06 Oct 2008
Starbucks has been accused of greenwashing today after it was claimed that the company wastes 23.4 million litres of water – enough to fill an Olympic swimming pool every 83 minutes – by leaving taps on in its branches all day.
An undercover investigation by The Sun newspaper revealed that staff at every branch are instructed to leave a cold tap behind the counter running constantly to wash spoons and utensils.
In response to the paper's front page splash, the company originally claimed that leaving the tap on uses less water than repeatedly turning it on and off again.
However, this line of defence was later dropped by the company, which instead argued that the approach was adopted in the interest of hygiene.
A representative for Starbucks said: "Dipper wells use a stream of continuous cold fresh-running water to rinse away food residue, help keep utensils clean and prevent bacterial growth. This technique is common and well-accepted in the industry."
They added that the company's policies were in line with World Health Organisation (WHO), United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the European Union (EU) directives for in-store water supply standards, but conceded, that " the opportunity exists to reduce our total water usage".
However, The Sun accused the company of greenwash, labelling it " Starberks" and arguing that the policy wasted enough water daily for the entire two million strong population of drought-hit Nambia.
It also claimed that the practice ran counter to the firm's high profile environmental commitments.
Starbucks has made much of its ethical policies to its customers over the past few years – sourcing organic fair trade coffee and widely publicising an environmental mission statement.
The statement outlines a commitment to: developing innovative and flexible solutions to bring about change, buy sell and use environmentally friendly products and instilling environmental responsibility as a corporate value.
Neither the hygiene defence nor the claim that leaving taps running uses less water is sufficient justification for the policy, according to Peter Robinson, director of environmental charity Waste Watch.
"The claim that you need to keep taps running non-stop for health and safety reasons is bonkers," he said. "Big companies like Starbucks should be setting an example about not wasting natural resources. If they are serious about going green, they should ditch this shameful practice immediately."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Model X sports Back to the Future-style "falcon doors" and is set to go on sale in 2014
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Its simple
A small electrically heated dipping tub not unlike an electric fryer would accomplish the task very efficiently. Water temp could be easily regulated to kill any contamination.
Posted by Agnes, 14 Oct 2008
no different than the other guys
Go into an ice cream store or smoothie store and find out how they are safeguarding your health...it probably is no different than what SBUX is doing.
Posted by doubter, 07 Oct 2008
Not Green Washing in any sense of the words
Starbucks' methods for washing are certainly not green. But they are also not greenwashing. The Sun is the one who is making exaggerated claims by calling Starbucks wasteful practices greenwash. For more on this please see my post on www.isitgreenwash.com Green washing is a big problem but we need to be careful about how the label is applied, just like we need to be careful about what products and services are called green or sustainable.
Posted by Isitgreenwash.com, 07 Oct 2008
Starbucks is a waste all around
Starbucks is a symbol for just how wasteful humanity has become. Water aside, Starbucks goes through millions of paper cups ,cup condoms, and plastic lids because they are not willing to wash reusable cups in most stores They transport perhaps a couple billion tons of coffee bean around the world, and thus have a huge legacy carbon foot print before they even turn on the taps Large beverage firms like Coke and Starbucks should be a major focus of environmental groups, and Al gore. By highlighting the needless waste that these firms create, they are an easy target for change. they are the 80 in the 80/20 rule. cleanergreenerchina.com
Posted by Crossroads, 06 Oct 2008