02 Nov 2007
Energy giant Chevron this week announced it is to team up with US Department of Energy's National Renewable (NREL) to work on a new research project to develop an approach for turning algae into transportation fuel.
The company said the initiative, which joins an existing Chevron-NREL research project on turning decomposing food into biofuel, will investigate various algae strains and assess their suitability for being transformed into transport fuels, including green fuel for jet engines.
NREL director Dan Arvizu said he was confident the project would lead to a rapid increase in the yield and productivity of key algae strains.
"NREL operated the Aquatic Species Program for the Department of Energy for nearly 20 years, giving us unique insights into the research required to produce cost-effective fuels from algal oils or lipids," he added.
Experts regard algae-based biofuels as a highly promising alternative to controversial biofuels made from food crops as algae is abundant, can be grown quickly in industrial environments, and delivers high volumes of oil.
Don Paul, Chevron's vice president and chief technology officer, said the technology was likely to play a central part in the energy giant's future.
"Chevron believes that non-food feedstock sources such as algae and cellulose hold the greatest promise to grow the biofuels industry to large scale," he said.
The news came a week after Dutch biofuel company AlgaeLink unveiled a new photobioreactor technology, which it claims will lead to increased yields and dramatically reduce installation costs. Hans van de Ven, president of AlgaeLink, said the new approach to creating algae-based biofuels would bring down costs sufficiently to make the fuel commercially viable.
Meanwhile, Oxfam this week became the latest group to raise concerns about the environmental and humanitarian effects of European policies which have stimulated demand for first-generation biofuels.
A report from the charity entitled Biofuelling Poverty concluded that the EU target of gaining 10 per cent of transport fuels from biofuels by 2020 was leading to the rapid expansion of biofuel plantations in developing countries that threaten to "force poor people from their land, destroy their livelihoods, lead to the exploitation of workers and hurt the availability and affordability of food".
Oxfam's Robert Bailey said that urgent action was required to prevent such results.
"The EU must include safeguards to ensure that the rights and livelihoods of people in producing countries are protected," he said. "Without these, the 10 per cent target should be scrapped and the EU should go back to the drawing board."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT TECHNOLOGY
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The best green companies in the UK should be preparing their entries for annual BusinessGreen Leaders Awards
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
Oxfam's concerns should be mundane by now
This technology is exciting news. And looking at its rapid advance in the last year, since the first article appeared about the Spanish company, Biofuel Systems SL, and the help it was receiving from the University of Alicante, I have no doubt that algae will be a big player in the next few years. However, Oxfam's concerns look at the issue of food versus biofuel in a superficial manner. Much of the improvement in food production in the last century has come as a result of petroleum inputs, which are becoming very expensive. It seems to me that not only is food production being diverted to biofuel production, but that creating both products is now becoming more expensive. And I guess the question now is how much of the biofuel production will now be rediverted to crop production in the same manner as petroleum. In other words, crop diversion to biofuels is just one more result of higher petroleum costs. Poor farmers who are kicked off their land are victims of the increased value of crops and the increased costs required to create them due to the more sophisticated expertise needed to convert them to biofuels. I would expect that their loss is really just another part of the same process that farmers have gone through for the last few centuries. I hope people don't overreact and hold it as justification for the view that Marx was right. He wasn't.
Posted by Bill, 04 Nov 2007