01 Sep 2009
Japan is developing a giant solar power space generator that it expects to begin transmitting solar energy to earth from an orbit 36,000km above the earth's within the next 30 years.
The $21bn (£13bn) government-backed project includes plans for the construction of a solar space station comprising four square kilometres of solar panels with a total capacity of 1GW – enough to supply about 294,000 homes in Tokyo, according to a statement posted yesterday on the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry web site.
Over the next four years, the project will focus on developing technology that will send the electricity generated by the orbiting solar panels back to Earth in the form of microwaves.
In 2015, the government plans to launch a small satellite fitted with solar panels, which will be used to test the effectiveness with which the technology can beam electricity from space through the ionosphere – the outermost layer of Earth’s atmosphere. The station is expected to be fully operational in the 2030s.
"It sounds like a science fiction cartoon, but solar power generation in space may be a significant alternative energy source in the century ahead as fossil fuel disappears," Kensuke Kanekiyo, managing director of government think-tank Institute of Energy Economics, told the Bloomberg news agency.
The project is being led by the trade ministry and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, with participation by a research group representing 16 businesses. They include Japanese thin-film photovoltaic module producer Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, its solar cell and satellite-making sister company Mitsubishi Electric Corp, and Tokyo-based IHI Corp, which produces space development-related equipment.
Transporting panels to the planned solar station will be prohibitively expensive, so Japan needs to find a way to reduce costs to make it commercially viable, Hiroshi Yoshida, chief executive of Excalibur, a Tokyo-based space and defense policy consultancy, told Bloomberg.
"These expenses need to be lowered to a hundredth of current estimates," he warned.
However, advocates of space solar projects point out that solar energy at the edge of the Earth's atmosphere is estimated to be 10 times greater than on the surface, as there is no atmospheric or cloud interference. Much of the technology required to transmit the energy to Earth is also based on existing satellite systems.
The Japanese project mirrors a similar US initiative that earlier this year saw energy giant PG&E announce that it would purchase power provided by California-based space solar firm Solaren Corp, which is aiming to start beaming solar power from outer space within seven years.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT TECHNOLOGY
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
Model X sports Back to the Future-style "falcon doors" and is set to go on sale in 2014
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Useless
This is a useless project and a waste of resources, even if the technical challenges can be overcome. A reponse is here: http://tinyurl.com/yccqtmq
Posted by Chris, 24 Sep 2009
What could be greener?
This idea came from the 60's or 70's, and has been discussed extensively by the National Space Society. What could be greener than catching solar energy in space? The main issue is economics and one can not rely of their intuition for that.
Posted by Jay Huebner, 13 Sep 2009
Technical Nightmare
Air Mass Zero (AMO) has near 1,365 Watts per meter squared. A good module has a percentage of conversion of photon energy into electric power of 25% and that means that your array is 10,000 meters squared. Loss to convert that electricity into microwave and loss in transmission will reduce your energy but still should be over 3 MW. That is not so bad, but installation with a Union Scale Space Electricial could be well...astronomical.
Posted by Sidney Clouston, 15 Sep 2009
Better Options for $21 Billion
Why would the Japanese government spend $21 billion for such a project when other renewable energy options are so much more cost-effective? In their plan, they will be spending $21 million per MW of installed capacity, which is absolutely crazy. Solar PV alone would cost around $12-15 million per MW, wind would cost about $2 million per MW, and more energy efficiency in the energy-efficient island would probably be even cheaper than these. I believe this is something that will eventually be dropped. No reason to spend that much just for 1GW of power.
Posted by Carlos Rymer, 04 Sep 2009