25 Sep 2009
South Korea and China are spending more on green projects as a percentage of their economic stimulus packages than other G20 nations, according to a new study from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP).
The UNEP report, released yesterday, puts South Korea at the top of the list, with 79 per cent of its total economic stimulus spending earmarked for green initiatives.
It was followed by China with 34 per cent and Australia with 21 per cent. France, Germany and the US rounded out the top five, with each nation committing less than 20 per cent.
UNEP executive director Achim Steiner said the figures, provided by HSBC Global Research, were "both cause for optimism and cause for concern". He noted that while "an estimated 15 per cent of the estimated US$3.1 trillion (£1.9 trillion) worth of global stimulus packages [is] green in nature", it is "in many cases well below the recommended one per cent of global GDP which economists advise is the sum that can catalyse real and sustainable, worldwide change".
The report warns that overall investments in renewable energy remain inadequate to reduce carbon emissions in line with the targets scientists believe are necessary to limit average global temperature rises to two degrees – a goal agreed on by G8 nations in July.
In order to achieve the target, global sustainable energy funding needs to more than double to $500bn annually, it says.
The report also notes that there are $250bn worth of fossil fuel subsidies across the G20 that could be diverted help accelerate the transition to low-carbon technologies. It also recommends that governments phase out agriculture subsidies as another way to cut emissions.
Earlier this year, South Korea unveiled a US$85bn plan to invest in eco-friendly industries, while China has announced incentives for solar projects and plans to fund large-scale wind farms as part of its stimulus package.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT ENERGY
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Everyone welcomes Greg Barker’s pledge to grow the solar industry, but with the small print promising to shrink the sector this year firms are divided on how to respond
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
I feel so much happier now I understand all this. Tahnks!
I feel so much happier now I understand all this. Tahnks!
Posted by Bella, 28 May 2011
Myth of farm subsidies
Merely phasing out subsidies does not raise farm prices or stop oversupply or address shortages. So it undercuts grassfed livestock, hay/straw/pasture, so it doesn't cut corn production, so it's not good for emissions. We need price floors & supply management instead. Then no subsidies are needed. Search "Farm Bill Primer" "Brad Wilson" zspace for proof.
Posted by Brad Wilson, 01 Dec 2010