The furore surrounding the hazardous substances found in the Apple iPhone stepped up yesterday after US environmental group the Center for Environmental Health (CEH) announced it is initiating legal action against the company.
In a statement the group, which campaigns against hazardous chemicals, said that the level of phthalates found in the phone by Greenpeace are in violation of Californian law. Under the State's law, products that can expose people to phthalates or other chemicals that are reproductive toxins or carcinogens must carry a warning label.
"There is no reason to have these potentially hazardous chemicals in iPhones " said Michael Green, executive director of CEH. "We expect Apple to reformulate its products to make them safer from cradle to grave, so they don't pose a threat to consumers, workers or the environment."
Under Californian law, Apple now has 60 days before the lawsuit is formally launched to address the group's concerns.
The legal action came as Apple attempted to downplay the implications of the Greenpeace report which revealed the iPhone contained hazardous PVC and BFR substances that had been removed from some other phones on the market.
In a short statement Apple reiterated its commitment to eliminating PVC and BFRs from products by the end of next year and insisted that "like all Apple products worldwide, iPhone complies with RoHS [the restriction on hazardous substances directive], the world's toughest restrictions on toxic substances in electronics".
Company responds to Greenpeace criticism with statement insisting iPhone meets all legal standards on hazardous substances 16 Oct 2007
Tests undertaken by environmental lobby group finds iPhone contains hazardous substances already eradicated by some rival phone manufacturers 15 Oct 2007
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008






