Greenpeace has praised Apple for its recycling programme and its efforts to remove toxic chemicals from its products.
The environmental campaign group listed Apple at the bottom of its rankings in April.
But the company has now moved ahead of Sony, LG Electronics, Panasonic and HP to tenth place on the 14-company Green Electronics Guide ranking. Nokia, Dell and Lenovo topped the list.
The ranking is based on the use of toxic chemicals, initiatives to phase out such materials and recycling policies for high-tech consumer goods.
Greenpeace highlighted Apple's policies on PVC and brominated flame retardants as principal reasons for the improved assessment. The organisation particularly praised Apple's pledge to remove the substances from all its products by 2008.
Apple was also congratulated on its goal to recycle 30 per cent of its products by 2010, and the volume yielded by Apple's current recycling practices. The computer maker currently takes in 9.5 per cent of products sold seven years ago.
But Apple's ranking in the lower half of the list indicated that there is still much room for improvement. Apple still does not do enough to follow the so-called Precautionary Principle in its environmental policies, according to Greenpeace.
The organisation also knocked the principles of Apple's recycling programme, contending that, despite the large amount recycled, the programme does not extend worldwide and fails to provide enough education to customers.
Greenpeace has previously targeted Apple in a special campaign called Green My Apple in which it accused the firm of doing nothing to improve its environmental policies.
Greenpeace explained to vnunet.com that the group is especially vocal in regards to Apple because it sees the company as an industry leader capable of influencing other vendors to adopt better policies.
Apple initially shrugged off the Greenpeace report, claiming that the company is years ahead of other vendors in its practices.
Greenpeace's efforts have, however, prompted Apple chief executive Steve Jobs to release a public report outlining Apple's environmental policies and its plans for the future.
Apple did not respond to a request for comment on the latest rankings.
PC maker has made 'no progress whatsoever', says environment group 04 Apr 2007
Carbon-offset programme will cost buyers £1 per laptop and £3 per desktop 06 Jun 2007
Firm plans to plant trees to offset carbon emissions from its computers 11 Jan 2007
Smartphone still using PVC and BFRs, claims environment group 16 Oct 2007
Tests undertaken by environmental lobby group finds iPhone contains hazardous substances already eradicated by some rival phone manufacturers 15 Oct 2007"The marketing is greener than the product," claim campaigners 03 Mar 2008
Company responds to Greenpeace criticism with statement insisting iPhone meets all legal standards on hazardous substances 16 Oct 2007
Intelligent Energy ramps up funding for R&D and partnerships 04 Jul 2008
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
More news
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
