29 Jul 2009
Greenpeace stepped up its high-profile campaign against the use of hazardous chemicals in the IT industry yesterday, slamming HP for apparently reneging on a commitment to phase out certain toxins from its products by the end of the year.
Members of the green group launched a two-pronged protest at the company's Silicon Valley headquarters, gaining access to a rooftop and painting a 3,500 sq metre message of "Hazardous Products" on the building, using non-toxic children’s finger paint.
The group said it had also directly targeted HP employees with the protest, organising a William Shatner-style robo-call to staff saying: "You at HP promised me a toxin-free computer by 2009. Now, my friends at Greenpeace tell me I have to wait until 2011. What's up with that?"
The call referred to Greenpeace's claim that HP has pushed back its commitment to eliminate brominated flame retardants and polyvinyl chloride plastics from its computers from this year to 2011.
At the HP Palo Alto facility, protestors dressed in HazMat suits greeted employees as they showed up for work. Local police escorted the painters from the premises without arresting them.
A spokesman for the group said HP had fallen behind arch-rival Apple in the environmentally friendly stakes, because Apple had already stopped using the controversial materials.
HP sites in other countries have also seen protests. Activists returned " toxic laptops" to the company's Chinese headquarters and in Holland staff were confronted by Greenpeace activists with pictures of the pollution HP's toxic products cause in Asia and Africa.
Greenpeace's campaign against toxic components was launched in August 2006 and is built around the quarterly publication of a report ranking IT companies environmental and eWaste policies. It has been credited with driving significant improvements across the sector as companies compete to climb up the ranking. Most notably, Apple responded to a series of protests by developing a wide-reaching environmental policy and pledging to phase out numerous chemicals.
However, in recent reports Greenpeace has marked down a number of manufacturers that have delayed commitments to phase out potentially hazardous substances.
Rival manufacturers Dell and Lenovo could also be bracing themselves for similar protests, after Greenpeace said they too had delayed commitments to phase out hazardous chemicals.
HP was unamused by the Greenpeace protest and issued a statement reiterating its commitment to limiting its environmental impact. "The unconstructive antics at HP’s headquarters today did nothing to advance the goals that all who care about the environment share," it said. "HP will continue its efforts to develop new products and programmes around the globe that help the company, its business partners and customers conserve energy, reduce materials use and reduce waste through responsible reuse and recycling."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT TECHNOLOGY
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Companies must be more open about which groups they fund and why, say green marketing experts
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Toxic chemicals in personal care products
All consumers should protest the use of any bad chemical, not only in computers but especially in personal care products. I was amazed to discover how many products contain them and this led me to develop Organoderm which is devoid of ANY HARMFUL CHEMICAL/ingredient. See www.circleofgreen.org for comprehensive lists.
Posted by Dr. Ed Domanskis, 23 Feb 2010