The Volkswagen Polo BlueMotion represents VW’s attempt at squeezing better
fuel economy from its existing diesel-powered supermini. The changes are
relatively modest but create a noticeable improvement in miles per gallon.
The base model Polo BlueMotion 1 achieves 74.3mpg on the combined cycle and
an
official
CO2 figure of 99g/km. This allows it to slip into taxation Band A, the most
economical category available, earning it a zero-cost tax disc. Within this
category the Polo currently has no rivals other than short-range
battery-electric vehicles such as the Reva G-Wiz, but other Band A cars will no
doubt be offered by mainstream manufacturers in due course.
However, the BlueMotion 1 is a real no-frills vehicle. The addition of air
conditioning in the better equipped BlueMotion 2 variant
bumps
up CO2 output to 104g/km and the car into Band B, where road tax costs £35 a
year and there are many more rivals - from the likes of Audi and BMW as well as
most of the middle-market brands like Ford, Toyota, Renault and Vauxhall.
All cars that fall into Bands A or B are due to
gain
exemption from the London Congestion Charge from 27 October this year,
adding substantially to their financial appeal for motorists based in or near
the capital.
The BlueMotion’s CO2 emissions are about 13 per cent better than a
conventional 1.4 TDI Polo SE, which has
CO2
emissions of 119g/km. So, what has VW done to achieve these economy gains?
To improve aerodynamics, the car boasts a new, smoother front grille, deeper
bumpers and sills to better manage the flow of air under the car, plus a spoiler
hugging the tailgate. Special low-rolling-resistance tyres are fitted to
lightweight allow wheels that are slightly narrower than those of other Polos.
The other major changes are to the engine and gearbox. The three-cylinder
1.4-litre TDI turbo-diesel engine has a different turbocharger to alter the
power/economy balance, and the gearbox has longer ratios in third, fourth and
fifth, meaning that the engine spins more slowly than normal for a given road
speed.
These changes clearly have their benefits, but also have drawbacks. The
deeper bumpers reduce ground clearance, increasing the likelihood of damage from
kerbs. Tyre manufacturers have also stated that
low
rolling resistance compromises wet-weather grip, so to maintain safety it is
probably wise to replace tyres early - well before they reach the minimum legal
tread depth.
The modified gearbox can also be vexing, giving the car a split personality.
In first and second gears it feels lively and eager to accelerate. But in higher
gears it becomes distinctly slothful and reluctant to increase pace. At 50mph in
fifth, the engine is turning over at just 1500rpm. This combination of revs and
speed works only on the flat, however: the slightest incline requires shifting
down into fourth. Similarly, at motorway speeds, we found ourselves changing
down much more often than normal.
Urban driving was equally hard work: 30mph in fourth equates to about 1100rpm
– barely above idling speed – meaning lots of cog-swapping to avoid a labouring
engine when driving around town.
On the road we often found ourselves using one gear lower than normal,
defeating the point of the longer ratios. A six-speed box with conventional
gears would be a significant improvement, we feel.
The diesel engine is a far from refined beast too. The vibration and clatter
– very noticeable when cold and only a little more subdued when warm – leaves
no-one in any doubt as to the power source.
Despite these rough edges, the BlueMotion does achieve its aims. According to
the car’s trip-meter, it is very easy to achieve figures in the 60mpg to 70mpg
range, while even stop-start journeys among heavy inner-city congestion saw
40mpg on the meter. Unfortunately we did not have the Polo on test for long
enough to accurately verify these figures.
However, even if the BlueMotion can save emissions and so cut costs at the
pumps, it still faces big financial hurdles. The conventional 1.4 TDI Polo SE
model also sits in VED Band B and probably represents better value for money.
The Polo BlueMotion 1 has a base on-the-road price of £12,120 for the
three-door, including VAT. The equivalent BlueMotion 2 costs £12,935. The
comparable Polo SE, meanwhile, costs just £11,825 and is better equipped than
either BlueMotion model. At current prices, it would take about 150,000 miles
for the BlueMotion 2 to recoup its purchase premium over the SE through reduced
fuel usage, based on official consumption figures.
In summary, the BlueMotion is reasonably effective at what it does but seems
optimistically overpriced. We would suggest that interested buyers should
negotiate hard for a discount.
Still Not Green
None of the numbers add up! Okay, the car has low CO2 output - big deal. After driving it for 10 years, how much CO2 will one of these 'Greener Cars' have contributed to our environment? Well we need to start at its conception, development & manufacture, the transportation emmission of all it parts; the workforce, etc etc. It may have overall emmission lower than a standard Polo or any other car in its class - but is this what the consumer wants? For me the answer is a straight no. Why can't the big manufacturers build CO2 free products. That is products made from non-finite resources, using renewable energy, energy products made from renewable resources? If you want to gain the respect and attention of my generation - then thats the way to go.
Posted by Colin McLachlan, 05 Mar 2009