18 Jun 2008
Plans for three wind turbines at car manufacturer Lotus' facility in Norfolk have been put on hold after the proposals were rejected by a local planning committee in a move that the company behind the turbines described as the " worst example yet of a planning system that is not fit for purpose".
The planning application for three 2MW turbines, capable of providing power for the Lotus facility as well as approximately 1,000 local homes, had previously been rejected by the committee on the basis of "visual intrusiveness" and objections from the Ministry of Defence (MoD).
However, Lotus had been confident that the second application would be granted approval after the MoD dropped its objections and the official planning officer's report recommended the proposals be given the go ahead. The report claimed that "while I fully appreciate Members' concerns as expressed in the refusal of the previous application I don't consider that a refusal on visual intrusion could be sustained at appeal".
South Norfolk Council's own 2005 study into potential wind turbine sites had also specifically referenced the site as an area suitable for supporting a small group of two to six turbines.
Yet the North West Area Planning Committee again voted by five to three to block the proposal, citing "visual intrusiveness".
A spokesman for South Norfolk Council said that the vote was not by a big enough margin for the rejection to stand and as a result the plans would now go forward to the council's full planning committee for a final decision.
However, Dale Vince, OBE and managing director of Ecotricity, the company that plans to install the turbines, expressed frustration at the decision. "What hope do we have of keeping the lights on in the future if we can't even build wind turbines on an industrial site surrounded by farmland - like the Lotus factory," he said. "This is already in the appeal process and we're confident of winning it - following a needless waste of time and public money of course."
He added that the rejection of the planning application in the face of official endorsement from the planning officer highlighted the extent to which the current planning system is "not fit for purpose".
"Onshore wind energy is our New North Sea oil, with enough untapped energy to power the whole country three or four times over," he said. "The one thing holding it back is this archaic planning system."
The delay to the proposed Lotus turbines comes just weeks after the British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) warned that planning bottlenecks are beginning to impact investor confidence in the sector. According to new figures from the trade group, the last eighteen months has seen a significant drop off in the scale of planning applications, with last year seeing only 1,500MW of new projects entering the planning system.
Speaking at a recent industry round table, BWEA chairman Adam Bruce said that the drop off in activity may be in part down to the fact that many of the best locations had already been taken, but he also feared that concerns over planning objections were also discouraging operators from putting forward new project proposals.
LATEST STORIES ABOUT ENERGY
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The best green companies in the UK should be preparing their entries for annual BusinessGreen Leaders Awards
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
This is the straw man argument
"What hope do we have of keeping the lights on in the future if we can't even build wind turbines..." There is no indication whatsoever that wind turbines are the sole answer for energy needs of the future. The concern for tourism - a HUGE part of the Norfolk/Virginia Beach economy, movie-making scenery (another significant part of the economy there)and the fact that Norfolk is the site of the largest naval confligration in the world - that just might have something to do with the decision of committee. Throw in the hurricane and brutal nor'easter seasons along the VA coast and the 5-3 vote - which last time I did math was a majority but apparently not enough of a majority here - seems reasonable. There ARE places where turbines make sense, are wanted and valued - why the insistence on this location? The "green" view that it's the green way or the highway is really really tiresome.
Posted by diane, 08 Jun 2009
Lotus wind farm
Well, by 2050 it will be an application for an off-shore wind farm as the sea will have reclaimed most of Norfolk. Then I'm sure "visual intrusion" won't be too high on the agenda.
Posted by AccordGuy, 03 Jun 2009
...and still more hot air...
You really have to take your hat off to these guys. They can make truth out of fiction and not blink an eye. To quote your article. "Dale Vince, OBE and managing director of Ecotricity... "What hope do we have of keeping the lights on in the future if we can't even build wind turbines on an industrial site surrounded by farmland..." Keep this in mind Mr. Vince, if your Lotus plant relied exclusively on wind power, the lights would only come on 3 out of 10 times. Great solution. Next it will be tossing babies into coal burning power plants as they emit less sulfur. The class action lawyers of tomorrow thank you for your short sighted knee jerk planning today.
Posted by Scott Chase, 02 Jun 2009