culture, try going back to basics. Even a programme as simple as the three Rs: reduce, re-use and recycle, can be effective. Companies that put into place a simple but measurable programme may see enough positive evidence to inspire more strategic actions down the road. Slow and steady wins the race.
Conservation is still a conservative value, so why the pushback from conservative cultures? The reality is that most companies, like people, don't make decisions according to their values as much as their circumstances, especially in uncertain times.
In this case, sustainability enthusiasts might dispense with idealism and try Dan's pragmatic approach, which he succinctly summarises in the words of Harry Truman: "It's amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit."
Anna Clark is president of EarthPeople, a consulting firm that helps companies of all sizes create and execute green strategies to reduce costs and bolster their brand.
This article first appeared at Greenbiz.com
Cameron presents pre-election energy policy, promising greater investment certainty for low-carbon projects, green loans for households, and streamlining of planning system 19 Mar 2010
Joint statement from carbon exchange and Hungarian government aims to restore confidence in CER market 19 Mar 2010
From climate change contrarians to the "KitKatastrophe" of Nestle's palm oil policy, we look at the best the green web has to offer this week 19 Mar 2010
From the government's plans for a marine energy revolution to John Lewis' proposals for an off-grid supermarket 19 Mar 2010






