US lawmakers defend cap-and-trade plan

Climate change tax rejected in favour of tested cap-and-trade plan

By Andrew Donoghue

04 Feb 2009

Comments: 1

Chimney

The committee charged with developing the US government's plan to tackle climate change has claimed that the country's approach must be consistent with the rest of the world.

Speaking at an event to announce the proposals underpinning the bill this week, Senator Barbara Boxer, chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee responded to questions about why a green tax wasn't being proposed by claiming that cap-and-trade was the best way to proceed.

"I don't agree with those economists who say a tax is the best way," she said. "We have done cap-and-trade before and it has worked really well in that fight against acid rain. The world is doing cap-and-trade so we need to be consistent."

In a speech that was careful to make overtures to the private sector at a time when US companies are struggling, Boxer said that it made more sense for industry to decide the true price of carbon.

"I also like the notion of the private sector putting a price on carbon. I would prefer that rather than having us do it," she said.

Boxer added that the committee was aiming to pass the bill onto congress in weeks rather than months.

"We are not sitting back waiting for some magic moment – we are ready to go, " she said.

The overall aim is to have the bill as fully formed as possible before a major international meeting in Copenhagen in December.

"Copenhagen is in December and that is why I said we will have the bill out of this committee by the end of the year," added Boxer.

The two primary goals of the legislation, according to Boxer, are to reduce global warming gas emissions while promoting economic growth and energy independence.

The key principles underpinning the legislation announced at the meeting included commitments to:

• Reduce emissions to levels guided by science

• Set short- and long-term emission goals that our certain and enforceable

• Ensure that state and local entities are involved in pioneering efforts to reduce global warming

• Preparing an accountable market-based system which efficiently reduces carbon emissions

• Use revenues from the carbon market to keep consumers whole as the US transitions to clean energy

• Invest in clean energy technologies and energy efficiency

• Work with the international community including faith leaders to support developing nations in responding and adapting to global warming.

The committee made several references to the idea that climate change wouldn't only be punitive but would help to stimulate the economy.

"We believe that we will create millions of green jobs if this is done," said Boxer. "We all understand the urgent need for action and we also understand this is a great way to reinvigorate our economy."

Although she was pushed by reporters to provide some idea of the numbers that would underpin the proposed carbon cap-and-trade scheme, Boxer said that the committee would be listening to scientific advice over the coming weeks.

"We believe that science will guide us period. We are guided by science," she said. "We will be having updates from scientists. There are scientists that say X, scientists that say Y. We want to get everyone's opinion and then we will make a call on what the consensus is."

But despite being led by science, the committee is also including religious leaders in the climate change debate. Boxer introduced Reverend Jim Ball, president and chief executive officer of the Evangelical Environment Network, to pledge his support for the bill.

"Jesus was asked what is the greatest commandment in the law," he said. " What are our lives supposed to be about? And He said, 'We are supposed to love God and love our neighbours as we love ourselves', and today part of that means addressing and overcoming global warming. We shall overcome this issue as well. "

Making reference to carbon-capping legislation that was defeated in congress last year, Boxer claimed that the committee had learned a lot from that experience and wouldn't be making the same mistakes.

"We learned a lot of lessons. We knew we didn't have 60 votes. We wanted to test the waters," she said. "A lot of the people who voted against us are no longer here and are replaced by the people standing behind me."

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment

  

LATEST STORIES ABOUT

No matching document

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

LATEST JOBS

Information currently unavailable.

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

HIGHLIGHT

business green leaders light bulb

You could be a BusinessGreen Leader – Five green things we’ve learnt this week

The best green companies in the UK should be preparing their entries for annual BusinessGreen Leaders Awards

Greg Barker has said that despite cuts to solar incentives the industry will continue to grow this year - is he right?

3%

6%

7%

84%

INSIGHT

Submit your email address and we'll send a link to a personal newsletter control panel


Mechanical Integrity Engineer

09 Feb 2012

Mechanical Integrity Engineer, 35,000-45,000, Midlands A global power organization are looking to identify a Mechanical Integrity Engineer to become part of a globally accalimed engineer department. Delivering R&D Projects in relation to the business' GAS and Steam Turbine operations - the role will challenge the engineers mechanical design capabilities and integrity of company products. The succe

APC

Guidelines for specification of data centre power density

The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres

Quocirca

Powering the data centre

A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres