31 Dec 2009
Investment in clean technologies is set to increase over the next 12 months and is unlikely to be unduly hampered by the weak agreement delivered at the Copenhagen Summit earlier this month, according to a major survey of leading investors from investment bank Jefferies.
The survey of 200 clean tech investors representing over $400bn of assets found that respondents believe that continued government subsidies and a general recovery in the credit markets will more than offset any harm done to the sector by politicians' failure to secure a stronger international climate change agreement.
Bruce Huber, head of European clean tech investment at Jefferies, said that the outlook for the European market was particularly impressive.
"Continued incentive plans at the country level that nurtured the European clean tech industry are seen as more crucial to investment and continued growth than the outcome at Copenhagen," he said, although he added that the health of the sector remained largelty dependent on support from policy measures.
"What is clear is that both local government incentives and transnational policies aimed at putting the brakes on climate change are fundamental to the continued growth of the clean tech industry," he said.
Investors believe that government support in the form of subsidies, tax breaks, low interest loans and other incentive schemes remains essential if the clean tech sector is to maintain its rapid growth rates and ultimately compete with more carbon intensive technologies. The survey revealed high levels of confidence that these support mechanisms will remain in place.
In addition, many of the respondents predicted that a number of high profile clean technologies were on the cusp of mainstream adoption with nearly half predicting that the mass adoption of electric vehicles is less than five years away.
A majority of respondents also predicted that the combination of technical innovations and a price war between leading solar panel firms will continue to drive down costs of solar installation.
The Jeffries survey follows reports from analyst firm New Energy Finance predicting that global clean tech investment in 2010 would reach $160bn, compared with $125bn in 2009.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT ENERGY
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Model X sports Back to the Future-style "falcon doors" and is set to go on sale in 2014
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
From the solar perspective, I disagree
Hi Tom, thanks for the info from Jeffries, but from the solar perspective I think Jeffries really misses the mark. If the driver of new investment is government subsidies, then taking a snapshot of solar incentives in European countries should give you a fairly good idea of the environment, and that environment doesnt look good. Briefly; Spain: 20% unemployment. Cap on solar PV project of 500MW. Serious liquidity problems. No revision forecast on subsidies (cap or tariff rate) for 2010. Greece: verge of defaulting on sovereign debt, high unemployment. Massive bureaucratic issues surrounding PV permitting. Three ground-mounted installations commissioned in 2009 (?). Germany: Still seems to be plugging forward. Downward indexation of the tariff. Few ground-mounted projects. One of the only lights in the market. Italy: Has been much more difficult to permit projects than expected. Current feed-in tariff will expire at the end of 2010. Similar financial problems as Spain. Expect maybe 500MW connected in 2010. France: Growing but still relatively small. BIPV tariff will be revised. Expect 300MW (?) connected in 2010. Combined with a number of economists (Krugman, et al) expecting a ?double dip? scenario for economic recovery, and I dont see solar being a big draw for technology. The competitive advantage of thin film over PV has narrowed, and no one wants to invest in manufacturing. Despite the glut in production, technology improvements are always marginal, never radical.
Posted by Bill Hargett, 03 Jan 2010