01 Mar 2010
Google's high-profile plan to develop renewable energy that is cheaper than coal could soon bear fruit, after the search giant revealed it has developed a new mirror technology that could slash the cost of building a solar thermal plant.
According to reports by Reuters, the internal prototype for the new concentrated solar technology promises to cut the cost of solar thermal power systems in half.
Bill Weihl, Google's green czar, told the news agency that if development and testing go well, he could see the product being ready for commercial-scale deployment in one to three years. "Things have progressed," he said. "We have an internal prototype."
The project is focused on reducing the cost of the heliostats, the fields of mirrors that track the sun and concentrate its power on a point so that it can be used to create steam and drive a turbine. Google has reportedly developed new materials for the mirror's reflective surface and the substrate on which the mirror is mounted.
Google has already made a number of high-profile investments in concentrated solar thermal systems through solar companies eSolar and BrightSource. Weil said the new mirror technology was not at a stage where it could be tested externally, but he added that both eSolar and BrightSource had already expressed interest in the development.
The announcement is the latest in an onslaught of green pledges made by Google this year as it accelerates plans to establish itself as a major player in the clean energy field, as well as improve its own environmental credentials as a huge consumer of energy.
It has already earmarked concentrated solar thermal, enhanced geothermal and high-altitude wind systems as areas for future development. In an interview earlier this year with the New York Times, Weihl said the company was making good progress towards its goal of developing renewable energy technologies that can prove more cost effective than coal.
As long ago as November 2007, Google.org announced its RE
LATEST STORIES ABOUT ENERGY
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Solar Trade Association predicts next round of feed-in tariff cuts will be delayed by one month
INSIGHT
NEWSLETTER
INSIGHT
This new handbook explores practices that allow organisations to overcome their technological limitations and traditional office-culture challenges - freeing employees to do more with less from wherever they want to.
The centralised printers used in many businesses are wasteful, unreliable and expensive to run - just as their suppliers intend
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Low cost heliostat
Existing mirror coatings reflect more than 90% of solar energy, so how are you going to double that? Secondly, IMHO any steered solar system is suspect on the grounds that no biological system steers leaves diurnally and if nature doesn't do it, it probably isn't worth doing.
Posted by Tony, 25 Mar 2010
misstatements
1. You cannot cut csp cost in half by improving the mirror - it isn't more than half the cost, as is! 2. Large PV is cheaper than CSP at the c/kWh level, not the other way around, even if Weill wants to believe otherwise. However, for a typical hyped-up version of green reality, it's not so bad. Better than the 'boom box'.
Posted by solar expert in disguise, 01 Mar 2010