19 Jan 2012
The government has today set out how it will respond to the imminent court decision on when proposed cuts to feed-in tariff incentives can come into effect.
Following calls from the industry for the government to clarify the level of incentive available for current installations, Climate Change Minister Greg Barker this afternoon tabled a Written Ministerial Statement in parliament detailing the government's plans.
"We continue to stand by our original proposal," he said, referring to the plan to halve solar incentives for installations completed after December 12 last year. "However, I know that the uncertainty while we await the court's decision is difficult for the industry."
He added that to tackle this uncertainty and limit risks to the scheme's budget in the event that the government's appeal proves unsuccessful and the court orders a return to the previous feed-in tariff level of 43p/kWh, the government will lay draft licence modifications before parliament that would allow tariffs to be cut from April 1 for all installations completed on or after March 3.
The licence modifications confirm that from March 3 installations with less than 4kW of capacity will see incentives halved to 21p/kWh, while large installations with between 50kW and 250kW of capacity will see feed-in tariff payments cut to 12.9p/kWh. Mid-sized installations with 4-10kW will see tariffs cut from 37.8p to 16.8p/kWh, while installations with 10-50kW capacity will face a cut in the level of support from 32.9p to 15.2p/kWh.
The statement also reiterates the government's intention to stixk with its original proposals if it wins its appeal, imposing cuts to incentives for all installations completed after December 12 last year.
"If the court finds in favour of the government's appeal, we intend to stand by all our consultation proposals, including an earlier (December) reference date, subject to the Parliamentary procedure and consideration of consultation responses," Barker said.
"It is very important that we reserve this as an option because these 43p payments will take a disproportionate share of the budget available for small-scale low-carbon technologies. We want instead to maximise the number of installations that are possible within the available budget rather than use available subsidy to pay a higher tariff to a smaller number of installations."
In addition the statement indicates that the government might not meet its stated goal of delivering its response to the consultation and its wider proposals to reform the feed-in tariff scheme before the end of the month, suggesting that the documents may not be published until next month.
"The consultation closed on 23 December 2011 and over 2,000 consultation responses were received which we have been analysing carefully," Barker said. "We are intending to announce the outcome of the consultation by 9 February 2012, in time for any resulting legislative changes to come into effect from 1 April 2012. Our aim is that this announcement will be accompanied by a set of reform proposals for the next phase of the comprehensive review of the FITs scheme, which will be the subject of a further consultation."
He added that the government's latest intervention "gives the industry as much certainty as is possible" given the on-going legal action.
He also reiterated that ministers remain committed to reducing solar incentives "as quickly as possible, to protect consumer bills and to avoid bust in the whole Feed-in Tariff budget".
Friends of the Earth's executive director Andy Atkins welcomed the move, predicting the statement will "sort out some of the uncertainty that's crippling a thriving UK industry".
However, he reiterated calls for the government to rethink its approach to solar feed-in tariffs and raise the spending cap for the scheme.
"Solar payments should be cut in line with falling costs, but by trying to rush through payment before the consultation closed ministers created a shambolic mess that threatens 30,000 jobs and the future of the industry," he said. "Ministers must urgently use the millions of pounds in tax that solar firms generate to safeguard this industry and the jobs and businesses it has created."
His comments were echoed by Seb Berry, head of public affairs at Solarcentury, who urged the government to reconsider the spending cap for the feed-in tariff scheme.
"The Government is taking an important step today to restore some certainty to the PV market in the short-term, but it is no more than that," he said. "The elephant in the room for all FIT technologies, not just PV, remains the Government's decision to impose an unrealistic cap on the FIT scheme in 2010. Until that fundamental issue is addressed by the "greenest Government ever" what we have today is no more than a temporary albeit welcome step forwards."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT SOLAR
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Market has failed to provide sufficient new capacity to deal with increase in demand, energy minister warns
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
Service provider builds a compact, energy-efficient and scalable IT infrastructure
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Reality Cheque
While I think the Gvt handling of this has been appalling, I think the Solar industry needs to take a long hard look at itself and the economics of making itself work without subsidy. The whole thing has become about money and profits and FITS rather than the enviroment. I have seen first hand disgraceful practices (such as buying terrible panels from polluting countries/companies in China) so we in the West can be all goody-goody about geenrating a little green energy. I enjoy seeing all those who jumped on the FIT bandwagon for profit burn ... it probably will be, but I hope the government isn't overturned. Those on the inside (and know all about this) should be ashamed of yourselves.
Posted by Dude, 24 Jan 2012
Save Don't Generate
At present the Feed in Tariff doesn't encourage anyone to save electricity which is what we should really be aiming for. So how about reducing the Feed in tariff but increasing the Generation tariff? That way the people who are making a real energy contribution will be encouraged and rewarded, not the people who are making it but using it all themselves.
Posted by The Seaweeder, 22 Jan 2012
Is this an own goal?
So, DECC lays draft licence modifications before Parliament which, “subject to the Parliamentary process set out in the Energy Act 2008, makes provision for a reduced tariff rate (from 1 April 2012 onwards) for new solar PV installations with an eligibility date on or after 3 March 2012 under the Feed – in Tariffs scheme (FITs).” Is this not saying that the move to reduce FITs from Dec 11 was illegal? As the above states - “subject to the Parliamentary process set out in the Energy Act 2008" Under the act, the DECC was required to lay a draft licence modification before Parliament, not simply make an announcement! If simply making an announcement is sufficient, then - should they lose the current appeal, all they need to do is make another announcement the day after the appeal result. What this latest move is telling us, is that if they lose the appeal, then the modifications need to be laid before parliament before they can be implemented, not just make an announcement. If the result of the appeal is not known until the middle of Feb, the new rates cannot come into effect before the end of March (laid before parliament for 40 days). That would mean leaving the current 43.3 rate in force for another 4 weeks. It also begs the question - as the DECC are aware of this, then why are they bothering with the appeal?
Posted by Tony, 21 Jan 2012
Spin me another one
Analysing the consultation submissions thoroughly? Yeah right, their minds were made up long before the consultation even started, just like on the big schemes
Posted by Sundried Tomato, 20 Jan 2012
Yesterdays Announcement
This is my understanding of yesterday’s announcement, am i correct? If the government lose their appeal: 1. All installations up to 3rd March will receive 43.3p feed in tariff for 25 years. 2. Installations between 4th March and 31st March will receive 43.3p feed in tariff until 31st March, the feed in tariff will then reduce to 21p for the remainder of the 25 years. If the government win their appeal: 1. All installations after 12th December will receive a feed in tariff of 43.3p until 31st March and then will receive 21p feed in tariff for the remainder of the 25 years. 2. Installations after 31st March will receive 21p feed in tariff for 25 years. Your help to clarify would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards. Chris
Posted by Chris Whitehall, 20 Jan 2012
C Certificate is the real threat not cut in tariff !!
Again FOE and Solar industry are missing the real threat to the industry which is the proposal to make 86% of UK homes ineligible for even the reduced FIT, as they do not have C Certifcation. The hugely expensive and bureaucratic process proposed for non-C certificate houses, would mean almost no-one would go through it.
Posted by Donnachadh McCarthy, 20 Jan 2012
Continued uncertainty prevails
This move merely enables DECC to limit potential exposure at a return of 43.3p. There is now a finite time line, 3rd March and an unresolved ongoing legal battle...generally very bad for the consumer. The second, more material issue is the phase 2 review that places further uncertainty around post 31st March, again very bad for the consumer and the industry not withstanding.
Posted by Jamie O'Nians, 20 Jan 2012
Barker
Barker and Chris Huhne must resign.
Posted by Kev, 20 Jan 2012
Altereco , Bristol
Excellent tactics by DECC to cause massive confusion and minimise the amount installed up to March, Bad news for the solar industry and the green economy.
Posted by Reg Illingworth, 20 Jan 2012
Consultation?
This response from DECC shows the entire consultation process to be the complete sham that it is. DECC will do just what they want irrespective of the responses sent in.
Posted by Ted Marynicz, 19 Jan 2012
Grade C
Where does this leave the requirements for the EPC Grade C? Surely the real knife to the industry?
Posted by Jake, 19 Jan 2012
Buffoons
The title should have been - of course!
Posted by Heliotricity Solar, 19 Jan 2012
Buffons
Unqualified, misinformed politicians must stop this mantra that PV uses a disproportionate amount of the FIT ''budget'. In fact, solar PV uses a precisely proportionate amount due to its suitability (both in physical and legislative terms) for larger numbers of locations than other qualifying technologies. DECC's policies and their ridiculous justifications for them are farcical.
Posted by Heliotricity Solar, 19 Jan 2012
No Subsidy it all.
I don't see how the 12.9p rate for larger installs is a subsidy at all. If you were given market rate for what you produce, not 3.1p - you'd be about the same. Seems the energy companies are being subsidised as they sell it on at market rate.
Posted by Rainbow Solar, 19 Jan 2012