12 Dec 2007
Shell has announced it is to team up with biofuels specialist HR Biopetroleum to build a pilot facility for growing marine algae that can be turned in biofuel.
The two firms are to form a joint venture company called Cellana to manage the project, which will involve the construction of a demonstration facility in Hawaii capable of assessing different natural microalgae species and determining which produce the highest yields.
Shell said that algae have considerable potential as a source of biofuel because they can "double their mass several times a day and produce at least 15 times more oil per hectare than alternatives such as rape, palm soya or jatropha ".
Advocates of algae-based biofuels also argue that they avoid many of the environmental problems associated with conventional biofuels because the algae can be grown in sea water ponds and not use up agricultural land and fresh water.
"Algae have great potential as a sustainable feedstock for production of diesel-type fuels with a very small CO2 footprint," said Graeme Sweeney, Shell executive vice president of future fuels and CO2. "This demonstration will be an important test of the technology and, critically, of commercial viability."
Environmental concerns about the use of algae for generating biofuels centre on the impact commercially cultivated algae could have on marine ecosystems. But Shell insisted that protection of the marine ecosystem will be central to facility design, adding that it will grow only non-modified, marine microalgae species that are indigenous to Hawaii or approved by the Hawaii Department of Agriculture.
The pilot project will also use bottled carbon dioxide to assess the potential for using algae farms to capture carbon dioxide from industrial facilities.
The announcement comes as Shell is facing criticism for backing away from some of its green technology investments. The company has recently sold its photovoltaic operations in India and Sri Lanka, and according to reports in The Guardian is committed to disposing of similar investments in the Philippines and Indonesia.
Shell said the decision, which follows the sale last year of its solar module production business unit, was prompted by the operations' lack of profitability.
But advocates of solar power accused the oil giant of damaging the embryonic market. Jeremy Leggett, chief executive of Solar Century, told The Guardian that he was disappointed by the move, arguing it ran counter to the company's recent commitments to tackle climate change.
"Shell and Solar Century were among the 150 companies that recently signed up to the hard-hitting Bali Declaration," he said. "It is vital that companies act consistently with the rhetoric in such declarations... This latest evidence of half-heartedness or worse in Shell's renewables activities leaves me… disappointed. Unless fossil fuel energy companies evolve their core activities meaningfully, we are in deep trouble."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT TECHNOLOGY
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The best green companies in the UK should be preparing their entries for annual BusinessGreen Leaders Awards
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Utopia revisited!
Hi everyone, My name is Sander Hazewinkel and currently my company is one of the largest "real" producers of marine algae in the world. We use state of the art closed systems that will outperform all the installations that I have seen on this website and that belong to the so called frontrunners. One of the things that really disturbs me,when I hear all these "pseudo" scientists claim enormous projected yields, is the energy cost that is involved in growing algae. I dare to state that it is impossible to gain a posititive energy balance with the production of algae. It's not the apparatus (toy) that you use to grow the algae that holds the solution to a positive energy balance. The problem is that the algae itself is not so efficient as some people want us to believe. I know from hands-on experience on a commercial production scale! But I also know and understand the math behind the problem. One of the people that describes a part of the math very much spot on is Krassen Dimitrov (google will find his article). If you are able to read some Dutch (google translate might be helpfull) you can read a presentation that I gave a couple of months ago for an organisation that is doing research on energy options for Afrika. http://tinyurl.com/5d8fkm It's not that i want to temper the enthusiasm for Algae, on the contrary! Algae are super as a nutrition (omega-3-fatty-acids, over 50% proteins, anti-oxidants and so on and on) all very important components for life and costing much more energy to produce otherwise than with algae. So algae still hold a strong key to a more sustainable futere, but unfortunately not to a primairy source for energy! I dare anyone to come-up with a complete lifecycle-anlysis on the production of algae that proves my point to be wrong and I dare to bet that nobody will come up with the whole (energy)cost figure because it is more sexy to talk about energyyields in stead of energy costs! With kind regards, Sander Hazewinkel
Posted by Sander Hazewinkel, 13 Nov 2008