15 Oct 2009
China could bury its coal plant emissions underground as a cost-effective means of reducing global greenhouse gas levels, according to a study released yesterday.
Research by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, a government lab of the US Department of Energy, estimates that China has enough deep rock layers with the capacity to store the country’s carbon dioxide emissions for the next 100 years.
"Conventional thinking had been that China did not have a lot of storage for carbon. But it turns out China does," said the report’s lead author, Robert Dahowski. "Enough for many decades, perhaps hundreds of years."
The study argues that carbon capture and storage (CCS) – a fledgling technology that traps emissions from coal-burning plants and stores it in rock formations deep underground – would enable China to tap its vast domestic fossil fuel reserves while efficiently cutting CO2 emissions. The nation is the world's biggest greenhouse gas producer.
The cost to transport, inject and monitor carbon dioxide from 1,623 large sources of emissions – including coal-fired plants, steel mills and cement and ammonia plants – would average US$5 to US$7 per ton in China, about half of estimated costs in the US, said the report.
It noted that more than 90 per cent of China's large power plants and industrial facilities were within 160km of potential carbon sequestration sites. "This suggests there will be little need to build extensive and costly long-distance CO2 pipeline infrastructure," the study noted.
The research was gathered and analysed over a five-year period by scientists in the US and China. The project was supported by the US Department of Energy, China's Ministry of Science and Technology, the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum, sponsors of the Global Energy Technology Strategy Program and US energy management specialist Leonardo Technologies.
The study's release closely follows a speech by US energy secretary Steven Chu, which highlighted the importance of developing CCS technology, given the unlikelihood that the US, China and India would stop burning coal.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT FACILITIES
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The ignominy heaped on Fred Goodwin will be nothing compared to that carbon intensive firms risk facing
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
China's carbon emissions could be cheaply buried underground, says study
Supposedly, the steep decline in oil and coal deposit represents less emission of heat-trapping gas down the road and challenges the world economy to develop more sustainable power promptly, in place of gambling on the unproven approach of carbon capture and storage. Drastic dent in fossil fuels requires bolder and more decisive funding for substitute. I think if the crude oil price is in excessive of $40 a barrel, world economy can't be sustainable, and the stimulus package also can't last long. As a part of the effort for sustainability, sustainable energy act must pass immediately. It might be important to remember after the program of cash for clunkers ended, auto sales in USA has plunged. This stagnant global economy suppressed by the shortage of these fuels is thirsty for a next big future just like the uninsured and underinsured can't afford to wait.
Posted by hsr0601, 16 Oct 2009