Energy-saving technologies shunned over long pay-back periods

Corporate policies demanding return on investment periods of no longer than three years are counting against many new energy-efficient systems

By James Murray

05 Aug 2008

Be the first to comment

Solar rooftop

Strict corporate policies governing the length of return on investment periods are hampering the adoption of energy-saving and renewable energy technologies, according to a new survey from consultancy EnergyTeam.

The survey of more than 110 UK bosses found that 81 per cent would demand a return on investment on new technologies, regardless of the potential long-term cost and carbon savings.

Only five per cent would invest in technologies promising a five-year pay-back period, despite the fact that such technologies would be likely to deliver the greatest cost savings over the full life of the product.

"A lot of companies we come across will not invest in anything that has a longer than three-year return," said Brian Rickerby, joint managing director at EnergyTeam. "Many energy-saving technologies such as new lighting or insulation can deliver big returns within three years, but the larger projects such as CHP [combined heat and power], smart building management systems and solar panels often require longer pay-back periods."

The rising cost of energy has meant that return on investment periods for larger energy-saving projects are shortening, but Rickerby said many firms were still uninformed about the scale of the long-term cost savings that new energy-saving technologies could offer.

He added that the problem was amplified by a lack of awareness over the various tax breaks that are on offer for energy-efficient systems, such as CHP systems and new air-conditioning technologies.

"The Carbon Trust has a long list of products that qualify for enhanced capital allowance, but when we ask customers if they checked the list they have rarely done so," he said. "They will have bought a cheaper version of a technology, when they could have bought a more expensive and more energy-efficient version at a lower cost if they had exploited the tax break."

Rickerby advised that firms keen to exploit potential energy savings should develop a meaningful energy strategy and implement clear energy measurement policies as a first step that should make it easier for the company to justify long-term investments.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment

  

Greg Barker has said that despite cuts to solar incentives the industry will continue to grow this year - is he right?

4%

6%

7%

83%

INSIGHT

Submit your email address and we'll send a link to a personal newsletter control panel


Mechanical Integrity Engineer

09 Feb 2012

Mechanical Integrity Engineer, 35,000-45,000, Midlands A global power organization are looking to identify a Mechanical Integrity Engineer to become part of a globally accalimed engineer department. Delivering R&D Projects in relation to the business' GAS and Steam Turbine operations - the role will challenge the engineers mechanical design capabilities and integrity of company products. The succe

APC

Guidelines for specification of data centre power density

The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres

Quocirca

Powering the data centre

A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres